Honda Activa 6G vs Suzuki Burgman Street Comparison
Honda Activa 6G vs Suzuki Burgman Street
Suzuki Burgman Street Price starts at Rs. 77,900 which is Rs. 13,988 costlier than Honda Activa 6G priced at Rs. 63,912. The claimed mileage for the Honda Activa 6G is NA where as the claimed mileage for Suzuki Burgman Street is 53.5 kmpl. In technical specifications, Honda Activa 6G is powered by 109.51 cc engine where as Suzuki Burgman Street is powered by 124 cc engine. Honda Activa 6G is available in 1 different colours while Suzuki Burgman Street comes with 1 colours. 77% users have chosen Suzuki Burgman Street over Honda Activa 6G in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Honda Activa 6G vs Suzuki Burgman Street on the basis of price, specifications & other features....read more
Activa 6G vs Burgman Street Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | Activa 6G Deluxe | Burgman Street STD |
|---|---|---|
| Ex-Showroom Price | Rs. 65,412View On Road Price | Rs. 77,900View On Road Price |
| Rating | 3.8 (88 Ratings) |
4.4 (253 Ratings) |
| Engine Type | Fan Cooled, 4 Stroke, SI Engine | Air Cooled, Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, SOHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 109.51 cc | 124 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 7.79 PS @ 8000 rpm | 8.7 PS @ 7000 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Colors | ||
| Brakes Front | Drum | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Drum | Drum |
| Braking Type | Combi Brake System | ... |
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 10.55s | 8.69s |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | ... | 53.5 kmpl |
| Wheel Size | Front :-304.8 mm,Rear :-254 mm | Front :-304.8 mm,Rear :-254 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Sheet Metal | Cast |
| ABS | no | no |
| Starting | Kick and Self Start | Kick and Self Start |
| Speedometer | Analogue | Digital |
Engine
| Engine Type | Fan Cooled, 4 Stroke, SI Engine | Air Cooled, Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, SOHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 109.51 cc | 124 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 7.79 PS @ 8000 rpm | 8.7 PS @ 7000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 8.79 Nm @ 5250 rpm | 10.2 Nm @5000 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs6 | bs4 |
| Bore | 47 mm | 52.5 mm |
| Stroke | 63.1 mm | 57.4 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Belt Drive | Belt Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Compression Ratio | 10.0±0.2 | ... |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| No Of Gears | CVT | CVT |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Drum | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Drum | Drum |
| Braking Type | Combi Brake System | ... |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 10.55s | 8.69s |
| Quarter Mile | ... | 23.02 s@ 88.01 kmph |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | ... | 21.56m |
| Mileage (City) | ... | 54.9 kmpl |
| Mileage (Highway) | ... | 54.7 kmpl |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | ... | 53.5 kmpl |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | ... | 16.78s |
| Braking 60-0 km/h | ... | 21.56m |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic | Telescopic |
| Chassis | Under Bone | ... |
| Suspension-Rear | 3-Step Adjustable Spring Loaded Hydraulic | Hydraulic Type |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-90/100-12, Rear :-90/100-10 | Front :-90/90-12, Rear :- 90/100-10 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-304.8 mm,Rear :-254 mm | Front :-304.8 mm,Rear :-254 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | ... | |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Sheet Metal | Cast |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 22 psi | ... |
Dimensions
| Length*Width*Height | 1833*697*1156 | 1880*675*1140 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1260 mm | 1265 mm |
| Length | 1833 mm | 1880 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 171 mm | 160 mm |
| Height | 1156 mm | 1140 mm |
| Seat Height | ... | 780 mm |
| Width | 697 mm | 675 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 5.3 L | 5.6 L |
| Tail Light | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 130 mm | ... |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 130 mm | ... |
Electricals
| Battery Type | ... | MF |
| LED tail lights | ... | |
| Seat Opening Switch | ... | |
| Turn Signal Lamp | LED | LED |
Features
| ABS | no | no |
| Starting | Kick and Self Start | Kick and Self Start |
| Seat Type | Single | Single |
| Pass Switch | ||
| Speedometer | Analogue | Digital |
| Tachometer | Analogue | ... |
| Trip Meter | Analogue | Digital |
| Charging point | ... | |
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | ... | |
| External Fuel Filling | ... | |
| Clock | ||
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Carry hook | ||
| Underseat storage | ... | 21.5 L |
| Cooling System | Air Cooled | Air Cooled |
| Console | Analogue | Digital |
| Shutter Lock | ... | |
| Odometer | Analogue | Digital |
Watch Videos of Activa 6G and Burgman Street
News Updates on Activa 6G and Burgman Street
-
Should You Get India’s Favourite Scooter Or Its Youthful Sibling?Same underpinnings. Same heart. Different appeal. Which one is the right fit?
Mar 20, 2020 | By Team ZigWheels -
Here’s The ‘New’ Suzuki Burgman Street!
Well, it’s not really all-new, just a BS6 update
Feb 17, 2020 | By Team ZigWheels -
Your BS6 Activa Or Dio Could Have An Issue
This problem pertains to the units produced between February 14-25
Mar 17, 2020 | By Team ZigWheels -
This Is The “New” BS6-compliant Suzuki Burgman Street
No, your eyes are not deceiving you. The new Burgman looks exactly like the old one
Feb 5, 2020 | By Team ZigWheels
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which one is best between Tvs ntorq & suzuki burgman?
- The throttle response of NTorq is sharp and there no vibrations even at the very top of the rev range. In fact, it is one of the very few scooters in India which can go above 100 kmph and we did see the NTorq touching the three digit mark on multiple occasions. But with the extra weight, the NTorq did lose out to the Burgman Street in outright acceleration. But the NTorq has a much better top end when compared to the Burgman Street. In terms of manoeuvrability, it is the NTorq, which feels easier to handle in traffic. You just feel a bit conscious of the bulk of the Burgman Street when filtering through traffic. The NTorq offers better ride quality than the Burgman Street. It has the right amount of balance. It takes on potholes and bumps confidently and is eager when showed a corner too. The Burgman Street loves corners; it is easy to dip into a corner and can hold its line too. But the ride quality is slightly stiffer than we would have liked. Definitely not a deal-breaker though.
- Burgman Street is powered by a 124.3cc, single-cylinder, air-cooled engine produces 8.7PS of power and 10.2Nm of torque which returns a claimed mileage of 53.5 kmpl. On the other hand, NTORQ 125 comes with 124.79 cc single cylinder, 4-Stroke, OHC engine which delivers 9.4 PS/ 10.5 Nm. As for the suspension on the Burgman, it felt a bit on the stiffer side but not uncomfortable in any way. Braking isn’t great either as it lacks feel and bite, although CBS, which comes in as standard, helps shed speeds safely. While, NTORQ 125 has better suspension system and 12 inch tyres rear rear and front which gives better handling and comfortable ride. NTORQ 125 delivers slightly more power whereas, Burgman Street is better fuel efficient and light weight. Click on the given link to compare both the scooters: https://bit.ly/2vzHDZl Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride in order clear your all doubts. Click on the given link to get your nearest authorized dealership details : https://bit.ly/2jv2aXQ
- Burgman Street is powered by a 124.3cc, single-cylinder, air-cooled engine produces 8.7PS of power and 10.2Nm of torque which returns a claimed mileage of 53.5 kmpl. On the other hand, NTORQ 125 comes with 124.79 cc single cylinder, 4-Stroke, OHC engine which delivers 9.4 PS/ 10.5 Nm. As for the suspension on the Burgman, it felt a bit on the stiffer side but not uncomfortable in any way. Braking isn’t great either as it lacks feel and bite, although CBS, which comes in as standard, helps shed speeds safely. While, NTORQ 125 has better suspension system and 12 inch tyres rear rear and front which gives better handling and comfortable ride. NTORQ 125 delivers slightly more power whereas, Burgman Street is better fuel efficient and light weight. Click on the given link to compare both the scooters: https://bit.ly/2vzHDZl Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride in order clear your all doubts. Click on the givn link to get your nearest authorised dealership details : https://bit.ly/2jv2aXQ
Q. Honda Activa 125 BS6 is good or Honda 6G is good?
- It would be unfair to give any sorts of the verdict as the Honda Activa 6G is yet to make its debut. Moreover, the 2019 Activa 125 is available with a 124 cc engine that makes 8.29PS of power while we expect Honda to stick with the same tried and tested 109.19cc HET air-cooled engine which produces 7.96PS of power for the Activa 6G. Honda is most likely to showcase the updated Activa 6G as the 2020 Auto Expo. Stay tuned for further updates.
Q. Which is better? Activa 125 or Burgman?
View More Questions
- Suzuki Burgman Street and Honda Activa 125, both the scooters have similar power figures. The Burgman Street’s sheer size has its benefits and it's quite clear here. It trumps the Activa 125 with three litres of extra under-seat storage space. Further, it features additional storage pockets laid out in the front apron too. It also comes with a slightly larger fuel tank, which when coupled with the fuel efficiency will keep you going for miles on end. The Burgman also gets a disc brake, which is offered as standard. The Activa, on the other hand, gets it only in its top-spec variant. Both scooters have their ups and downs. But which of the two should you choose? This essentially boils down to the price, features, aesthetics and performance. Although it is a bit on the pricier side, we genuinely believe the Burgman Street comes out on top. Even though the Burgman Street commands a premium of around Rs 4,000 over the Activa 125, you do get a lot more scooter for the price. Read more: Suzuki Burgman Street vs Honda Activa 125: Spec Comparison- https://bit.ly/2wdwb5j Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride in order to clear your all doubts. Click on the given to get your nearest dealership details: https://bit.ly/2jv2aXQ
- Both scooter are different segments and different perspective to useburgman is more like premium looking scooter. burgman power is way better than activa 125. but it is no flexibility to handle in traffic like activa. if you want normal looking scooter then go for Honda activa 125 and Suzuki access.if you want scooter for batter mileage then batter to inform you that my burgman city mileage is 37 kmplmy father Honda activa 2 years old mileage is 29-32 kmpl in city.
- The burgman scooter is kind of new technologies in Indian market .The chashis is very good in tough performance .This bike is inspired by 400 cc elder brother burgman,in Indian market 125 cc with all this features is good with led lighting,but compared to Honda Activa bs V1 ,Honda is value for money ,and trusted for almost every average indian .Suzuki burgman cost 88k werein Honda Activa just 69-75 new BS V1 launch
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
