KTM RC 160 vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0

Last Updated: August 19, 2026

Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 price starts at Rs. 1.64 Lakh, which is Rs. 35,901 cheaper than the base variant of KTM RC 160, priced at Rs. 2.00 Lakh. In terms of mileage, the RC 160 offers a claimed 36 kmpl, while the MT 15 Version 2.0 delivers 56.87 kmpl. On the performance front, the RC 160 uses a 164.2cc engine producing 19 PS @ 9500 rpm and the MT 15 Version 2.0 a 155cc engine producing 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm. If you're deciding between the RC 160 and MT 15 Version 2.0, the MT 15 Version 2.0 is the better pick for affordability and mileage, while the RC 160 stands out for performance.

...Read More

RC 160 vs MT 15 Version 2.0 Comparison Summary

Specification KTM RC 160Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
Ex-showroom price (base) Rs. 2.00 LakhRs. 1.64 Lakh
Mileage 36 kmpl56.87 kmpl
Engine 164.2 cc155 cc
Max power 19 PS @ 9500 rpm18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm
Kerb weight 155 Kg141 Kg

RC 160 vs MT 15 Version 2.0 Key Highlights

Basic Info KTM RC 160 STDYamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 Metallic Black
Rating
1 review
1676 reviews
Brand Name KTM Yamaha
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 2.00 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 1.64 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type 4 Stroke, Single Cylinder, SOHC, Internal Combustion Engine Liquid Cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve
Max Power 19 PS @ 9500 rpm 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
KTM RC 160 Colors
Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 Colors
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm Rear :-431.8 mm inch
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
EMI
Rs. 5,484 @ 6% (36 months)
Rs. 4,736 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 12,058 RC 160 Insurance Rs. 11,455 MT 15 Version 2.0 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Spark Plugs
1 Per Cylinder
1 Per Cylinder
Valves (per cylinder)
Not Available
4
Claimed Top Speed
118 kmph
122 kmph
Emission Norm Compliance
bs6.2
bs6.2
Flex Fuel Blend
Not Available
E20
Engine Type
4 Stroke, Single Cylinder, SOHC, Internal Combustion Engine
Liquid Cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve
Engine Displacement
164.2 cc
155 cc
Gear Box
6 Speed
6 Speed
Max Power
19 PS @ 9500 rpm
18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm
Max Torque
15.5 Nm @ 7500 rpm
14.1 Nm @ 7500 rpm
Bore
66 mm
58.0 mm
Stroke
48 mm
58.7 mm
Number Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Fuel System
Electronic Injection
Fuel Injection
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
Inductive
Not Available
Compression Ratio
11.97:1
11.6 : 1

Front Brake
Disc
Disc
Rear Brake
Disc
Disc
Front Caliper
Not Available
2 Piston
Rear Caliper
Not Available
1 Piston

Mileage (Overall)
36 kmpl
56.87 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
Not Available
14.28s
Braking 60-0 km/h
Not Available
19.79m
Power to Weight Ratio
0.12
Not Available
City Mileage (Tested)
Not Available
56.87 kmpl
Highway Mileage (Tested)
Not Available
47.94 kmpl
Braking 80-0 km/h
Not Available
35.05m
Braking 100-0 km/h
Not Available
58.20m
Estimated Mileage
Not Available
45-50 kmpl
Roll-ons 30-70 kmph (3rd Gear)
Not Available
5.85s
Roll-ons 40-80 kmph (4th Gear)
Not Available
7.54s
Fuel Gauge
Digital
Digital

Suspension-Front
WP APEX USD forks, 37 mm diameter, Travel - 130 mm
Telescopic Upside Down Front Fork, Dia. 37 mm
Suspension-Rear
Canister Monoshock, 6 step Adjustable, Travel - 165 mm
Linked Type Monocross Suspension

Front Tyre Pressure (Rider)
Not Available
32 psi
Front Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
Not Available
32 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider)
Not Available
36 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
Not Available
39 psi
Tyre Size
Front :-110/70-17, , Rear :-140/60-17
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/70R-17
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm Rear :-431.8 mm inch
Tyre Make
MRF
Not Available
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
Not Available
Yes
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy

Dry Weight
148 kg
Not Available
Seat height
830 mm
810 mm
Load carrying capacity
150 kg
Not Available
Fuel Tank Reserve Capacity
Not Available
1.6 L
Gross Weight
305 kg
Not Available
Engine Oil Capacity
1.4 L
Not Available
Length*Width*Height
1965*701*1150 mm3
2015*800*1070 mm3
Wheelbase
1347 mm
1325 mm
Length
1965 mm
2015 mm
Ground Clearance
168 mm
170 mm
Height
1150 mm
1070 mm
Width
701 mm
800 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity
13.7 L
10 L
Kerb Weight
155 Kg
141 Kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Front Brake Size
320 mm
282 mm
Rear Brake Size
230 mm
220 mm

Call/SMS Alerts
Yes
Not Available
Headlight
LED
LED
Battery Capacity
12V / 8AH
12V / 4AH
Projector head light
Not Available
Yes
Pilot Lamps
Not Available
Yes

Frame Type
Split-Trellis Frame (Tubular), (Sub Frame - Newly engineered bolt-on subframe)
Deltabox
Digital Display Type
LCD
LCD
Malfunction Indicator
Yes
Yes
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Pillion Seat
Yes
Yes
Pillion Grab Rail
Yes
Not Available
Calls and Messaging
Yes
Not Available
Navigation assist
Yes
Not Available
Riding Modes
Off-Road,Super Moto
Not Available
Traction Control
Not Available
Yes
Kill Switch
Yes
Yes
Brightness Control
Not Available
Yes
No. of Tripmeters
Not Available
2
Engine Temperature Indicator
Yes
Not Available
Rear Footpegs
Yes
Yes
Daytime Running Lamps
Yes
Yes
Additional Features/Information
Not Available
Variable Valve Actuation (VVA)
Windscreen
Yes
Not Available
Gear Position Indicator
Yes
Yes
ABS Type
Dual Channel
Dual Channel
Distance To Empty
Yes
Not Available
Side Stand Warning
Yes
Yes
Handlebar type
Split handle bar
Not Available
ABS
Dual Channel
Dual Channel
Body Type
Sports Bikes
Sports Naked Bikes, Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
Yes
Yes
Instrument Console Type
Digital
Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
Bluetooth
Not Available
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Split
Pass Beam Switch
Yes
Yes
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Tachometer
Digital
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Yes
Yes
Clock
Yes
Yes
Low Oil Indicator
Not Available
Yes
Cooling System
Liquid Cooled
Liquid Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
Yes
Not Available
Service Due Indicator
Yes
Not Available
Saree Guard
Yes
Yes
Shift Light
Not Available
Yes

1st Service
Not Available
1000 Kms / 1 Month
2nd Service
Not Available
5000 Kms / 5 Months
3rd Service
Not Available
9000 Kms / 9 Months
4th Service
Not Available
13000 Kms

Vehicle Warranty
2 Years or 30,000 Km
2 Years or 30,000 Km
Standard Warranty (Years)
2
2
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
30000
30000

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
KTM RC 160
  • Sporty, race-focused styling
  • Powerful and high-revving engine
Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
  • A refined engine
  • Sporty handling, and nimble
  • Looks aggressive
KTM RC 160
  • Narrow pillion seat
  • No traction control
Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
  • Lacks bottom end grunt
  • Stiff suspension
  • Pillion seat is not comfortable
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Review and Win Banner

Latest News on KTM RC 160 and Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. What should I buy between Yamaha MT 15 V2 and R15S?
  • Yes
  • MT 15 V2 bike
  • Both the bikes are good in their forte. The updates as expected have made the new MT-15 a better bike. It looks more premium, handles better and the addition of a few new features is welcome. But we were expecting more from Yamaha! The dullness of the engine is disappointing and the lack of dual-channel ABS is just beyond any reasoning with this performance on tap. As for goodies such as a quick-shifter and traction control, they should have been offered as part of a premium variant. On the other hand, the Yamaha R15S remains one potent small-capacity supersport for beginners. In its version 3.0 guise, it has become sharper and more focused, making it great for sport riding or trac enthusiasts. However, the aggressive riding stance could cause discomfort if you intend to use the bike for daily commuting and the quality of components have also gone down. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride for a better understanding of performance and comfort. Click on the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
Q. Which bike is the best between, Yamaha MT-15 Version 2.0 or KTM 200 Duke?
  • Both the bikes are good in their forte. The design update has given the KTM 200 Duke a new lease of life. Also, the fact that the new BS6-compliant motor does not lose out on performance almost makes it feel like a win-win. That said, the substantial hike in price means it is now more expensive than larger motorcycles such as the Suzuki Gixxer 250. However, when it comes to thrills, the KTM 200 Duke delivers it in spades! On the other hand, The updates as expected have made the new MT-15 a better bike. It looks more premium, handles better and the addition of a few new features is welcome. But we were expecting more from Yamaha! The dullness of the engine is disappointing and the lack of dual-channel ABS is just beyond any reasoning with this performance on tap. As for goodies such as a quick-shifter and traction control, they should have been offered as part of a premium variant. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.Read more -Yamaha MT-15 Version 2.0 Road Test Review - The Perfect Imperfection.

KTM RC 160 Vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 FAQs

Which bike is best between KTM RC 160 vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0?
KTM RC 160 has out rated Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 on all the rating factors.
Which bike is cheaper KTM RC 160 vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0?
The Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 is cheaper than KTM RC 160 by ₹35,901.
Which bike offers better performance KTM RC 160 vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0?
For the STD version, 164.2 cc Petrol engine of RC 160 produces 19 PS @ 9500 rpm of power and 15.5 Nm @ 7500 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Metallic Black version, 155 cc Petrol engine of MT 15 Version 2.0 produces 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm of power and 14.1 Nm @ 7500 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the KTM RC 160 has better performance.

Images of Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 and KTM RC 160

Which one do you like more?
MT 15 Version 2.0
MT 15 Version 2.0
RC 160
RC 160
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. KTM RC 160 vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
×