Bajaj Pulsar NS 125 vs Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0

Yamaha FZ-FI V3 Price starts at Rs. 1.16 Lakh which is Rs. 21,303 costlier than base model of Bajaj Pulsar NS 125 priced at Rs. 94,247. The claimed mileage of Bajaj Pulsar NS 125 is 64.75 kmpl whereas the mileage of Yamaha FZ-FI V3 is 49.3 kmpl. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar NS 125 is powered by 124.45 cc engine , while Yamaha FZ-FI V3 is powered by 149 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar NS 125 is available in 9 different colours while Yamaha FZ-FI V3 comes with 2 colours. The Comparison Bajaj Pulsar NS 125 vs Yamaha FZ-FI V3 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Pulsar NS 125 vs FZ-FI Version 3.0

Key Highlights Pulsar NS 125 BTFZ-FI Version 3.0 STD
Engine Type 4-Stroke, SOHC 4-Valve, Air Cooled, BSVI Compliant DTS-i Ei Engine Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve
Max Power 12 PS @ 8500 rpm 12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm

Pulsar NS 125 vs FZ-FI Version 3.0 Key Highlights

Basic Info Bajaj Pulsar NS 125 BTYamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0 STD
Rating
420 reviews
257 reviews
Brand Name Bajaj Yamaha
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.02 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 1.16 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type 4-Stroke, SOHC 4-Valve, Air Cooled, BSVI Compliant DTS-i Ei Engine Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve
Max Power 12 PS @ 8500 rpm 12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Bajaj Pulsar NS 125 Colors
Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0 Colors
Braking Type Anti-lock Braking System ...
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Single Channel Single Channel
Starting Kick and Self Start Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
EMI
Rs. 3,035 @ 11.99% (36 months)
Rs. 3,329 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 6,479 Pulsar NS 125 Insurance Rs. 6,746 FZ-FI Version 3.0 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Spark Plugs
1 Per Cylinder
1 Per Cylinder
Valves (per cylinder)
4
2
Claimed Top Speed
103 kmph
115 kmph
Emission Norm Compliance
BS6.2
BS6.2
Flex Fuel Blend
E20
E20
Engine Type
4-Stroke, SOHC 4-Valve, Air Cooled, BSVI Compliant DTS-i Ei Engine
Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve
Engine Displacement
124.45 cc
149 cc
Gear Box
5 Speed
5 Speed
Max Power
12 PS @ 8500 rpm
12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm
Max Torque
11 Nm @ 7000 rpm
13.3 Nm @ 5500 rpm
Bore
52 mm
57.3 mm
Stroke
58.6 mm
57.9 mm
Number Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Fuel System
Fuel Injection
Fuel Injection
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Compression Ratio
10+/- 0.5 : 1
9.6 : 1

Front Brake
Disc
Disc
Rear Brake
Drum
Disc
Front Caliper
2 Piston
2 Piston
Rear Caliper
...
1 Piston
Braking Type
Anti-lock Braking System
...

Mileage (Overall)
64.75 kmpl
49.3 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
25.85s
...
0-40 Kmph (sec)
3.28s
...

Suspension-Front
Telescopic
Telescopic fork
Suspension-Rear
Mono shocks
7-Step Adjustable Monocross Suspension

Front Tyre Pressure (Rider)
25 psi
26 psi
Front Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
25 psi
26 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider)
28 psi
30 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
32 psi
30 psi
Tyre Size
Front :-80/100-17 Rear :-110/90-17
Front :-100/80-17,Rear :-140/60-17
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy

Seat height
805 mm
790 mm
Fuel Tank Reserve Capacity
2.6 L
2 L
Length*Width*Height
2012*810*1078 mm3
1990*790*1080 mm3
Wheelbase
1353 mm
1330 mm
Length
2012 mm
1990 mm
Ground Clearance
179 mm
165 mm
Height
1078 mm
1080 mm
Width
810 mm
790 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity
12 L
13 L
Kerb Weight
144 Kg
135 Kg
Tail Light
LED
Bulb
Front Brake Size
240 mm
282 mm
Rear Brake Size
130 mm
220 mm

USB charging port
...
Headlight
LED
LED
Battery Capacity
12V / 4AH
...

Frame Type
Perimeter
Diamond
Digital Display Type
LCD
LCD Connectivity
Malfunction Indicator
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Real Time Mileage Indicator
...
Vehicle Location Tracking
...
Pillion Seat
Pillion Grab Rail
Navigation assist
...
Kick Start
...
Low battery alert
...
No. of Tripmeters
2
2
Rear Footpegs
Multi-function Lock
...
Daytime Running Lamps
Additional Features/Information
...
ECO Indicator
Gear Position Indicator
...
Average Fuel Economy Indicator
...
ABS Type
Single Channel
Single Channel
Distance To Empty
...
Side Stand Warning
...
ABS
Single Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Commuter Bikes
Sports Bikes
Instrument Console Type
Analogue and Digital
Digital
Starting
Kick and Self Start
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Split
Pass Beam Switch
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Tachometer
Digital
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Clock
Digital
Low Battery Indicator
...
Cooling System
Air Cooled
Air Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
...
Service Due Indicator
...

Vehicle Warranty
5 Years or 75,000 Km
2 Years or 30,000 Km
4th Service
...
10000 Kms
Standard Warranty (Years)
5
2
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
75000
30000

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Yamaha FZ-FI V3
  • Frugal motor, Comfortable riding stance, Muscular design
Yamaha FZ-FI V3
  • Not so peppy engine, Fit and finish isn’t as good

Is Bajaj Pulsar NS 125 Better Than Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0?

52% users have chosen Bajaj Pulsar NS 125 over Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 1807 users have also rated Bajaj Pulsar NS 125 and Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Bajaj Pulsar NS 125 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for maintenance in your bike. But Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0 is better on the grounds of comfort. On the basis of mileage, performance and features user have rated both the bikes equally.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Pulsar NS 125 FZ-FI Version 3.0
Mileage 4.2 4.2
Performance 4.3 4.3
Comfort 4.3 4.4
Maintenance 4.0 3.8
Features 4.3 4.3
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Videos of Bajaj Pulsar NS 125 and Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0

Review and Win Banner

Bajaj Pulsar NS 125 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Yamaha FZ-FI V3 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Bajaj Pulsar NS 125 and Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which is better between Bajaj Pulsar NS125 and TVS Raider?
  • The Bajaj Pulsar NS125 packs a peppy engine, is fun to ride, and could be the perfect beginner bike for you. The entry-level NS125 could be the perfect platform for those graduating from a scooter, and yearning to learn the ropes. On the other hand, TVS Raider's styling, features and performance will excite youngsters, and for someone looking at their first motorcycle, the Raider does make good sense. TVS has gone the smarter route, keeping a thrilling ride experience as the USP, instead of a purely commuter-centric approach. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.
Q. Which bike to buy, Yamaha FZ-FI V3 or Yamaha FZ-X?
  • Yamaha FZ-FI V3 is a big bike with style, features, smooth engine. While its motor offers better fuel efficiency, it lacks grunt. The Yamaha FZ-X, on the other hand, is a great commuter thanks to its easy-going ergonomics and suspension. So, if you are on a hunt for a bike that stands out in the general crop of commuters in the segment, the Yamaha FZ-X is the one for you. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
Q. Duke 125 vs ns 125 which is better.?
  • Selecting the right bike would depend on several factors such as your budget preference on the segment, features required, engine options, brand preference, etc. The KTM 125 Duke BS6 is the most affordable way into the KTM family. It Service as the perfect stepping stone to performance-oriented motorcycles. The only grouse is you may be able to master the motorcycle rather quickly, and the lack of power means you will be left craving for more performance. KTM 125 Duke is powered by a 124.7 cc engine. This Duke 125 engine generates a power of 14.5 PS @ 9250 rpm and a torque of 12 Nm @ 8000 rpm. The Bajaj Pulsar NS125 follows the same design ethos as its other NS siblings. The same wolf-inspired headlamp, muscular tank, chunky body, and split-seat setup make their way into the NS125. However, blame it on the skinny tyres and a slim telescopic fork, the proportions of the bike do not seem quite right. Bajaj Pulsar NS 125 is powered by 124.4 cc engine.This Pulsar NS 125 engine generates a power of 11.99 PS @ 8500 rpm and a torque of 11 Nm @ 7000 rpm. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership.
|Bajaj Pulsar NS 125 Community

Bajaj Pulsar NS 125 Vs Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0 FAQs

Which bike is best between Bajaj Pulsar NS 125 vs Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0?
As per the users experiences Bajaj Pulsar NS 125 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for maintenance in your bike. But Yamaha FZ-FI V3 is better on the grounds of comfort. On the basis of mileage, performance and features user have rated both the bikes equally.
Which bike is cheaper Bajaj Pulsar NS 125 vs Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0?
The Bajaj Pulsar NS 125 is cheaper than Yamaha FZ-FI V3 by ₹14,017.
Which bike offers better performance Bajaj Pulsar NS 125 vs Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0?
For the BT version, 124.45 cc Petrol engine of Pulsar NS 125 produces 12 PS @ 8500 rpm of power and 11 Nm @ 7000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the STD version, 149 cc Petrol engine of FZ-FI Version 3.0 produces 12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm of power and 13.3 Nm @ 5500 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences in terms of performance both are same.

Images of Bajaj Pulsar NS 125 and Yamaha FZ-FI V3

Which one do you like more?
Pulsar NS 125
Pulsar NS 125
FZ-FI Version 3.0
FZ-FI Version 3.0
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Bajaj Pulsar NS 125 vs Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0
×