Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Royal Enfield Interceptor 650

Last Updated: August 16, 2026

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 price starts at Rs. 1.38 Lakh, which is Rs. 2.00 Lakh cheaper than the base variant of Royal Enfield Interceptor 650, priced at Rs. 3.38 Lakh. In terms of mileage, the Hunter 350 offers a claimed 36.2 kmpl, while the Interceptor 650 delivers 25 kmpl. On the performance front, the Hunter 350 uses a 349cc engine producing 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm and the Interceptor 650 a 647.95cc engine producing 47.4 PS @ 7250 rpm. If you're deciding between the Hunter 350 and Interceptor 650, the Hunter 350 is the better pick for affordability and mileage, while the Interceptor 650 stands out for performance.

...Read More

Hunter 350 vs Interceptor 650 Comparison Summary

Specification Royal Enfield Hunter 350Royal Enfield Interceptor 650
Ex-showroom price (base) Rs. 1.38 LakhRs. 3.38 Lakh
Mileage 36.2 kmpl25 kmpl
Engine 349 cc647.95 cc
Max power 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm47.4 PS @ 7250 rpm
Kerb weight 177 Kg218 Kg

Hunter 350 vs Interceptor 650 Key Highlights

Basic Info Royal Enfield Hunter 350 BaseRoyal Enfield Interceptor 650 Standard
Rating
855 reviews
219 reviews
Brand Name Royal Enfield Royal Enfield
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.38 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 3.38 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled Inline Twin Cylinder, 4 Stroke / SOHC
Max Power 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm 47.4 PS @ 7250 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 Colors
Braking Type Anti-lock Braking System Not Available
Wheel Size Front :-17 Inch,Rear :-17 Inch Front :-457.2 mm,Rear :-457.2 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Spoke Spoke
ABS Single Channel Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Analogue Analogue
EMI
Rs. 3,965 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Rs. 9,252 @ 6% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 11,005 Hunter 350 Insurance Rs. 23,141 Interceptor 650 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Spark Plugs
1 Per Cylinder
1 Per Cylinder
Valves (per cylinder)
2
2
Claimed Top Speed
114 kmph
212 kmph
Emission Norm Compliance
bs6.2
bs6.2
Flex Fuel Blend
E20
E20
Engine Type
Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled
Inline Twin Cylinder, 4 Stroke / SOHC
Engine Displacement
349 cc
647.95 cc
Gear Box
5 Speed
6 Speed
Max Power
20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
47.4 PS @ 7250 rpm
Max Torque
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
52.3 Nm @ 5150 rpm
Bore
72 mm
78 mm
Stroke
85.8 mm
67.8 mm
Number Of Cylinders
1
2
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Fuel System
Electronic Injection
Fuel Injection
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
Electronic Fuel Injection
Digital spark ignition
Compression Ratio
9.5 : 1
9.5:1

Front Brake
Disc
Disc
Rear Brake
Drum
Disc
Front Caliper
2 Piston
2 Piston
Rear Caliper
1 Piston
1 Piston
Braking Type
Anti-lock Braking System
Not Available

Mileage (Overall)
36.2 kmpl
25 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
16.40s
Not Available
Braking 60-0 km/h
18.13m
Not Available
Braking 80-0 km/h
32.08m
Not Available
Braking 100-0 km/h
52.68m
Not Available
Estimated Mileage
35-40 kmpl
25-30 kmpl
Roll-ons 30-70 kmph (3rd Gear)
6.47s
Not Available
Roll-ons 40-80 kmph (4th Gear)
8.87s
Not Available
Fuel Gauge
Digital
Digital

Rear Suspension Preload Adjustment
Yes
Not Available
Rear Suspension Travel / Wheel Travel
100 mm
Not Available
Suspension-Front
Telescopic, 41mm forks
Telescopic Forks
Suspension-Rear
Twin shock absorbers with 6-step adjustable preload
Twin Gas Charged Shock Absorbers With Adjustable Preload

Front Tyre Pressure (Rider)
29 psi
32 psi
Front Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
29 psi
32 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider)
32 psi
36 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
33 psi
39 psi
Brake Fluid Grade
DOT4
Not Available
Tyre Size
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Front :-100/90-18, Rear :-130/70-R18
Wheel Size
Front :-17 Inch,Rear :-17 Inch
Front :-457.2 mm,Rear :-457.2 mm
Tyre Make
CEAT
Not Available
Tyre Type
Tube
Tube
Radial Tyre
Yes
Not Available
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Spoke
Spoke

Seat height
790 mm
804 mm
Load carrying capacity
179 kg
Not Available
Fuel Tank Reserve Capacity
2.6 L
2.7 L
Gross Weight
360 kg
400 kg
Engine Oil Capacity
2.2 L
Not Available
Engine Oil Grade
SAE 15W 50 API SL grade JASO MA2 semi synthetic
Not Available
Length*Width*Height
2055*810*1070 mm3
2119*835*1067 mm3
Wheelbase
1370 mm
1398 mm
Length
2055 mm
2119 mm
Ground Clearance
160 mm
174 mm
Height
1070 mm
1067 mm
Width
810 mm
835 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity
13 L
13.7 L
Kerb Weight
177 Kg
218 Kg
Tail Light
Bulb
Bulb
Front Brake Size
300 mm
320 mm
Rear Brake Size
153 mm
240 mm

Battery Type
Lead Acid
Not Available
Roadside assistance
Optional
Yes
USB charging port
Type C
Yes
Headlight
Halogen
Halogen Bulb
Battery Capacity
12V / 8AH
12V / 12AH

Frame Type
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
Steel Tubular, Double Cradle Frame
Digital Display Type
LCD
LCD Connectivity
Malfunction Indicator
Yes
Yes
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Pillion Seat
Yes
Yes
Pillion Grab Rail
Yes
Yes
Riding Modes
Yes
Not Available
Kill Switch
Yes
Yes
Low battery alert
Yes
Yes
No. of Tripmeters
3
2
Rear Footpegs
Yes
Yes
Multi-function Lock
Yes
Not Available
Additional Features/Information
Wet sump, forced lubrication, Paper element Air Cleaner
Paper Element, Forced Lubrication, Wet Sump With Pump Driven Oil Delivery
Gear Position Indicator
Yes
Not Available
ABS Type
Single Channel
Dual Channel
Side Stand Warning
Yes
Yes
Physical Key
Yes
Not Available
Exhaust Heat Shield
Yes
Not Available
Front Footpegs
Forward-set
Not Available
Body
Metal
Not Available
Instrument Cluster Control Switchcube
Yes
Not Available
ABS
Single Channel
Dual Channel
Body Type
Roadster Bikes
Roadster Bikes
Instrument Console Type
Analogue and Digital
Analogue and Digital
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Single
Pass Beam Switch
Yes
Yes
Speedometer
Analogue
Analogue
Tachometer
Not Available
Analogue
Gradeability
Not Available
24 degrees
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Yes
Yes
Clock
Yes
Not Available
Low Battery Indicator
Yes
Yes
Low Oil Indicator
Yes
Yes
Cooling System
Air & Oil Cooled
Air Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Service Due Indicator
Yes
Not Available
Saree Guard
Yes
Yes
Shift Light
Yes
Not Available
Hazard Light Switch
Yes
Not Available

1st Service
500 Km / 2 Months
500 Kms/45 Days
2nd Service
5000 Km / 6 Months
5000 Kms/180 Days
3rd Service
10000 Km / 12 Months
10000 Kms/365 Days
4th Service
15000 Km / 18 Months
15000 Kms

Vehicle Warranty
3 Years or 30,000 Km
3 Years or 40,000 Km
Standard Warranty (Years)
3
3
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
30000
40000

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • Offering easy accessibility
Royal Enfield Interceptor 650
  • Most affordable 650cc bike in India, Linear yet exciting power delivery, Extremely refined engine
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well
  • Absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity
Royal Enfield Interceptor 650
  • Lacks features, Uncomfortable for pillion riders, Rear suspension is a little too soft

Is Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 Better Than Royal Enfield Hunter 350?

57% users have chosen Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 over Royal Enfield Hunter 350 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 2154 users have also rated Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for performance and maintenance in your bike. But Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is better on the grounds of mileage and comfort. On the basis of features user have rated both the bikes equally.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Hunter 350 Interceptor 650
Mileage 3.7 3.9
Performance 4.8 4.4
Comfort 4.1 4.5
Maintenance 4.0 3.8
Features 4.4 4.4
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Review and Win Banner

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Royal Enfield Interceptor 650

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.
|Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Community

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Vs Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 FAQs

Which bike is best between Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Royal Enfield Interceptor 650?
As per the users experiences Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage and comfort in your bike. But Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 is better on the grounds of performance and maintenance. On the basis of features user have rated both the bikes equally.
Which bike is cheaper Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Royal Enfield Interceptor 650?
The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is cheaper than Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 by ₹2.00 Lakh.
Which bike offers better performance Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Royal Enfield Interceptor 650?
For the Base version, 349 cc Petrol engine of Hunter 350 produces 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Standard version, 647.95 cc Petrol engine of Interceptor 650 produces 47.4 PS @ 7250 rpm of power and 52.3 Nm @ 5150 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 has better performance.

Images of Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Which one do you like more?
Hunter 350
Hunter 350
Interceptor 650
Interceptor 650
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Royal Enfield Interceptor 650
×