Bajaj Pulsar N250 vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0

Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 Price starts at Rs. 1.58 Lakh which is Rs. 24,034 costlier than base model of Bajaj Pulsar N250 priced at Rs. 1.34 Lakh. The claimed mileage of Bajaj Pulsar N250 is 39 kmpl whereas the mileage of Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 is 47.94 kmpl. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar N250 is powered by 249.07 cc engine , while Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 is powered by 155 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar N250 is available in 3 different colours while Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 comes with 5 colours. The Comparison Bajaj Pulsar N250 vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Pulsar N250 vs MT 15 Version 2.0

Key Highlights Pulsar N250 STDMT 15 Version 2.0 Metallic Black
Engine Type 4 stroke, SOHC, 2 valve, Oil cooled, FI Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve
Max Power 24.5 PS @ 8750 rpm 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm

Pulsar N250 vs MT 15 Version 2.0 Key Highlights

Basic Info Bajaj Pulsar N250 STDYamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 Metallic Black
Rating
182 reviews
1631 reviews
Brand Name Bajaj Yamaha
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.34 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 1.58 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type 4 stroke, SOHC, 2 valve, Oil cooled, FI Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve
Max Power 24.5 PS @ 8750 rpm 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Bajaj Pulsar N250 Colors
Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm Rear :-431.8 mm inch
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
EMI
Rs. 4,010 @ 11.99% (36 months)
Rs. 4,558 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 10,946 Pulsar N250 Insurance Rs. 11,350 MT 15 Version 2.0 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Engine Type
4 stroke, SOHC, 2 valve, Oil cooled, FI
Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve
Engine Displacement
249.07 cc
155 cc
Max Power
24.5 PS @ 8750 rpm
18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm
Max Torque
21.5 Nm @ 6500 rpm
14.1 Nm @ 7500 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Bore
72 mm
58.0 mm
Stroke
61.17 mm
58.7 mm
No Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
2
4
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Compression Ratio
10.3
11.6 :1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Disc
Disc

Braking (60-0 kmph)
...
19.79m
Braking (80-0 kmph)
...
35.05m
Braking (100-0 kmph)
...
58.20m
Mileage (City)
...
56.87 kmpl
Mileage (Highway)
...
47.94 kmpl
Mileage (Overall)
39 kmpl
56.87 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
...
14.28s
Top Speed
132 kmph
122 kmph

Tyre Size
Front :-: 110/70-17, Rear :-140/70-17
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/70R-17
Peak Power
24.5 PS @ 8750 rpm
18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm Rear :-431.8 mm inch
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
25 psi
32 psi

Seat height
800 mm
810 mm
Length*Width*Height
...
2015*800*1070 mm3
Wheelbase
1342 mm
1325 mm
Length
...
2015 mm
Ground Clearance
165 mm
170 mm
Height
...
1070 mm
Width
...
800 mm
Fuel Capacity
14 Liters
10 Liters
Kerb Weight
164 Kg
141 Kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Saddle Height
800 mm
810 mm
Front Brake Diameter
300 mm
282 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
230 mm
220 mm

Additional Features
...
Variable Valve Actuation (VVA)
Call/SMS Alerts
...
USB charging port
...
Headlight
LED
LED
Battery Capacity
12V / 8AH
12V / 4AH
Pilot Lamps
...
Turn Signal Lamp
LED
LED

Frame
Tubular Frame
Deltabox
ABS
Dual Channel
Dual Channel
Body Type
Sports Bikes
Sports Naked Bikes, Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
Instrument Console
Digital
Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
Bluetooth
...
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Split
Pass Switch
Display
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Mobile Application
...
Tripmeter
Digital
Digital
Average Fuel economy
...
Distance to Empty Indicator
...
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Techometer
Digital
Digital
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
...
Low Oil Indicator
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights
Cooling System
Oil Cooled
Liquid Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
...
Service Due Indicator
...
Switchable ABS
...
DRLs

Standard Warranty (Years)
5
2
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
75000
30000

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Bajaj Pulsar N250
  • Excellent engine performance with lots of grunt
  • Comfortable ride quality
  • 795mm seat height makes the bike accessible for shorter riders
Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
  • A refined engine
  • Sporty handling, and nimble
  • Looks aggressive
Bajaj Pulsar N250
  • Lacks features like smartphone connectivity, which are common in the segment these days
  • Could’ve gotten better build quality
Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
  • Lacks bottom end grunt
  • Stiff suspension
  • Pillion seat is not comfortable

Is Bajaj Pulsar N250 Better Than Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0?

100% users have chosen Bajaj Pulsar N250 over Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 3054 users have also rated Bajaj Pulsar N250 and Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Bajaj Pulsar N250 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for performance, comfort, maintenance and features in your bike. But Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 is better on the grounds of mileage.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor MT 15 Version 2.0 Pulsar N250
Mileage 4.3 4.6
Performance 4.8 4.7
Comfort 4.6 4.5
Maintenance 4.5 4.3
Features 4.8 4.7
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Review and Win Banner

Bajaj Pulsar N250 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Bajaj Pulsar N250 and Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Hunter 350 or n 250 is good for 6 ft person?
  • Both the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Bajaj Pulsar N250 offer seat heights that can accommodate taller riders. The Hunter 350 features a seat height of 800mm, while the Pulsar N250 has a slightly taller seat height of 795mm. Both motorcycles provide comfortable ergonomics suitable for riders around 6 feet tall but it's advisable to test ride each to determine which aligns best with your comfort and riding preferences.https://www.zigwheels.com/bike-comparison/bajaj-pulsar-n250-vs-royal-enfield-hunter
Q. What should I buy between Yamaha MT 15 V2 and R15S?
  • Yes
  • MT 15 V2 bike
  • Both the bikes are good in their forte. The updates as expected have made the new MT-15 a better bike. It looks more premium, handles better and the addition of a few new features is welcome. But we were expecting more from Yamaha! The dullness of the engine is disappointing and the lack of dual-channel ABS is just beyond any reasoning with this performance on tap. As for goodies such as a quick-shifter and traction control, they should have been offered as part of a premium variant. On the other hand, the Yamaha R15S remains one potent small-capacity supersport for beginners. In its version 3.0 guise, it has become sharper and more focused, making it great for sport riding or trac enthusiasts. However, the aggressive riding stance could cause discomfort if you intend to use the bike for daily commuting and the quality of components have also gone down. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride for a better understanding of performance and comfort. Click on the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
Q. Which bike is the best between, Yamaha MT-15 Version 2.0 or KTM 200 Duke?
  • Both the bikes are good in their forte. The design update has given the KTM 200 Duke a new lease of life. Also, the fact that the new BS6-compliant motor does not lose out on performance almost makes it feel like a win-win. That said, the substantial hike in price means it is now more expensive than larger motorcycles such as the Suzuki Gixxer 250. However, when it comes to thrills, the KTM 200 Duke delivers it in spades! On the other hand, The updates as expected have made the new MT-15 a better bike. It looks more premium, handles better and the addition of a few new features is welcome. But we were expecting more from Yamaha! The dullness of the engine is disappointing and the lack of dual-channel ABS is just beyond any reasoning with this performance on tap. As for goodies such as a quick-shifter and traction control, they should have been offered as part of a premium variant. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.Read more -Yamaha MT-15 Version 2.0 Road Test Review - The Perfect Imperfection.
|Bajaj Pulsar N250 Community

Bajaj Pulsar N250 Vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 FAQs

Which bike is best between Bajaj Pulsar N250 vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0?
As per the users experiences Bajaj Pulsar N250 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for performance, comfort, maintenance and features in your bike. But Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 is better on the grounds of mileage.
Which bike is cheaper Bajaj Pulsar N250 vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0?
The Bajaj Pulsar N250 is cheaper than Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 by Rs. 24,034.
Which bike offers better performance Bajaj Pulsar N250 vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0?
For the STD version, 249.07 cc Petrol engine of Pulsar N250 produces 24.5 PS @ 8750 rpm of power and 21.5 Nm @ 6500 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Metallic Black version, 155 cc Petrol engine of MT 15 Version 2.0 produces 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm of power and 14.1 Nm @ 7500 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Bajaj Pulsar N250 has better performance.

Images of Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 and Bajaj Pulsar N250

Which one do you like more?
MT 15 Version 2.0
MT 15 Version 2.0
Pulsar N250
Pulsar N250
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Bajaj Pulsar N250 vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
×