Honda Activa 6G vs Honda Dio Comparison
Honda Activa 6G vs Honda Dio
Honda Activa 6G Price starts at Rs. 63,912 which is Rs. 9,671 costlier than Honda Dio priced at Rs. 54,241. The claimed mileage for the Honda Activa 6G is NA where as the claimed mileage for Honda Dio is 55 kmpl. In technical specifications, Honda Activa 6G is powered by 109.51 cc engine where as Honda Dio is powered by 109.19 cc engine. Honda Activa 6G is available in 1 different colours while Honda Dio comes with 7 colours. 67% users have chosen Honda Dio over Honda Activa 6G in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Honda Activa 6G vs Honda Dio on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Activa 6G vs Dio Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | Activa 6G Deluxe | Dio DLX |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Rs. 65,412 | Rs. 63,340 |
| Engine Type | Fan Cooled, 4 Stroke, SI Engine | Fan Cooled, 4 Stroke, SI Engine |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 109.51 cc | 109.19 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 7.79 PS @ 8000 rpm | 7.92 PS @ 7000 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Brakes Front | Drum | Drum |
| Brakes Rear | Drum | Drum |
| Braking Type | Combi Brake System | Combi Brake System |
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 10.55s | 9.36s |
| Wheel Size | Front :-304.8 mm,Rear :-254 mm | Front :-254 mm, Rear :-254 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Sheet Metal | Alloy |
| ABS | no | no |
| Starting | Kick and Self Start | Kick and Self Start |
| Speedometer | Analogue | Digital |
Engine
| Engine Type | Fan Cooled, 4 Stroke, SI Engine | Fan Cooled, 4 Stroke, SI Engine |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 109.51 cc | 109.19 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 7.79 PS @ 8000 rpm | 7.92 PS @ 7000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 8.79 Nm @ 5250 rpm | 8.91 Nm @ 5500 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs6 | bs4 |
| Bore | 47 mm | 50 mm |
| Stroke | 63.1 mm | 55.6 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Belt Drive | Belt Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Compression Ratio | 10.0±0.2 | 9.5:1 |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| No Of Gears | CVT | CVT |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Drum | Drum |
| Brakes Rear | Drum | Drum |
| Braking Type | Combi Brake System | Combi Brake System |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 10.55s | 9.36s |
| Quarter Mile | ... | 23.75 s@83.75 kmph |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | ... | 22.55m |
| Mileage (City) | ... | 55 Kmpl |
| Mileage (Highway) | ... | 59.5 kmpl |
| Mileage (Overall) | ... | 56 kmpl |
| Braking 60-0 km/h | ... | 22.55m |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic | Spring Loaded Hydraulic Type |
| Chassis | Under Bone | Under Bone |
| Suspension-Rear | 3-Step Adjustable Spring Loaded Hydraulic | Spring Loaded Hydraulic Type |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-90/100-12, Rear :-90/100-10 | Front :-90/100-10, Rear :-90/100-10 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-304.8 mm,Rear :-254 mm | Front :-254 mm, Rear :-254 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | ||
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Sheet Metal | Alloy |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 22 psi | 22 psi |
Dimensions
| Length*Width*Height | 1833*697*1156 | 1781*710*1133 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1260 mm | 1238 mm |
| Length | 1833 mm | 1781 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 171 mm | 158 mm |
| Height | 1156 mm | 1133 mm |
| Seat Height | ... | 765 mm |
| Width | 697 mm | 710 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 5.3 L | 5.3 L |
| Tail Light | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 130 mm | 130 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 130 mm | 130 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | ... | Maintenance Free |
| Seat Opening Switch | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | LED | LED |
Features
| ABS | no | no |
| Body Graphics | ... | |
| Starting | Kick and Self Start | Kick and Self Start |
| Seat Type | Single | Single |
| Pass Switch | ||
| Speedometer | Analogue | Digital |
| Tachometer | Analogue | ... |
| Trip Meter | Analogue | Digital |
| Charging point | ... | |
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | ||
| External Fuel Filling | ... | |
| Clock | ... | |
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Carry hook | ||
| Underseat storage | ... | 18 L |
| Cooling System | Air Cooled | Air Cooled |
| Console | Analogue | Digital |
| Shutter Lock | ... | |
| Odometer | Analogue | Digital |
| Service Due Indicator | ... | |
| DRLs | ... |
Warranty
| Standard Warranty (Years) | ... | 2 |
| Standard Warranty (kilometers) | ... | 24000 |
Also Read Comparison Reviews of :
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. What is the difference between dio, std and dlx? why rates are different?
- Well, way back in 2014-15 I was happy to buy the standard but I think the stylish decor and I do not know about the difference, now. The new Duo has a morning glare Light set on the handle bar which the earlier Doo did not have!
- The above listed have a difference in pricing because the Dio DLX has some extra features which are not available in the Dio STD version.For ex-Dio DLX gets an All digital display while the Dio STD has rhe traditional Analog meter
- Hey Kukil, the DIO - is the older 2017 Dio which will only be around till stocks are available. The STD and DLX are the 2018 Dio - both these get the combi switch and remote boot opener, LED headlamps and DRLs, and combined Braking. What the DLX gets above this is a digital instrument cluster and gold painted wheels. Hope that helps! Ciao!
Q. Hey which is the best scooter Honda dio & yamaha ray zr?
- Both the scooters have similar figures of power, fuel economy and price. Although, there are few differences which are mentioned below: - Yamaha has taken the competition a step ahead with the provision of optional disc brake at the front, which is not available in Honda Dio. - Honda still continues to use the aging trailing link with spring-loaded hydraulic damper type at the front whereas, the Ray-ZR uses oil filled telescopic forks which are far more superior in terms of handling and stability. - The Honda Dio has the smallest wheelbase at 1,781mm which aids to its manoeuvrability. - The ground clearance is the least for the Yamaha Ray-ZR at 128mm while the Dio have clearance of 158mm. - The Honda Dio is equipped with Combi-Brakes which is a boon for amateur riders and misses out in Ray ZR. The Dio features a moto-scooter design and has low seats height which is ideal for youngsters and college-goers. It has been around for a while but the added dash of modernity has given it some much needed freshness. On the other hand, a youthful design and well-engineered mechanicals, the Yamaha Ray-ZR constitutes a fairly attractive package for college-going boys. It could also make for a safer and much cheaper alternative for young men who opt against buying motorcycles. In truth, the scooter could also attract the fairer sex with convenient handling mannerisms, thus supporting its cry for also being a family scooter. Click on the given link to compare both the scooters: https://bit.ly/2NYhJWI Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride in order t judge your comfort and performance. Click on the given link to get your nearest desalership details: https://bit.ly/2jv2aXQ
- I prefer Ray ZR bcz it have many plus like disk break, allow wheels, and telescopic fork and smooth rear dual suspension like bikes and very torque advanced engine than dio and it performs well at higher rpm also it's top speed is higher than dio i used drag race with my frnds dio that time i realise this, in pickup dio is like zap it really quicker than ZR, the pickup is the only disadvantage in ZR but after 60kmph ZR takes lead and yeah ZR wins. Also ZR is very comfortable scooter like mature scooters like activa, maestro. It have Large seat it's very comfortable for long rides even with pillion no trouble. But In dio you will get back pain in long rides even in solo that i experienced in my frnd dio also the pillion is very short and hard like rock it's not comfortable as much like ZR it's smooth like butter when compared with dio. And the mileage is my ZR gives 40kmpl. And it's handling is too good and with disk break it gives you more confidence level while riding but dio didn't give that. Dio is just a teenage squids scooter only for city rides. ZR is very matured one for long life. Or you need all this one like squid performance and also comfy and with better top speed and safety with technology then go with TVS Ntorq 125 trust me dude it's all rounder but i don't know about it's engine life. That's it I shared all my experience. Now decision is yours đź‘Ť
- I will vote for the Honda Dio. I have completed 83 K Kms. yesterday. I started the scooter after 04 months and it started within 03 kicks without any problem. All the spares are readily available. Performance wise Dio shd be better as comp to the Yamaha Ray.I suggest you drive both the vehicles to get a feel of the vehicle engg. If given a choice, I will purchase Dio anytime since the scooter specs are similar but performance wise, Honda Dio rocks & is more reliable.For info., I plan to take my Honda Dio on a 1500 kms.tour in May, so you will understand now....
Q. Hi,Dio vs access 125 which is best - Dio?
- According to style dio is some more stylish than access 125. But it came to performance access 125 is better than dio due to its powerfull 125 cc engine where dio owns only 110 cc engine but new generation dio owns an led drl lamp in its head light
- Although access has more cc, my personal favourite is Honda Dio. In between two Honda Dio gives better pick up and grip.
- If you want looks you can go for the Dio but if you want comfort and better mileage you can opt for the Suzuki Access
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
