Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Price starts at Rs. 1.38 Lakh which is Rs. 21,300 costlier than base model of Yamaha FZ-FI V3 priced at Rs. 1.16 Lakh. The claimed mileage of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is 36.2 kmpl whereas the mileage of Yamaha FZ-FI V3 is 49.3 kmpl. In technical specifications, Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is powered by 349 cc engine , while Yamaha FZ-FI V3 is powered by 149 cc engine. Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is available in 10 different colours while Yamaha FZ-FI V3 comes with 2 colours. The Comparison Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Yamaha FZ-FI V3 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Hunter 350 vs FZ-FI Version 3.0

Key Highlights Hunter 350 BaseFZ-FI Version 3.0 STD
Engine Type Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve
Max Power 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm 12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm

Hunter 350 vs FZ-FI Version 3.0 Key Highlights

Basic Info Royal Enfield Hunter 350 BaseYamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0 STD
Rating
855 reviews
257 reviews
Brand Name Royal Enfield Yamaha
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.38 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 1.16 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve
Max Power 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm 12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0 Colors
Braking Type Anti-lock Braking System ...
Wheel Size Front :-17 Inch,Rear :-17 Inch Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Spoke Alloy
ABS Single Channel Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Analogue Digital
EMI
Rs. 3,965 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Rs. 3,352 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 11,005 Hunter 350 Insurance Rs. 6,761 FZ-FI Version 3.0 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Spark Plugs
1 Per Cylinder
1 Per Cylinder
Valves (per cylinder)
2
2
Claimed Top Speed
114 kmph
115 kmph
Emission Norm Compliance
BS6.2
BS6.2
Flex Fuel Blend
E20
E20
Engine Type
Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled
Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve
Engine Displacement
349 cc
149 cc
Gear Box
5 Speed
5 Speed
Max Power
20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm
Max Torque
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
13.3 Nm @ 5500 rpm
Bore
72 mm
57.3 mm
Stroke
85.8 mm
57.9 mm
Number Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Fuel System
Electronic Injection
Fuel Injection
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
Electronic Fuel Injection
...
Compression Ratio
9.5 : 1
9.6 : 1

Front Brake
Disc
Disc
Rear Brake
Drum
Disc
Front Caliper
2 Piston
2 Piston
Rear Caliper
1 Piston
1 Piston
Braking Type
Anti-lock Braking System
...

Mileage (Overall)
36.2 kmpl
49.3 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
16.40s
...
Braking 60-0 km/h
18.13m
...

Rear Suspension Preload Adjustment
...
Rear Suspension Travel / Wheel Travel
100 mm
...
Suspension-Front
Telescopic, 41mm forks
Telescopic fork
Suspension-Rear
Twin shock absorbers with 6-step adjustable preload
7-Step Adjustable Monocross Suspension

Front Tyre Pressure (Rider)
29 psi
26 psi
Front Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
29 psi
26 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider)
32 psi
30 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
33 psi
30 psi
Brake Fluid Grade
DOT4
...
Tyre Size
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Front :-100/80-17,Rear :-140/60-17
Wheel Size
Front :-17 Inch,Rear :-17 Inch
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Make
CEAT
...
Tyre Type
Tube
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
...
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Spoke
Alloy

Seat height
790 mm
790 mm
Load carrying capacity
179 kg
...
Fuel Tank Reserve Capacity
2.6 L
2 L
Gross Weight
360 kg
...
Engine Oil Capacity
2.2 L
...
Engine Oil Grade
SAE 15W 50 API SL grade JASO MA2 semi synthetic
...
Length*Width*Height
2055*810*1070 mm3
1990*790*1080 mm3
Wheelbase
1370 mm
1330 mm
Length
2055 mm
1990 mm
Ground Clearance
160 mm
165 mm
Height
1070 mm
1080 mm
Width
810 mm
790 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity
13 L
13 L
Kerb Weight
177 Kg
135 Kg
Tail Light
Bulb
Bulb
Front Brake Size
300 mm
282 mm
Rear Brake Size
153 mm
220 mm

Battery Type
Lead Acid
...
Roadside assistance
Optional
...
USB charging port
Type C
...
Headlight
Halogen
LED
Battery Capacity
12V / 8AH
...

Frame Type
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
Diamond
Digital Display Type
LCD
LCD Connectivity
Malfunction Indicator
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Pillion Seat
Pillion Grab Rail
Navigation assist
...
Riding Modes
...
Low battery alert
...
No. of Tripmeters
3
2
Rear Footpegs
Multi-function Lock
...
Daytime Running Lamps
...
Additional Features/Information
Wet sump, forced lubrication, Paper element Air Cleaner
ECO Indicator
ABS Type
Single Channel
Single Channel
Side Stand Warning
...
Physical Key
...
Exhaust Heat Shield
...
Front Footpegs
Forward-set
...
Body
Metal
...
Instrument Cluster Control Switchcube
...
ABS
Single Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Roadster Bikes
Sports Bikes
Instrument Console Type
Analogue and Digital
Digital
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Split
Pass Beam Switch
Speedometer
Analogue
Digital
Tachometer
Digital
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
...
Low Oil Indicator
...
Cooling System
Air & Oil Cooled
Air Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
...
Service Due Indicator
...

Vehicle Warranty
3 Years or 30,000 Km
2 Years or 30,000 Km
4th Service
15000 Km / 18 Months
10000 Kms
Standard Warranty (Years)
3
2
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
30000
30000

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • Offering easy accessibility
Yamaha FZ-FI V3
  • Frugal motor, Comfortable riding stance, Muscular design
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well
  • Absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity
Yamaha FZ-FI V3
  • Not so peppy engine, Fit and finish isn’t as good

Is Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Better Than Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0?

57% users have chosen Royal Enfield Hunter 350 over Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 2247 users have also rated Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for performance, comfort and features in your bike. But Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0 is better on the grounds of mileage. On the basis of maintenance user have rated both the bikes equally.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Hunter 350 FZ-FI Version 3.0
Mileage 3.9 4.2
Performance 4.4 4.3
Comfort 4.5 4.4
Maintenance 3.8 3.8
Features 4.4 4.3
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Review and Win Banner

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Yamaha FZ-FI V3 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.
|Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Community

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Vs Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0 FAQs

Which bike is best between Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0?
As per the users experiences Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for performance, comfort and features in your bike. But Yamaha FZ-FI V3 is better on the grounds of mileage. On the basis of maintenance user have rated both the bikes equally.
Which bike is cheaper Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0?
The Yamaha FZ-FI V3 is cheaper than Royal Enfield Hunter 350 by ₹21,300.
Which bike offers better performance Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0?
For the Base version, 349 cc Petrol engine of Hunter 350 produces 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the STD version, 149 cc Petrol engine of FZ-FI Version 3.0 produces 12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm of power and 13.3 Nm @ 5500 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 has better performance.

Images of Yamaha FZ-FI V3 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Which one do you like more?
Hunter 350
Hunter 350
FZ-FI Version 3.0
FZ-FI Version 3.0
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0
×