Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Yamaha FZ-FI V3
Last Updated: October 21, 2026
Yamaha FZ-FI V3 price starts at Rs. 1.18 Lakh, which is Rs. 19,880 cheaper than the base variant of Royal Enfield Hunter 350, priced at Rs. 1.38 Lakh. In terms of mileage, the Hunter 350 offers a claimed 36.2 kmpl, while the FZ-FI Version 3.0 delivers 49.3 kmpl. On the performance front, the Hunter 350 uses a 349cc engine producing 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm and the FZ-FI Version 3.0 a 149cc engine producing 12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm. If you're deciding between the Hunter 350 and FZ-FI Version 3.0, the FZ-FI Version 3.0 is the better pick for affordability and mileage, while the Hunter 350 stands out for performance.
...Read More
Hunter 350 vs FZ-FI Version 3.0 Comparison Summary
| Specification | Royal Enfield Hunter 350 | Yamaha FZ-FI V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Ex-showroom price (base) | Rs. 1.38 Lakh | Rs. 1.18 Lakh |
| Mileage | 36.2 kmpl | 49.3 kmpl |
| Engine | 349 cc | 149 cc |
| Max power | 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm | 12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm |
| Kerb weight | 177 Kg | 135 Kg |
-
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
Rs. 1.38 Lakh EMI - Rs. 3,965 View October OffersYamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0
Rs. 1.18 Lakh EMI - Rs. 3,393 View October Offers
Hunter 350 vs FZ-FI Version 3.0 Key Highlights
| Basic Info | Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Base | Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0 STD |
|---|---|---|
| Rating |
866 reviews
|
261 reviews
|
| Brand Name | Royal Enfield | Yamaha |
| Ex-Showroom Price | Rs. 1.38 Lakh Check On Road Price | Rs. 1.18 Lakh Check On Road Price |
| Engine Type | Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled | Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve |
| Max Power | 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm | 12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Colors | ||
| Braking Type | Anti-lock Braking System | Not Available |
| Wheel Size | Front :-17 Inch,Rear :-17 Inch | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Spoke | Alloy |
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Analogue | Digital |
| EMI |
Rs. 3,965
@
9.45% (36 months)
|
Rs. 3,393
@
9.45% (36 months)
|
| Insurance | Rs. 11,005 Hunter 350 Insurance | Rs. 6,788 FZ-FI Version 3.0 Insurance |
| Brochure |
Download
Brochure
|
Download
Brochure
|
Engine |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brakes |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Suspension |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tyres |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dimensions |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electricals |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Features |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service Cost |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warranty |
|
Pros and Cons
- Positives
- Negatives
- Frugal motor, Comfortable riding stance, Muscular design
- Not so peppy engine, Fit and finish isn’t as good
Is Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Better Than Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0?
57% users have chosen Royal Enfield Hunter 350 over Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 2250 users have also rated Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0 is better on the grounds of mileage. On the basis of performance, comfort, maintenance and features user have rated both the bikes equally.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..
| Ratings Factor | Hunter 350 | FZ-FI Version 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Mileage | 3.9 | 4.2 |
| Performance | 4.4 | 4.3 |
| Comfort | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Maintenance | 3.8 | 3.8 |
| Features | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Videos of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes
Latest News on Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0
Recently Asked User Questions
- HUNTER 350
- Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
- The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Vs Yamaha FZ-FI V3 FAQs
Images of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Yamaha FZ-FI V3
- Home ›
- New Bikes ›
- Compare Bikes ›
- Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Yamaha FZ-FI V3









