Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 vs Yamaha R15 V3 Comparison
-
Gixxer SF 250
Rs. 1.71 lakhEMI - Rs. 4,939Get Loan starting @9.7%
YZF R15 V3
Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 vs Yamaha R15 V3
Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 Price starts at Rs. 1.71 lakh which is Rs. 29,775 costlier than Yamaha YZF R15 V3 priced at Rs. 1.41 lakh. The claimed mileage for the Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 is 38.5 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for Yamaha YZF R15 V3 is 48.8 kmpl. In technical specifications, Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 is powered by 249 cc engine where as Yamaha YZF R15 V3 is powered by 155 cc engine. Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 is available in 1 different colours while Yamaha YZF R15 V3 comes with 1 colours. 54% users have chosen Yamaha YZF R15 V3 over Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 vs Yamaha YZF R15 V3 on the basis of price, specifications & other features....read more
Gixxer SF 250 vs YZF R15 V3 vs RC 200 Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | Gixxer SF 250 MotoGP Edition | YZF R15 V3 BS6 | RC 200 BS6 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ex-Showroom Price | Rs. 1.71 lakhView On Road Price | Rs. 1.45 lakhView On Road Price | Rs. 1.97 lakhView On Road Price |
| Rating | 4.5 (51 Ratings) |
4.3 (1190 Ratings) |
4.2 (506 Ratings) |
| Engine Type | 4-Stroke, 1-Cylinder, Oil-cooled | Liquid cooled, 4-Stroke, 4-Valve, SOHC Engine | Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 249 cc | 155 cc | 199.5 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 26.5 PS @ 9000 rpm | 18.6 PS @ 10000 rpm | 25 PS @ 10000 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual | Manual |
| Colors | |||
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc | Disc |
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 3.66s | ... | ... |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 38.5 kmpl | ... | ... |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy | Alloy |
| ABS | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital | Digital |
Engine
| Engine Type | 4-Stroke, 1-Cylinder, Oil-cooled | Liquid cooled, 4-Stroke, 4-Valve, SOHC Engine | Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 249 cc | 155 cc | 199.5 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 26.5 PS @ 9000 rpm | 18.6 PS @ 10000 rpm | 25 PS @ 10000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 22.6 Nm @ 7500 rpm | 14.1 Nm @ 8500 rpm | 19.2 Nm @ 8000 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs4 | bs6 | bs6 |
| Bore | 76 mm | 58 mm | 72 mm |
| Stroke | 54.9 mm | 58.7 mm | 49 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | ... | TCI (Transistor controlled ignition) | Contactless, Controlled, Fully Electronic Ignition System With Digital Ignition Timing Adjustment |
| Compression Ratio | ... | 11.6:1 | 14.5:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 6 Speed | 6-Speed | 6 Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc | Disc |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 3.66s | ... | ... |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | 21.64m | ... | ... |
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | 38.16m | ... | ... |
| Braking (100-0 kmph) | 66.26m | ... | ... |
| Mileage (City) | 37.5 kmpl | ... | ... |
| Mileage (Highway) | 40.95 kmpl | ... | ... |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 38.5 kmpl | ... | ... |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | 9.57s | ... | ... |
| Braking 60-0 km/h | 21.64m | ... | ... |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic, Coil Spring, Oil Damped | Telescopic Fork | WP-USD Ø 43 mm |
| Chassis | ... | Delta Box | Steel Trellis Frame |
| Suspension-Rear | Swingarm Type, Mono Suspension | Monocross (link suspension) | WP Monoshock |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-110/70-17, Rear :-150/60-17 | Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/70-17 | Front :-110/70 - 17, Rear :-150/60 - 17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | |||
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy | Alloy |
Dimensions
| Dry Weight | ... | ... | 154.3 kg |
| Length*Width*Height | 2010*740*1035 | 1990*725*1135 | 1978*688*1098 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1345 mm | 1325 mm | 1340 mm |
| Length | 2010 mm | 1990 mm | 1978 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 165 mm | 170 mm | 178.5 mm |
| Height | 1035 mm | 1135 mm | 1098 mm |
| Seat Height | 800 mm | 815 mm | 835 mm |
| Width | 740 mm | 725 mm | 688 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 12 L | 11 L | 9.5 L |
| Tail Light | LED | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 300 mm | 282 mm | 300 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | ... | 220 mm | 230 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | Maintenance Free | ETZ | ... |
| LED tail lights | ... | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | LED | Bulb | LED |
Features
| ABS | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Bikes | Sports Bikes | Sports Bikes |
| Body Graphics | |||
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Split | Split | Split |
| Pass Switch | |||
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital | Digital |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital | Digital |
| Average Fuel economy | ... | ... | |
| Distance to Empty | ... | ... | |
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | ... | ||
| Clock | ... | ||
| Low Battery Indicator | ... | ... | |
| Stepup Seat | ... | ... | |
| Low Oil Indicator | ... | ||
| Passenger Footrest | |||
| Projector Headlights | ... | ... | |
| Underseat storage | ... | ... | |
| Cooling System | Oil Cooled | Liquid Cooled | Liquid Cooled |
| Console | Digital | Digital | Digital |
| Odometer | Digital | Digital | Digital |
Watch Videos of Gixxer SF 250 and YZF R15 V3
News Updates on Gixxer SF 250 and YZF R15 V3
-
Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 Review: Photo Gallery
How does Suzuki’s new quarter-litre sport bike fare in the real world? We find out
Aug 27, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels -
How Different Is The BS6 Yamaha R15 V3 From The BS4 Iteration?
While the BS6 Yamaha R15 maybe a bit down on power, it gets a couple of new features over its predecessor
Dec 9, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels -
Suzuki Gives The MotoGP Treatment To The Gixxer SF 250
The colour update does not cost a bomb over the standard colours
Aug 7, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels -
BS6-compliant Yamaha R15 V3.0 And Fascino Coming Next Month
The BS6 R15, as well as the Fascino, might get a drop in power
Nov 12, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which one is better between R15 V3 and RS200?
- We rode the new R15 v3.0 on both the racetrack and in the real world. While the R15 has grown larger and more powerful, it needs a certain level of expertise to tame. The more committed ergonomics make for an uncomfortable ride in the city. If you are looking for a dynamically competent bike that you’d like to hone your riding skills on and don't mind the committed riding position, the Yamaha R15 v 3.0 is the one to go for. It's a bike we'd love to have in our garage but its ergonomics limit its practicality. On the other hand, the Bajaj Pulsar RS200 certainly scores a few brownie points when it comes to engine refinement and performance. It is also well loaded with nifty features such as projector headlamps with LED DRLs, a backlit semi-digital instrument console and ABS. All in all, those looking for an affordable, fully-faired bike with sporty characteristics, the RS200 is certainly an attractive buy. Read More: - Yamaha R15 v3.0 Road Test Review: https://www.zigwheels.com/reviews-advice/reviews/yamaha-r15-v30-road-test-review/30566 - 2017 Bajaj Pulsar RS 200: First Ride Review: https://www.zigwheels.com/reviews-advice/reviews/2017-bajaj-pulsar-rs-200-first-ride-review/27398
- Now r15 v3 it has the race DNA and track ergonomics.Yamaha this time didnt compromise performance for looks as in a v2.Its the best in 150 cc segment..Rc 200 is a track oriented race machine if you are a beginner go for r15.rv is a great choice which can be compared to Apache rtr or cbr 350 or rr 310 from the.
- If you want more aggressive riding posture and you are corner enthusiastic then you should go for r15 v3 and you can also do weekend rides on it if you want want to go for long rides without taking many stops then rs200 is a good option
Q. Suggest me a bike under 1.5 lakh I am 6 feet and I am collage boy.
- Bro close your eyes and go for R15 V3 Best performance with best mileage and low maintenance...and even it's looks are also amazing
- Always rs 200...u can compare ..RS 200 with other bikes...it have higher top speed..greater acceleration with dynamic looks
- Bro you can buy an duke 200 with the money than can be used to buy an rc 125
Q. Can I use R15 V3. 0 for long rides, 500 kms around without discomfort? If not which bike in this price range is better?
View More Questions
- Yes u can go 500 kms around without discomfort by staying 30 minutes for every 100 to 120 Km On average i have a great experience go 1000 Km, height is below 5'9 - 5.5 its preferably otherwise it will be uncomfortable for long ride.
- It will be a little bit stiff ride while going that far on a sports bike like Yamaha YZF R15 V3 which have such an aggressive seating position. We will recommend you to go for bikes which have a more comfortable riding position we can give you some awesome options such as Bajaj Pulsar NS200, KTM 200 Duke, and Bajaj Dominar 400.
- It's a good for 500 KiloMiter. But it's definitely not comtable but it's good choice for speed and performance and cornering
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
