Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Suzuki Gixxer 2019 Comparison
Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Suzuki Gixxer 2019
Suzuki Gixxer Price starts at Rs. 1.00 lakh which is Rs. 1.00 lakh costlier than Bajaj Pulsar NS200 priced at Rs. To Be Announced. The claimed mileage for the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is NA where as the claimed mileage for Suzuki Gixxer is 50.6 kmpl. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is powered by 199.5 cc engine where as Suzuki Gixxer is powered by 155 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is available in 7 different colours while Suzuki Gixxer comes with 1 colours. 53% users have chosen Suzuki 2019 Gixxer over Bajaj Pulsar NS200 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Suzuki Gixxer on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Pulsar NS200 vs 2019 Gixxer Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | Pulsar NS200 ABS | 2019 Gixxer STD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Rs. 1.14 lakh | Rs. 1.00 lakh |
| Engine Type | 4 - stroke, SOHC 4-Valve, Liquid Cooled, Triple Spark, BSIV Compliant DTS-i Engine | 4-stroke, 1-cylinder, Air-cooled |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 199.5 cc | 155 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 23.5 PS @ 9500 rpm | 14.1 PS @ 8000 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 4.86s | 5.53s |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 36.1 kmpl | ... |
| Wheel Size | Front :-17 inch, Rear:-17 inch | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Cast |
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
Engine
| Engine Type | 4 - stroke, SOHC 4-Valve, Liquid Cooled, Triple Spark, BSIV Compliant DTS-i Engine | 4-stroke, 1-cylinder, Air-cooled |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 199.5 cc | 155 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 23.5 PS @ 9500 rpm | 14.1 PS @ 8000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 18.3 Nm @ 8000 rpm | 14 Nm @ 6000 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs4 | bs4 |
| Bore | 56 mm | |
| Stroke | 62.9 mm | |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 5 Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 4.86s | 5.53s |
| Quarter Mile | 20.07 s @ 99.98 kmph | |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | 16.47m | 17.06 m,m |
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | 31.47 mm | |
| Mileage (City) | 50.58 kmpl | |
| Mileage (Highway) | 39.7 kmpl | 49.7 kmpl |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 36.1 kmpl | |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | 12.58s | 20.10s |
| Braking 60-0 km/h | 16.47m | 17.06 m,m |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic with Anti-friction Bush | Telescopic |
| Chassis | Perimeter Frame | |
| Suspension-Rear | Nitrox mono shock absorber with Canister | Swing Arm, Mono Suspension |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-130/70-17 | Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-140/60-17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-17 inch, Rear:-17 inch | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | Yes | Yes |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Cast |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 25 psi | 29 psi |
Dimensions
| Length*Width*Height | 2017*804*1075 | 2020*800*1035 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1363 mm | 1335 mm |
| Length | 2017 mm | 2020 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 169 mm | 160 mm |
| Height | 1075 mm | 1035 mm |
| Seat Height | 795 mm | |
| Width | 804 mm | 800 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 12 L | 12 L |
| Tail Light | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 300 mm | |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 230 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | MF | Maintenance Free |
| LED tail lights | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | Bulb | Bulb |
Features
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Naked Bikes, Sports Bikes | Sports Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ||
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Split | Split |
| Pass Switch | Yes | Yes |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Tachometer | Analogue | |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | Yes | Yes |
| Clock | ||
| Stepup Seat | ||
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Cooling System | Liquid Cooled | Air Cooled |
| Console | Analogue and Digital | Digital |
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
Warranty
| Standard Warranty (Years) | 2 | |
| Standard Warranty (kilometers) | 30000 |
Also Read Comparison Reviews of :
Similar Bike Comparisons
-
2019 GixxerRs. 1.00 lakhvs2019 Gixxer vs Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0Rs. 1.12 lakh
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which is better Bajaj Pulsar NS200 or Suzuki Gixxer 2019?
- Bajaj Pulsar NS200 could be a better option if you are looking for a more powerful naked-street bike. Powering the Pulsar NS200 is a 199.5cc DTS-i engine that churns out 23.5PS of maximum power and 18.3Nm of peak torque. The bike offers sporty styling and good over-all performance at an affordable price tag. Moreover, do take a test ride of the bike for a better insight into the performance and handling. Click on the link for - Bajaj Bike Showrooms
- Ns200 better
- Suzuki
Q. Which one is better Pulsar NS200 or Tvs apache rtr 2004v?
- I have always been a fan of Pulsar Ns 200, but when it comes to Engine refinement and exhaust sound there is no comaprison to Apache rtr 200 4v. Now coming to Engine power, Ns has quite powerful output in terms of bhp which 23.7 in comparison to Apache mere 20.73 bhp. Also Ns has 0.3 Nm more torque than Apache.When it comes to long crusing over highways, Pulsar beats Apache at its peak with 6 gearbox as compared to Apache's 5 gearbox which helps Pulsar to attain top speed of around 145-150kmph. Both bikes have equal milegae output ie. Somewhere between 38-45kmpl (depends on how you drive)I just bought a New pulsar Ns 2019 Abs, clocked at around 178 kms and i guarantee you that i have never been more happier in my life.Only thing i miss in Pulsar 200Ns is Exhaust but seriously that is no big issue, you can install a much powerful exhaust (Akrapovic) which comes around 4000-6000 INR, and trust its the best exhaust avilable out there, put in some K&N air filters, use Motul Synthetic oil, install Hydraulic lever and you have got the Beast on two wheels. (These are the ideas from my Pulsar 200Ns, i assure you next time you see a Apache 200 rtr 4v on a highway, you are gonna pass it over like its a piece of cake on wheels😅 lol. Goodluck with your machine.
- In our comparison test with the TVS Apache RTR 200 4V, the NS200 came across as a well-balanced package that’s ideal for your daily city runs, occasional highway cruising and even for some fun on the twisties. The Bajaj Pulsar NS200 offers a lot more grunt, better-stopping power and well-balanced ergonomics in comparison to the TVS Apache RTR 200 4V. It also feels a lot more relaxed at high speeds. The TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is a comfortable city bike with plenty of grunt and agility for a quick race off the traffic lights and to tackle some twisties as well. But the engine feels too strained out on the highway. Also, ergonomically, with the high-set footpegs it’s a tight spot for someone taller than 5 feet 10 inches. Even the brakes fail to inspire confidence under hard braking. Luckily though, TVS does offer ABS as an option. But then, the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 also gets ABS, a single-channel unit. Apart from that, the Bajaj is also a more well rounded motorcycle that does everything just right. The ride quality too is better on the Bajaj. So, if your daily riding consists more of city commutes, the TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is the way to go. But if you are looking to ride your bike out on the highway as well, the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is a more potent tool to opt for.
- Pulsar NS200 falls in the price range of Rs. 1.0 to 1.11 lakh (Ex-showroom, Delhi). The naked street-fighter retains the single cylinder, liquid cooled, triple spark, 199.5cc DTS-i engine which generates 23.5PS of maximum power at 9500rpm and 18.3Nm of peak torque at 8000rpm. It comes with an option of single-channel ABS as well & has claimed mileage of 30kmpl with a top speed of 135kmph. To know more, click on the link: https://bit.ly/2oX2IeV On the other hand, Apache 200 4V priced between Rs. 96,000-1.09 lakh (Ex-showroom, Delhi). It is the new iteration of TVS's 200cc motercycle which is equipped with slipper clutch that reduces the clutch lever effort and its 197cc air and oil-cooled single cylinder motor comes in two variants: carburetted and fuel injected. The carburetted mill makes 20.5PS at 8500rpm while the fuel injected one makes a slightly higher 21PS at 8500rpm. In safety feature RTR 200 has optional dual channel ABS that reduces the breaking distance while improving the staibility. To churn out more, click on the link: https://bit.ly/2ruIPJp You can compare these two bikes on the following link: https://bit.ly/2pdyKl9
Q. Which one is best pulsar NS200 or R15 V3?
- Ns200 is a Naked bike and r15 is a Full faring bike it is up to you which type of bike you want ,r15 is a track oriented bike and its riding posture is not so comfortable, if you ride a bike for long distance then it is not preferable and ns is a street oriented bike whith great power , look wise both bike has different., power on the both bike is good ,. in R15 it is powerful bike in 150cc segment and Ns200 is also has great power in 200 cc segment with lower price.
- Yamaha YZF R15 V3's more committed ergonomics make for an uncomfortable ride in the city. If you are looking for a dynamically competent bike that you’d like to hone your riding skills on and don't mind the committed riding position, the Yamaha R15 v 3.0 is the one to go for. It's a bike we'd love to have in our garage but its ergonomics limit its practicality. That's the reason it can not be our primary everyday bike. On the other hand, Pulsar NS200 comes across as a well-rounded package that can efficiently take on almost every kind of task required. Be it charging into corners, riding flat out on highways or manage daily chores with ease, the Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 makes a strong case for itself. It offers good grunt, stopping power and well-balanced ergonomics which makes it an all-rounder. Do take a test ride in order to pick one.
- Well the r15 looks really cool,however its a 150 cc so it will perform well if a rider weighs 50-70 kgs above that the power to weight ratio will be reduced. Ns on the other hand loves to be revved & it performs really brutal & fast after 6k rpm & above. Alot more factors are there like city usage,weight,fuel efficiency etc. Both the bikes also get different riding position so the r15 is more track focused sorts & the NS is more of street/naked bike, Hence the purpose of bike usage & the weight determines alot to select a bike between r15 & ns200. Also what sushant commented is right the R15 is more refined though
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
