Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
Last Updated: November 6, 2026
Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 price starts at Rs. 1.66 Lakh, which is Rs. 24,844 cheaper than the base variant of Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z, priced at Rs. 1.91 Lakh. On the performance front, the Pulsar NS400Z uses a 349.13cc engine producing 40 PS @ 9000 rpm and the MT 15 Version 2.0 a 155cc engine producing 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm. If you're deciding between the Pulsar NS400Z and MT 15 Version 2.0, the MT 15 Version 2.0 is the better pick for affordability and a lighter kerb weight, while the Pulsar NS400Z stands out for performance.
...Read More
Pulsar NS400Z vs MT 15 Version 2.0 Comparison Summary
| Specification | Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z | Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Ex-showroom price (base) | Rs. 1.91 Lakh | Rs. 1.66 Lakh |
| Mileage | Not Available | 56.87 kmpl |
| Engine | 349.13 cc | 155 cc |
| Max power | 40 PS @ 9000 rpm | 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm |
| Kerb weight | 176 Kg | 141 Kg |
-
Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z
Rs. 1.91 Lakh EMI - Rs. 5,716 Get Diwali OffersYamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
Rs. 1.66 Lakh EMI - Rs. 4,794 View November Offers
Pulsar NS400Z vs MT 15 Version 2.0 Key Highlights
| Basic Info | Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z STD | Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 Metallic Black |
|---|---|---|
| Rating |
2 reviews
|
1697 reviews
|
| Brand Name | Bajaj | Yamaha |
| Ex-Showroom Price | Rs. 1.91 Lakh Check On Road Price | Rs. 1.66 Lakh Check On Road Price |
| Engine Type | Liquid Cooled, 4V, DOHC With Four Stroke Single Cylinder | Liquid Cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve |
| Max Power | 40 PS @ 9000 rpm | 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Colors | ||
| Braking Type | Anti-lock Braking System | Not Available |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm Rear :-431.8 mm inch |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| ABS | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| EMI |
Rs. 5,716
@
11.99% (36 months)
|
Rs. 4,794
@
9.45% (36 months)
|
| Insurance | Rs. 11,906 Pulsar NS400Z Insurance | Rs. 11,488 MT 15 Version 2.0 Insurance |
| Brochure |
Download
Brochure
|
Download
Brochure
|
Engine |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brakes |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Suspension |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tyres |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dimensions |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electricals |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Features |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service Cost |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warranty |
|
Pros and Cons
- Positives
- Negatives
- Is priced quite well
- Makes a decent amount of power
- A refined engine
- Sporty handling, and nimble
- Looks aggressive
- Build quality could’ve been better
- Stiff rear suspension
- Lacks bottom end grunt
- Stiff suspension
- Pillion seat is not comfortable
Is Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 Better Than Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z?
50% users have chosen Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 over Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 2853 users have also rated Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 and Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
On the basis of mileage, performance, comfort, maintenance and safety user have rated both the bikes equally.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..
| Ratings Factor | MT 15 Version 2.0 | Pulsar NS400Z |
|---|---|---|
| Mileage | 4.6 | 3.0 |
| Performance | 4.7 | 5.0 |
| Comfort | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Maintenance | 4.3 | 3.0 |
| Safety | 0.1 | 3.0 |
Videos of Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z and Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z Comparison with Similar Bikes
Latest News on Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z and Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
Recently Asked User Questions
- Yes
- MT 15 V2 bike
- Both the bikes are good in their forte. The updates as expected have made the new MT-15 a better bike. It looks more premium, handles better and the addition of a few new features is welcome. But we were expecting more from Yamaha! The dullness of the engine is disappointing and the lack of dual-channel ABS is just beyond any reasoning with this performance on tap. As for goodies such as a quick-shifter and traction control, they should have been offered as part of a premium variant. On the other hand, the Yamaha R15S remains one potent small-capacity supersport for beginners. In its version 3.0 guise, it has become sharper and more focused, making it great for sport riding or trac enthusiasts. However, the aggressive riding stance could cause discomfort if you intend to use the bike for daily commuting and the quality of components have also gone down. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride for a better understanding of performance and comfort. Click on the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
- Both the bikes are good in their forte. The design update has given the KTM 200 Duke a new lease of life. Also, the fact that the new BS6-compliant motor does not lose out on performance almost makes it feel like a win-win. That said, the substantial hike in price means it is now more expensive than larger motorcycles such as the Suzuki Gixxer 250. However, when it comes to thrills, the KTM 200 Duke delivers it in spades! On the other hand, The updates as expected have made the new MT-15 a better bike. It looks more premium, handles better and the addition of a few new features is welcome. But we were expecting more from Yamaha! The dullness of the engine is disappointing and the lack of dual-channel ABS is just beyond any reasoning with this performance on tap. As for goodies such as a quick-shifter and traction control, they should have been offered as part of a premium variant. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.Read more -Yamaha MT-15 Version 2.0 Road Test Review - The Perfect Imperfection.
Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z Vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 FAQs
Images of Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z and Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
- Home ›
- New Bikes ›
- Compare Bikes ›
- Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0









