Aprilia SXR 160 vs Yamaha Aerox 155

Yamaha Aerox 155 Price starts at Rs. 1.45 Lakh which is Rs. 12,356 costlier than base model of Aprilia SXR 160 priced at Rs. 1.32 Lakh. The claimed mileage of Aprilia SXR 160 is 35 kmpl whereas the mileage of Yamaha Aerox 155 is 45 kmpl. In technical specifications, Aprilia SXR 160 is powered by 160.03 cc engine , while Yamaha Aerox 155 is powered by 155 cc engine. Aprilia SXR 160 is available in 4 different colours while Yamaha Aerox 155 comes with 3 colours. The Comparison Aprilia SXR 160 vs Yamaha Aerox 155 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

SXR 160 vs Aerox 155

Key Highlights SXR 160 STDAerox 155 STD
Engine Type Single cylinder, 4 Stroke,SOHC 3 valve Liquid cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve
Max Power 11.09 PS @ 7200 rpm 15 PS @ 8000 rpm

SXR 160 vs Aerox 155 Key Highlights

Basic Info Aprilia SXR 160 STDYamaha Aerox 155 STD
Rating
59 reviews
154 reviews
Brand Name Aprilia Yamaha
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.32 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 1.45 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type Single cylinder, 4 Stroke,SOHC 3 valve Liquid cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve
Max Power 11.09 PS @ 7200 rpm 15 PS @ 8000 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Aprilia SXR 160 Colors
Yamaha Aerox 155 Colors
Braking Type Combi Brake System ...
Wheel Size Front :-304.8 mm, Rear :-304.8 mm Front :-355.6 mm,Rear :-355.6 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Single Channel Single Channel
Starting Kick and Self Start Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
EMI
Rs. 3,808 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Rs. 4,164 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 10,913 SXR 160 Insurance Rs. 11,120 Aerox 155 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Spark Plugs
1 Per Cylinder
1 Per Cylinder
Valves (per cylinder)
3
2
Claimed Top Speed
93 kmph
111 kmph
Emission Norm Compliance
BS6.2
BS6.2
Flex Fuel Blend
...
E20
Engine Type
Single cylinder, 4 Stroke,SOHC 3 valve
Liquid cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve
Engine Displacement
160.03 cc
155 cc
Gear Box
CVT
V-Belt Automatic
Max Power
11.09 PS @ 7200 rpm
15 PS @ 8000 rpm
Max Torque
12.13 Nm @ 5400 rpm
13.9 Nm @ 6500 rpm
Bore
58 mm
58.0 mm
Stroke
60.6 mm
58.7 mm
Number Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Belt Drive
Belt Drive
Fuel System
...
Fuel Injection
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
Electronic EMS
TCI
Compression Ratio
8.8:1
11.6:1

Front Brake
Disc
Disc
Rear Brake
Drum
Drum
Front Caliper
2 Piston
1 Piston
Braking Type
Combi Brake System
...

Mileage (Overall)
35 kmpl
48.62 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
...
18.51s
0-40 Kmph (sec)
...
3.30s
Braking 60-0 km/h
...
20.32m

Suspension-Front
Hydraulic double telescopic
Telescopic Fork
Suspension-Rear
Hydraulic shock absorber
Unit Swing

Front Tyre Pressure (Rider)
1.8 kg/cm2 / 26 psi
29 psi
Front Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
1.8 kg/cm2 / 26 psi
29 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider)
2.0 kg/cm2 / 29 psi
33 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
2.2 kg/cm2 / 32 psi
33 psi
Tyre Size
Front :-120/70-12, Rear :- 120/70-12
Front :- 110/80-14, Rear :- 140/70-14
Wheel Size
Front :-304.8 mm, Rear :-304.8 mm
Front :-355.6 mm,Rear :-355.6 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy

Seat height
775 mm
790 mm
Fuel Tank Reserve Capacity
1.5 L
1.3 L
Front Storage Compartment
...
Engine Oil Capacity
800 ml
...
Length*Width*Height
1963*803*1205 mm3
1980*700*1150 mm3
Wheelbase
1361 mm
1350 mm
Length
1963 mm
1980 mm
Ground Clearance
160 mm
145 mm
Height
1205 mm
1150 mm
Width
803 mm
700 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity
7 L
5.5 L
Kerb Weight
129 Kg
126 Kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Front Brake Size
220 mm
230 mm
Rear Brake Size
140 mm
130 mm

Battery Type
Lead Acid
...
Call/SMS Alerts
...
USB charging port
Headlight
LED
LED
Battery Capacity
12V / 5AH
12V / 6AH
Pilot Lamps
...
Seat Opening Switch
...
Boot Light
...

Frame Type
Tubular chassis with open single cradle
Underbone
Digital Display Type
...
LCD Connectivity
Malfunction Indicator
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Real Time Mileage Indicator
Vehicle Location Tracking
...
Pillion Seat
Pillion Grab Rail
Calls and Messaging
...
Kick Start
...
Traction Control
...
Low battery alert
...
Brightness Control
...
No. of Tripmeters
1
2
Engine Temperature Indicator
...
Rear Footpegs
Daytime Running Lamps
...
Additional Features/Information
...
VVA, Y-Connect, E20 Compatible, Oil Change Tripmeter, Hazard Warning, Smart Motor Generator System
Average Fuel Economy Indicator
...
ABS Type
Single Channel
Single Channel
Distance To Empty
...
Side Stand Warning
...
ABS
Single Channel
Single Channel
Body Graphics
Instrument Console Type
Digital
Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
...
Bluetooth
Starting
Kick and Self Start
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Split
Pass Beam Switch
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Mobile Application
...
Tachometer
Digital
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
External Fuel Filling
...
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
...
Low Oil Indicator
...
Passenger Backrest
...
Carry hook
Underseat storage
24.5 L
Cooling System
Air Cooled
Liquid Cooled
Key Shutter Lock
...
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Service Due Indicator
...

Vehicle Warranty
5 Years or 60,000 Km
2 Years or 30,000 Km
4th Service
8500-9000 Kms
10000 Kms
Standard Warranty (Years)
5
2
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
60000
30000

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Aprilia SXR 160
  • Striking maxi-scooter styling
  • Smooth and responsive performance
  • Great overall high-speed stability
Yamaha Aerox 155
  • Amazing performance
  • Incredible handling
  • Sporty looks
  • Generous under-seat storage
Aprilia SXR 160
  • Stiff suspension setup leads to uncomfortable riding experience
  • Brake lever feel could have been better
  • Not much comfort and space for a maxi-scooter
Yamaha Aerox 155
  • Jarring ride quality
  • Brakes not powerful enough
  • No floor space

Is Yamaha Aerox 155 Better Than Aprilia SXR 160?

64% users have chosen Yamaha Aerox 155 over Aprilia SXR 160 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 448 users have also rated Yamaha Aerox 155 and Aprilia SXR 160 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Yamaha Aerox 155 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage, performance, comfort and maintenance in your bike. But Aprilia SXR 160 is better on the grounds of features.

Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Aerox 155 SXR 160
Mileage 4.2 3.3
Performance 4.5 4.3
Comfort 4.2 4.1
Maintenance 3.9 3.4
Features 4.5 4.6
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Yamaha Aerox 155 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Aprilia SRX 125 vs Aprilia SRX 160 which one is best for daily commuting monthly usage 200km?
  • Both are good in their forte. Aprilia SXR 125 is a feature-rich scooter and comes with a digital instrument cluster, LED illumination, alloy wheels, USB port, combined braking system, etc. If you were wowed by the Aprilia SXR 160’s Italian flair but dejected by its hefty price tag, then the SXR 125 could be an ideal pick. Arguably, the SXR grabs. On the other hand, Aprilia SXR 160 if you want something that is big, comfy and feature-loaded, you could save a huge chunk of money and get the Suzuki Burgman Street 125 instead. The only reason why you would want to get this scooter then is to have an Aprilia in your garage--and even then it isn’t the most cost-conscious way to go about it. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
Q. How does Aprilia SXR 160 and Burgman compete?
  • Selecting the right scooter would depend on several factors such as your budget preference, features required, cabin space, engine options, brand preference, etc. If you’re in the market for a sporty, premium, and ‘hatke’ scooter, the SXR 160 could be the one to pick. However, it is one of the most expensive scooters on sale, and given its performance and features and we don’t think it justifies the premium pricing. If you’re in the market for a maxi-style scooter, our suggestion will be to opt for the Suzuki Burgman Street as it offers more space, comfort, and fuel efficiency while being significantly more affordable. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership.
Q. What is the difference between Suzuki Burgman Street and Aprilia SXR 160E? Specially boot space & seating capacity.
  • If you’re in the market for a maxi-style scooter, our suggestion will be to opt for the Suzuki Burgman Street as it offers more space, comfort and fuel efficiency while being significantly more affordable. Even if we keep the price aspect aside, the Aprilia SXR 160 misses out on the basic ethos of a maxi-scooter, which is comfort and space! For a detailed comparison, click on the following link: Aprilia SXR 160 vs Suzuki Burgman Street.

Aprilia SXR 160 Vs Yamaha Aerox 155 FAQs

Which bike is best between Aprilia SXR 160 vs Yamaha Aerox 155?
As per the users experiences Aprilia SXR 160 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for features in your bike. But Yamaha Aerox 155 is better on the grounds of mileage, performance, comfort and maintenance.
Which bike is cheaper Aprilia SXR 160 vs Yamaha Aerox 155?
The Aprilia SXR 160 is cheaper than Yamaha Aerox 155 by ₹12,356.
Which bike offers better performance Aprilia SXR 160 vs Yamaha Aerox 155?
For the STD version, 160.03 cc Petrol engine of SXR 160 produces 11.09 PS @ 7200 rpm of power and 12.13 Nm @ 5400 rpm of torque. Whereas for the STD version, 155 cc Petrol engine of Aerox 155 produces 15 PS @ 8000 rpm of power and 13.9 Nm @ 6500 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Aprilia SXR 160 has better performance.

Images of Yamaha Aerox 155 and Aprilia SXR 160

  1. Home
  2. New Bikes
  3. Compare Bikes
  4. Aprilia SXR 160 vs Yamaha Aerox 155
×