Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Ronin

Last Updated: September 1, 2026

TVS Ronin price starts at Rs. 1.30 Lakh, which is Rs. 7,350 cheaper than the base variant of Royal Enfield Hunter 350, priced at Rs. 1.38 Lakh. On the performance front, the Hunter 350 uses a 349cc engine producing 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm and the Ronin a 225.9cc engine producing 20.4 PS @ 7750 rpm. If you're deciding between the Hunter 350 and Ronin, the Ronin is the better pick for affordability and performance.

...Read More

Hunter 350 vs Ronin Comparison Summary

Specification Royal Enfield Hunter 350TVS Ronin
Ex-showroom price (base) Rs. 1.38 LakhRs. 1.30 Lakh
Mileage 36.2 kmplNot Available
Engine 349 cc225.9 cc
Max power 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm20.4 PS @ 7750 rpm
Kerb weight 177 Kg159 Kg

Hunter 350 vs Ronin Key Highlights

Basic Info Royal Enfield Hunter 350 BaseTVS Ronin Base - Lighting Black
Rating
857 reviews
215 reviews
Brand Name Royal Enfield TVS
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.38 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 1.30 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, 4 Valve, SOHC
Max Power 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm 20.4 PS @ 7750 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
TVS Ronin Colors
Braking Type Anti-lock Braking System Anti-lock Braking System
Wheel Size Front :-17 Inch,Rear :-17 Inch Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Spoke Alloy
ABS Single Channel Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Analogue Digital
EMI
Rs. 3,965 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Rs. 3,753 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 11,005 Hunter 350 Insurance Rs. 10,881 Ronin Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Spark Plugs
1 Per Cylinder
Not Available
Valves (per cylinder)
2
4
Claimed Top Speed
114 kmph
Not Available
Emission Norm Compliance
bs6.2
bs6.2
Flex Fuel Blend
E20
E20
Estimated Top Speed
Not Available
120 kmph
Engine Type
Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled
Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, 4 Valve, SOHC
Engine Displacement
349 cc
225.9 cc
Gear Box
5 Speed
5 Speed
Max Power
20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
20.4 PS @ 7750 rpm
Max Torque
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
19.93 Nm @ 3750 rpm
Bore
72 mm
66 mm
Stroke
85.8 mm
66 mm
Number Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Fuel System
Electronic Injection
Fuel Injection
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
Electronic Fuel Injection
Not Available
Compression Ratio
9.5 : 1
Not Available

Front Brake
Disc
Disc
Rear Brake
Drum
Disc
Front Caliper
2 Piston
Not Available
Rear Caliper
1 Piston
Not Available
Braking Type
Anti-lock Braking System
Anti-lock Braking System

Mileage (Overall)
36.2 kmpl
Not Available
0-100 Kmph (sec)
16.40s
Not Available
Braking 60-0 km/h
18.13m
Not Available
City Mileage (Tested)
Not Available
42.95 kmpl
Highway Mileage (Tested)
Not Available
40.77 kmpl
Braking 80-0 km/h
32.08m
Not Available
Braking 100-0 km/h
52.68m
Not Available
Estimated Mileage
35-40 kmpl
40-45 kmpl
Roll-ons 30-70 kmph (3rd Gear)
6.47s
Not Available
Roll-ons 40-80 kmph (4th Gear)
8.87s
Not Available
Fuel Gauge
Digital
Digital

Rear Suspension Compression Adjustment
Not Available
Yes
Rear Suspension Preload Adjustment
Yes
Yes
Rear Suspension Rebound Adjustment
Not Available
Yes
Rear Suspension Travel / Wheel Travel
100 mm
Not Available
Suspension-Front
Telescopic, 41mm forks
Black, 41 mm USD
Suspension-Rear
Twin shock absorbers with 6-step adjustable preload
Mono Shock with 7 Step Adjustable Preload

Front Tyre Pressure (Rider)
29 psi
25 psi
Front Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
29 psi
25 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider)
32 psi
28 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
33 psi
32 psi
Brake Fluid Grade
DOT4
Not Available
Tyre Size
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Front :-110/70-17,Rear :-130/70-17
Wheel Size
Front :-17 Inch,Rear :-17 Inch
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Make
CEAT
Not Available
Tyre Type
Tube
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
Yes
Not Available
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Spoke
Alloy

Seat height
790 mm
795 mm
Load carrying capacity
179 kg
150 kg
Fuel Tank Reserve Capacity
2.6 L
Not Available
Gross Weight
360 kg
311 kg
Engine Oil Capacity
2.2 L
Not Available
Engine Oil Grade
SAE 15W 50 API SL grade JASO MA2 semi synthetic
Not Available
Length*Width*Height
2055*810*1070 mm3
2040*805*1170 mm3
Wheelbase
1370 mm
1357 mm
Length
2055 mm
2040 mm
Ground Clearance
160 mm
181 mm
Height
1070 mm
1170 mm
Width
810 mm
805 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity
13 L
14 L
Kerb Weight
177 Kg
159 Kg
Tail Light
Bulb
LED
Front Brake Size
300 mm
300 mm
Rear Brake Size
153 mm
240 mm

Battery Type
Lead Acid
Lead Acid
Roadside assistance
Optional
Not Available
USB charging port
Type C
Yes
Headlight
Halogen
LED
Battery Capacity
12V / 8AH
12V / 6AH
Projector head light
Not Available
Yes
Pilot Lamps
Not Available
Yes

Frame Type
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
Double Cradle Split Synchro Stiff Frame
Digital Display Type
LCD
LCD
Malfunction Indicator
Yes
Yes
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Pillion Seat
Yes
Yes
Pillion Grab Rail
Yes
Yes
Riding Modes
Yes
Rain,Urban
Kill Switch
Yes
Yes
Low battery alert
Yes
Yes
No. of Tripmeters
3
2
Rear Footpegs
Yes
Yes
Multi-function Lock
Yes
Yes
Daytime Running Lamps
Not Available
Yes
Additional Features/Information
Wet sump, forced lubrication, Paper element Air Cleaner
Glide Through Technology
Gear Position Indicator
Yes
Yes
Average Fuel Economy Indicator
Not Available
Yes
ABS Type
Single Channel
Single Channel
Distance To Empty
Not Available
Yes
Side Stand Warning
Yes
Yes
Physical Key
Yes
Yes
Exhaust Heat Shield
Yes
Yes
Front Footpegs
Forward-set
Forward-set
Idle Stop/Start
Not Available
Yes
Body
Metal
Metal
Instrument Cluster Control Switchcube
Yes
Not Available
Immobilizer
Not Available
Yes
ABS
Single Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Roadster Bikes
Roadster Bikes
Instrument Console Type
Analogue and Digital
Digital
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Single
Pass Beam Switch
Yes
Yes
Speedometer
Analogue
Digital
Tachometer
Not Available
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Yes
Yes
Clock
Yes
Yes
Low Battery Indicator
Yes
Yes
Low Oil Indicator
Yes
Yes
Cooling System
Air & Oil Cooled
Oil Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Service Due Indicator
Yes
Yes
Saree Guard
Yes
Yes
Shift Light
Yes
Yes
Hazard Light Switch
Yes
Yes

1st Service
500 Km / 2 Months
750-1000 Kms/30-45 Days
2nd Service
5000 Km / 6 Months
5500-6000 Kms/180 Days
3rd Service
10000 Km / 12 Months
11500-12000 Kms/365 Days
4th Service
15000 Km / 18 Months
17500-18000 Kms/550 Days

Vehicle Warranty
3 Years or 30,000 Km
Not Available
Standard Warranty (Years)
3
Not Available
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
30000
Not Available

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • Offering easy accessibility
TVS Ronin
  • Torquey engine ensures you don’t have to shift as frequently
  • Excellent fit and finish
  • Lightweight and agile in both city traffic and highway
  • Can easily accommodate tall riders
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well
  • Absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity
TVS Ronin
  • Unimpressive highway performance
  • You’ll need to pull the front brake lever really hard for aggressive braking

Is TVS Ronin Better Than Royal Enfield Hunter 350?

60% users have chosen TVS Ronin over Royal Enfield Hunter 350 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 1672 users have also rated TVS Ronin and Royal Enfield Hunter 350 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences TVS Ronin is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage and maintenance in your bike. But Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is better on the grounds of performance, comfort and features. On the basis of safety user have rated both the bikes equally.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Ronin Hunter 350
Mileage 4.0 3.9
Performance 4.3 4.4
Comfort 4.3 4.5
Maintenance 3.9 3.8
Safety 0.2 0.2
Features 4.3 4.4
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Review and Win Banner

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and TVS Ronin

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.
Q. I have an old splendor plus.Looking for a 'comfortable' ride that has good mileage which looks a bit retro.Should be good for small trips.Should be easy to ride and handle.It can have reliable engine with no vibration budget under 1.5.Is ronin the best in this category or therrs more competitors.
  • The TVS Ronin stands out as an excellent option for individuals seeking a comfortable and retro-styled commuter motorcycle that offers commendable mileage, effortless handling, and a refined, low-vibration engine. It is well-suited for short trips as well as daily commuting, all within a budget of ₹1.5 lakh. To identify the most suitable option within your preferred budget range, we recommend utilizing the filters available on ZigWheels including parameters such as price, body type, fuel efficiency, and comfort features to compare the various models and select the one that best meets your requirements: https://www.zigwheels.com/newbikes
Q. Which bike is best TVS Ronin or Yamaha FZ S?
  • My experience yamaha fzs fi v3 very good
  • Both bike are good but according to my experience FZ s bike is so good
  • Yamaha FZ s
View All Answers
|Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Community

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Vs TVS Ronin FAQs

Which bike is best between Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Ronin?
As per the users experiences Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for performance, comfort and features in your bike. But TVS Ronin is better on the grounds of mileage and maintenance. On the basis of safety user have rated both the bikes equally.
Which bike is cheaper Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Ronin?
The TVS Ronin is cheaper than Royal Enfield Hunter 350 by ₹7,350.
Which bike offers better performance Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Ronin?
For the Base version, 349 cc Petrol engine of Hunter 350 produces 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Base - Lighting Black version, 225.9 cc Petrol engine of Ronin produces 20.4 PS @ 7750 rpm of power and 19.93 Nm @ 3750 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 has better performance.

Images of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and TVS Ronin

Which one do you like more?
Ronin
Ronin
Hunter 350
Hunter 350
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Ronin
×