Suzuki Access 125 vs TVS Jupiter Comparison
Suzuki Access 125 vs TVS Jupiter
Suzuki Access 125 Price starts at Rs. 59,014 which is Rs. 4,665 costlier than TVS Jupiter priced at Rs. 54,349. The claimed mileage for the Suzuki Access 125 is 64 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for TVS Jupiter is 62 kmpl. In technical specifications, Suzuki Access 125 is powered by 124 cc engine where as TVS Jupiter is powered by 109.7 cc engine. Suzuki Access 125 is available in 2 different colours while TVS Jupiter comes with 7 colours. 59% users have chosen Suzuki Access 125 over TVS Jupiter in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Suzuki Access 125 vs TVS Jupiter on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Access 125 vs Jupiter Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | Access 125 Special Edition Disc CBS | Jupiter Classic BS6 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Rs. 63,581 | Rs. 67,911 |
| Engine Type | Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 2 Valve, SOHC | Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, OHC, BS-VI |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 124 cc | 109.7 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 8.7 PS @ 7000 rpm | 7.99 PS @ 7500 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Brakes Front | Disc | Drum |
| Brakes Rear | Drum | Drum |
| Braking Type | Combi Brake System | Synchronized Braking System |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 64 kmpl | ... |
| Wheel Size | Front :-304.8 mm,Rear :-254 mm | Front :-304.8 mm,Rear :-304.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| ABS | no | no |
| Starting | Kick and Self Start | Kick and Self Start |
| Speedometer | Analogue | Analogue |
Engine
| Engine Type | Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 2 Valve, SOHC | Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, OHC, BS-VI |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 124 cc | 109.7 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 8.7 PS @ 7000 rpm | 7.99 PS @ 7500 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 10.2 Nm @ 5000 rpm | 8.4 Nm @ 5500 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs4 | bs6 |
| Bore | 52.5 mm | ... |
| Stroke | 57.4 mm | ... |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Belt Drive | Belt Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 2 | ... |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | ... | Digital IDI With Ignition Map Technology |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| No Of Gears | CVT | CVT |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Drum |
| Brakes Rear | Drum | Drum |
| Braking Type | Combi Brake System | Synchronized Braking System |
Performance
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 64 kmpl | ... |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic | Telescopic |
| Chassis | ... | High Rigidity Underbone Type |
| Suspension-Rear | Swing Arm | Gas Charged Mono Shock |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-90/90-12, Rear :-90/100-10 | Front :- 90/90-12, Rear :- 90/90-12 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-304.8 mm,Rear :-254 mm | Front :-304.8 mm,Rear :-304.8 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | ||
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 29 psi | ... |
Dimensions
| Length*Width*Height | 1870*655*1160 | 1834*650*1115 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1265 mm | 1275 mm |
| Length | 1870 mm | 1834 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 160 mm | 150 mm |
| Height | 1160 mm | 1115 mm |
| Seat Height | 773 mm | 765 mm |
| Width | 655 mm | 650 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 5.6 L | ... |
| Tail Light | Bulb | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | ... | 130 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | ... | 130 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | Maintenance Free | ... |
| Pilot Lamps | ... | |
| LED tail lights | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | Bulb | LED |
Features
| ABS | no | no |
| Starting | Kick and Self Start | Kick and Self Start |
| Seat Type | Single | Single |
| Pass Switch | ||
| Speedometer | Analogue | Analogue |
| Trip Meter | Digital | ... |
| Charging point | ||
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | ||
| External Fuel Filling | ... | |
| Clock | ... | |
| Stepup Seat | With Long Seat | ... |
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Passenger Backrest | ... | Cushioned |
| Carry hook | ... | |
| Underseat storage | 21.8 L | |
| Cooling System | Air Cooled | Air Cooled |
| Console | Analogue and Digital | Analogue |
| Odometer | Digital | Analogue |
| Mobile Connectivity | ... | |
| DRLs | ... |
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which is better, Access 125 or TVS Jupiter?
- Both the scooters are good to buy in their segment. TVS Jupiter offers a lot more features and variety (in the form of variants) than the Activa, thus making it a very sound proposition for those who want a reliable, no-nonsense scooter. The frugal engine, comfortable ride quality and the fact that it is cheaper than the Honda Activa despite offering much more make it our pick as the best 110cc scooter on sale. Whereas Suzuki has revamped the Access and by the looks of it it looks quite good. It now comes with SEP technology, alloy wheels, an optional front disc and with ride quality as its main focus. Access is a complete package and should help Suzuki make up lost ground despite the competition is rather stiff in the segment. Do take a test ride in order to pick one.
- Access 125 beats the Jupiter, in my opinion.Access is lighter, has more power, a great pick-up, very good mileage, larger boot space and a good riding experience.Jupiter has good mileage too, but Access mileage is also right there.Access is a little more expensive though. But it's worth the extra price.
- TVS Jupiter will be a better pick here as it offers a lot more features and variety. Making it a very sound proposition for those who want a reliable, no-nonsense scooter. The frugal engine, comfortable ride quality and the fact that it is cheaper than the Honda Activa despite offering much more make it our pick as the best 110cc scooter on sale.
Q. Which one is better in between tvs jupiter,suzuki access & honda activa
- Jupiter any day!!* Best ride quality among Jupiter, Activa 5G and access* reasonable mileage while riding single (in fact better that our Activa 5G)* vibration free even at 80kmph while activa 5G vibrates very much over 70kmph* Bigger and better wheels (12inch wheels vs. 10inch for Activa and only a 12inch front wheel for access)* Telescopic suspension which provide very good control while braking, unlike the Activa having a suicidal suspension which loses control upon hard braking of front wheels* Jupiter is cheaper to service and repair than Activa 5G and Suzuki Access
- Jupiter is a bad bike, my friend bought it last year and complains alot. I own a Suzuki Access125 and it's great, I'd say go for it. Activa 5G is also a good bike I've used one of my friend's and the performance is good. So I suggest you go for Access 125 or Activa 5G
- Suzuki Access is better.. go for it..it has long seat, nice telescopic front suspension better style. and better pick up even if u r double seat.not worry to overtaking another vehicle.
Q. Which one is better in mileage comparing to Activa 5G, Jupiter & Suzuki Access 125
- All three scooters have similar fuel efficiency, depending on how you ride it.Nevertheless, I feel that the Activa is very boring to ride.The most fun ride with the highest power and torque figures and a smaller weight amongst the three is the Access 125.It is zippy, has a great pick-up, lighter and has 125cc and also has a great fuel efficiency. I have gotten a fuel efficiency of 55kmpl from my Access 125 on normal petrol and 60 on higher octane petrol.
- Three scooters are almost same mileage. difference is 1 or 2 km/liter. Go for reliable Scooter.my trust is on Access 125. nice Scooter
- Both jupiter and access have almost same mileage, activa 5g gives low mileage in comparison with the two
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
