×

Suzuki Intruder vs Yamaha FZ 25 Comparison

Suzuki Intruder vs Yamaha FZ 25

Suzuki Intruder Price starts at Rs. 1.01 lakh which is Rs. 1.01 lakh costlier than Yamaha FZ 25 priced at Rs. To Be Announced. The claimed mileage for the Suzuki Intruder is 47.6 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for Yamaha FZ 25 is NA. In technical specifications, Suzuki Intruder is powered by 154.9 cc engine where as Yamaha FZ 25 is powered by 249 cc engine. Suzuki Intruder is available in 1 different colours while Yamaha FZ 25 comes with 1 colours. 66% users have chosen Yamaha FZ 25 over Suzuki Intruder in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Suzuki Intruder vs Yamaha FZ 25 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.

Intruder vs FZ 25 Specs Overview

Specs/Features Intruder FiFZ 25 Moto GP Limited Edition
Price Rs. 1.08 lakh Rs. 1.37 lakh
Engine Type 4-stroke, 1-cylinder, Air-cooled Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, SOHC
Engine Displacement (CC) 154.9 cc 249 cc
Power (PS@rpm) 14.8 PS @ 8000 rpm 20.9 PS @ 8000 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
0-60 kmph (sec) 5.53s 3.77s
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Cast Alloy
ABS Single Channel Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
Engine Type 4-stroke, 1-cylinder, Air-cooled Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, SOHC
Engine Displacement (CC) 154.9 cc 249 cc
Power (PS@rpm) 14.8 PS @ 8000 rpm 20.9 PS @ 8000 rpm
Torque (Nm@rpm) 14 Nm @ 6000 rpm 20 Nm @ 6000 rpm
Emission Type bs4 bs4
Bore 56 mm 74 mm
Stroke 62.9 mm 58 mm
No Of Cylinders 1 1
Drive Type Chain Drive Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder 2 2
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Compression Ratio ... 9.8:1
Transmission Type Manual Manual
No Of Gears 5 Speed 5-speed
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
0-60 kmph (sec) 5.53s 3.77s
Quarter Mile 20.01 s @ 102.55 kmph 17.32s@117.22 kmph
Braking (60-0 kmph) ... 2.89s, 15.85mm
Braking (80-0 kmph) ... 3.61s, 30.02mm
Mileage (City) 50 kmpl 45.6 kmpl
Mileage (Highway) 57.8 kmpl 31.17 kmpl
Mileage (Overall) 52 kmpl 35 kmpl
0-100 kmph (sec) 18.42s 10.33s
Braking 60-0 km/h ... 2.89s, 15.85mm
Suspension-Front Telescopic Telescopic Fork
Chassis ... Daimond
Suspension-Rear Swing Arm Type Swingarm (Monocross)
Tyre Size Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/60-17 Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-140/70-17
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type Tubeless Tubeless
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Cast Alloy
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) ... 25 psi
Length*Width*Height 2130*805*1095 2015*770*1075
Wheelbase(mm) 1405 mm 1360 mm
Length 2130 mm 2015 mm
Ground Clearance (mm) 170 mm 160 mm
Height 1095 mm 1075 mm
Seat Height 740 mm 795 mm
Width 805 mm 770 mm
Fuel Capacity (Litres) 11 L 14 L
Tail Light LED LED
Front Brake Diameter ... 282 mm
Rear Brake Diameter ... 220 mm
Battery Type Maintenance Free ...
LED tail lights
Turn Signal Lamp Bulb Bulb
ABS Single Channel Dual Channel
Body Type Cruiser Bikes Sports Naked Bikes
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Seat Type Split Split
Pass Switch
Speedometer Digital Digital
Trip Meter Digital Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp ...
Clock Digital
Stepup Seat
Low Oil Indicator ...
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights ...
Passenger Backrest ...
Cooling System Air Cooled Air Cooled
Console Digital Digital
Odometer Digital Digital
Mobile Connectivity ...

Similar Bike Comparisons

Compare Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Is this bike worth to buy? Please help me to know any pros. and cons. about this bike or any other bike in this segment. - FZ 25?
  • Bro. I've owned this bike for around 2 years now. The bike is great and everything. Its good a good and peppy engine. Great milage considering the power it has. Extremely comfortable seats. The main downside i came across was the weak headlight unit. You could very well get an aftermarket LED fitted on it or go for fog lamps. 6th gear is a problem only when the bike is pushed hard. In normal city driving and highway runs you won't need a 6th gear. The service and maintenance cost of the bike is very less as with all Yamaha bikes. Also it is ultra reliable and won't need too many services
  • Hello. The 2019 model gets dual channel Abs.
  • Pros- Good pickup, Nice accelerating, Good for both city and highway driving. mileage in best with 250 cc segment and it's almost low budget bike in 250 cc also. service center available everywhere cons- Air cooled Bike, little problem in engine hitting specially on long drive and on summer season. Old and 1st model don't have ABS that's a badluck. silencer got rusted with more heat power from engine and even after repeated paint by the showroom still its again looks like iron parts. but still overall it's amazing bike
View All Answers
Q. Pulsar NS 200 or Yamaha FZ 25, which one is better?
  • Both have their pros and cons. I faced the same confusion. I booked ns 200 then canceled it and bought Fz25. The main reason was the look. When you sit on it, it feels very premium. And also because it is made by yamaha. No one can beat yamaha in terms of engine refinement and durability of a bike. Speaking of NS 200, it has a liquid cooled engine and abs option as well. Which FZ25 Misses out. So i suggest have a test drive and then decide.I personally choose FZ25 and have really enjoyed the experience & the power of this bike.
  • FZ25 Buddy... Anytimeit is more practical, better torque, better fuel efficiency, better handling, better built quality, more reliable, less vibration, more refined enginewhat else do you needtop speed - 135fuel economy - 38-44
  • If you need better build quality the. go for fz25. if you need normal build quality the. go for ns200 but ns200 is best bike owner of a fz25 saying ns200 is best close your eyes and go for it
View All Answers
Q. Which bike is better, Apache RTR 200 4V or FZ 25?
  • The TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is a comfortable city bike with plenty of grunt and agility for a quick race off the traffic lights and to tackle some twisties as well. But the engine feels too strained out on the highway. Also, ergonomically, with the high-set footpegs, it’s a tight spot for someone taller than 5 feet 10 inches. Even the brakes fail to inspire confidence under hard braking. Luckily though, TVS does offer ABS as an option. While, the Yamaha FZ25 is a good option for someone looking for a daily commuter. It’s a lot more welcoming for tall riders as well, when compared to the TVS Apache RTR 200 4V. Being a Yamaha, the FZ25 will prove to be reliable in the long run, looks smart and is a lot more frugal in the city. But the engine feels stressed at high speeds. Moreover, both the brakes and tyres don’t inspire confidence under hard braking either. If your daily riding consists more of city commutes, the Yamaha FZ25 or the TVS Apache RTR 200 4V both are good to go. But if you are looking to ride your bike out on the highway as well, the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is a more potent tool to opt for.We would suggest you to take a test ride in order to clear your all doubts. Click on the given link to get your nearest dealership details: https://www.zigwheels.com/bikes/dealers
  • Well both the bikes have come from a promising brand, so differentiating them on the build quality won't be wise. The only thing i can say is that the fz25 is much more comfortable than the apache in the city as well as on the highway. And as we go onto the specs the fz offers a better torque and a lot better pickup and braking as compared to the apache. So i would recommend the fz25 over the apache 200 4v
  • Both bikes performance is quiet equal on paper. TVS Apache 4v is quiet cheaper in terms of money and thats because the built quality is quiet cheap. While FZ 25 built quality quiet better.
View All Answers
View More Questions