Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 vs Yamaha R15 V4
Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 vs Yamaha R15 V4 Summary
Basic Info | Gixxer SF 250 BS6 | R15 V4 Metallic Red |
---|---|---|
Brand Name | Suzuki | Yamaha |
Ex-Showroom Price | Rs. 1.90 Lakh View On Road Price | Rs. 1.77 Lakh View On Road Price |
Rating | 4.5 (144 Ratings) |
4.4 (271 Ratings) |
Engine Type | 4-Stroke, 1-cylinder, Oil cooled | Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve |
Max Power | 26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm | 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm |
Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
Colors | ||
Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
ABS | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
Insurance | Rs. 13,366 Gixxer SF 250 Insurance | Rs. 11,673 R15 V4 Insurance |
Engine |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brakes |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Suspension |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tyres |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dimensions |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electricals |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Features |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warranty |
|
Pros and Cons
- Positives
- Negatives
Suzuki Gixxer SF 250
- Free revving and torquey motor
- Riding posture is sporty but not aggressive
- Competent riding setup
Suzuki Gixxer SF 250
- ABS calibration could have been better
- Windshield seems inadequate for wind deflection
- Touring capabilities could be restricted due to small tank
Is Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 Better Than Yamaha R15 V4?
57% users have chosen Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 over Yamaha R15 V4 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 669 users have also rated Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 and Yamaha R15 V4 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for performance, comfort and maintenance in your bike. But Yamaha R15 V4 is better on the grounds of mileage. On the basis of features user have rated both the bikes equally.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..
Ratings Factor | R15 V4 | Gixxer SF 250 |
---|---|---|
Mileage | 4.1 | 4.4 |
Performance | 4.7 | 4.5 |
Comfort | 4.7 | 4.3 |
Maintenance | 4.3 | 4.1 |
Features | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Gixxer SF 250 and R15 V4 Competitors
-
Royal Enfield Classic 350
Rs. 1.90 Lakh -
TVS Apache RR 310
Rs. 2.65 Lakh -
KTM 250 Duke
Rs. 2.35 Lakh -
Suzuki Gixxer SF
Rs. 1.35 Lakh -
Yamaha YZF R15 V3
Rs. 1.57 Lakh
News Updates on Gixxer SF 250 and R15 V4
-
The Suzuki GSX250R Bleeds Blue…Again9 Mar, 2022 | By Team ZigWheels
-
The Evolution Of The Indian Biking Segment In The Last 10 Years20 Jun, 2022 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 Gets Exotic MotoGP Livery1 Oct, 2020 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Planning To Buy The Yamaha R15? Here’s How Long You’ll Have To Wait2 Jun, 2022 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 Review: Photo Gallery27 Aug, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Yamaha R15M MotoGP Special Edition Is No Longer On Sale11 May, 2022 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Suzuki Gives The MotoGP Treatment To The Gixxer SF 2507 Aug, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Yamaha Hikes The Prices Of R15 And FZ Range Yet Again9 May, 2022 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Suzuki Gixxer SF 250: In Pictures20 May, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Planning To Buy The R15? Here’s How Long You’ll Have To Wait4 May, 2022 | By Team ZigWheels
Recently Asked User Questions
- A lot of difference , Braking is improved , Power delivery improved . Emission reduced by more than 50% , Economy increased and much refined and smooth engine.
- Only the price. No other difference
- A slightly less torque
- Pulsar ns 200 is definitely superior over others in daily commute.I own a Gixxer 250 it's very difficult in city
- Add 30k to your budget and go for New Dominar..400. You will love it in city and highway drive too
- Gixxer 250 sf is not at all difficult i city, i own one. maybe,little bit, but not too much
- The Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 is powered by a 249cc, single-cylinder, fuel-injected, BS6-compliant engine which makes 26.5PS of power and 22.2Nm (0.4Nm down), mated to a 6-speed gearbox. Though the bike sports a outward appearance of an aggressive sport bike, the riding position is rather neutral. It’s got wide clip-on handlebars that are positioned quite close to the rider, and are reasonably tall. Also, the rider's seat itself is quite comfortable. As for the fuel efficiency, the bike delivers a claimed mileage of 37.5kmpl in the city and 40.95kmpl on highways, while the claimed fuel efficiency of Dominar 250 is 35.03kmpl. On the other hand, the Dominar 250 gets its traits from the elder sibling, the Dominar 400 which have proven to be quite comfortable to ride. We would suggest you to take a test ride of the bikes in order to get a better understanding of comfort and compatibility. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.Read More: - Bajaj Dominar 250 Road Test- Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 Road Test Review- Bajaj Dominar 250 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF 250
- Domi250 is naked tourer With drag handlebar and sf 250 is fully faired sports tourer with clip on handlebar. Domi250 riding position is better upright position than sf250. Sf250 is little agressive but sf250 engine refinement is much better. In city traffic don't worry for too much gear shifting in sf 250 and sf250 gives you better mileage and styling... If you ride for long distance then domi 250 is better.. your money your choice.. thank you bro..good luck for your new bike..
- Totally , Dominar weighs much more than gixxer also the power to weight ratio is so bad you will have to rev the bike to get a good feel thereby reducing city mileage.
Gixxer SF 250 Vs R15 V4 Comparison FAQs
As per the users experiences Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for performance, comfort and maintenance in your bike. But Yamaha R15 V4 is better on the grounds of mileage. On the basis of features user have rated both the bikes equally.
The Yamaha R15 V4 is cheaper than Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 by Rs. 13,000.
For the BS6 version, 249 cc Petrol engine of Gixxer SF 250 produces 26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm of power and 22.2 Nm @ 7300 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Metallic Red version, 155 cc Petrol engine of R15 V4 produces 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm of power and 14.2 Nm @ 7500 rpm of torqueAs per the users experiences the Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 has better performance.
User Reviews of Comparison
- Suzuki Gixxer SF 250
- Yamaha R15 V4
-
At the price point, You get: 1.Japanese brand reliability unlike ktm 2.Full fared with better wind protection unlike duke 250, Fz25, Etc.3.More mileage unlike ktm / husqvarna.4.Better pillion comfort than r15 / rc2005.No vibrations, Unlike bajaj6.More power than r15 / rc200it is worth each and every penny you are paying.
Sushant Patil 4 weeks ago -
Actually my bike is still new though I am receiving a mileage around 30kmpl. Hope it will improve after one or two service. Although I am really interested with this mileage as I am always driving it in low gears in local market areas with lots of clutch and brakes.
Partha Basak few weeks ago -
real competitor...its a 250 cc..low heat from engines..good power and torque...great styling( but look like younger 150cc).. track and touring capacity..but if you pardon Suzuki for the wind shield..
Jo few weeks ago -
One of the best 250cc bike, Riding position is very comfortable but odd for pillon.Can easily touch 100kmph in less than 8 seconds and we can drive with ease.Rear break will work less effectively.
Chandu Goud few weeks ago -
Using SF 250 bs6 for a year and have clocked 8500 km. I ride it every day 50 km to work occasionally take it to the highway. It is an excellent bike in l aspects. Getting mileage of 41+kmpl in the city.
Sai 28166 few weeks ago
-
I am very happy to ride it..It's very aggressive riding position and i like that.I love it's top speed it's awesome.I ride to top 147km/l.I wish that bike support to travel ladakh.Bike brake are very good.New looks are awesome.I wish to ride to ladakh.New colours are really unique i don't know when i'm buying my dream bike but still i'm enjoying in my friends bike thank you yamaha for this great bike💝.
Rohith Kumar 2 weeks ago -
Good 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊 good good 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊 good good 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊 goodgood 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊 goodgood 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊 goodgood 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊 goodgood 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊 goodgood 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊 goodjjnn
Teja Rane few weeks ago -
I just love 💞😘 my darling 💕🥰 while riding this beauty i just feel to ride more & more.The breaking system, Front lights, The way it's made, & the look ohoo just amazing 💓❤️❣️😘😘.Feels the safest ride on it.I'm very happy for this beauty queen 👑❤️🥰❣️😘.
Sayeed Anwar 1 week ago -
Awesome red beast road presence is awesome feels like power in handscornering feels like you are on a trackfeature rich awesome bike.
Ronnie 007 few weeks ago -
Condition should be good and the parts should not be broken and the mileage should be good.And the bike should be well maintained.
Mithilesh 962 few weeks ago
Images of Yamaha R15 V4,Suzuki Gixxer SF 250
Popular Bikes Comparison
- Trending
- Scooters
- Sports
- Cruisers
- Commuters
-
Start a new comparison
-
BajajPulsar NS200Rs. 1.39 LakhvsYamahaMT-15 Version 2.0Rs. 1.62 Lakh
-
Start a new comparison
-
Royal EnfieldClassic 350Rs. 1.90 LakhvsRoyal EnfieldMeteor 350Rs. 2.01 Lakh
-
Royal EnfieldBullet 350Rs. 1.47 LakhvsRoyal EnfieldClassic 350Rs. 1.90 Lakh
-
Start a new comparison
-
Hero Moto CorpSplendor PlusRs. 69,380vsHero Moto CorpHF DeluxeRs. 50,900
-
Start a new comparison