Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 vs Ultraviolette F77

Last Updated: August 10, 2026

Ultraviolette F77 price starts at Rs. 3.09 Lakh, which is Rs. 44,105 cheaper than the base variant of Royal Enfield Continental GT 650, priced at Rs. 3.53 Lakh. In terms of efficiency, the Continental GT 650 returns a claimed 27 kmpl, while the F77 offers a claimed 211 km/charge. On the performance front, the Continental GT 650 uses a 647.95cc engine producing 47.4 PS @ 7150 rpm and the F77 a 7.1Kwh battery. If you're deciding between the Continental GT 650 and F77, the F77 is the better pick for affordability and a lighter kerb weight.

...Read More

Continental GT 650 vs F77 Comparison Summary

Specification Royal Enfield Continental GT 650Ultraviolette F77
Ex-showroom price (base) Rs. 3.53 LakhRs. 3.09 Lakh
Mileage / Range 27 kmpl211 km/charge
Engine / Battery 647.95 cc7.1 Kwh
Max power / Motor 47.4 PS @ 7150 rpmNot Available
Kerb weight 214 Kg197 Kg

Continental GT 650 vs F77 Key Highlights

Basic Info Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 StandardUltraviolette F77 Mach 2 Original
Rating
536 reviews
122 reviews
Brand Name Royal Enfield Ultraviolette
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 3.53 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 3.09 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type Inline Twin Cylinder, 4 Stroke, SOHC Not Available
Max Power 47.4 PS @ 7150 rpm Not Available
Fuel Type Petrol Electric
Colors
Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 Colors
Ultraviolette F77 Colors
Wheel Size Front :-457.2 mm,Rear :-457.2 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Spoke Alloy
Range Not Available 211 km/charge
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Push Button Start
Speedometer Analogue Digital
Running Cost Rs. 3.70/km Rs. 0.22/km
EMI
Rs. 9,668 @ 6% (36 months)
Not Available
Insurance Rs. 21,628 Continental GT 650 Insurance Rs. 18,262 F77 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Spark Plugs
1 Per Cylinder
Not Available
Valves (per cylinder)
4
Not Available
Claimed Top Speed
170 kmph
155 km/Hr
Emission Norm Compliance
bs6.2
Not Available
Motor Torque
Not Available
90 Nm
Flex Fuel Blend
E20
Not Available
Engine Type
Inline Twin Cylinder, 4 Stroke, SOHC
Not Available
Engine Displacement
647.95 cc
Not Available
Gear Box
6 Speed
Not Available
Max Power
47.4 PS @ 7150 rpm
Not Available
Max Torque
52.3 Nm @ 5150 rpm
Not Available
Bore
78 mm
Not Available
Stroke
67.8 mm
Not Available
Number Of Cylinders
2
Not Available
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Not Available
Battery Warranty
Not Available
3 Years or 60,000 Km
Fuel System
Fuel Injection
Not Available
Fuel Type
Petrol
Electric
Ignition
Digital Spark Ignition
Not Available
Compression Ratio
9.5:1
Not Available

Front Brake
Disc
Disc
Rear Brake
Disc
Disc
Front Caliper
2 Piston
Not Available
Rear Caliper
1 Piston
Not Available

Mileage (Overall)
27 kmpl
Not Available
0-100 Kmph (sec)
Not Available
7.8s
Estimated Mileage
25-30 kmpl
Not Available
Fuel Gauge
Digital
Not Available

Suspension-Front
41 mm front fork, Travel - 110 mm
Upside-down Telescopic fork with a diameter of 41 mm. Preload adjustable
Suspension-Rear
Coil-over shocks, Travel - 88 mm
Monoshock - preload adjustable

Front Tyre Pressure (Rider)
32 psi
Not Available
Front Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
32 psi
Not Available
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider)
36 psi
Not Available
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
39 psi
Not Available
Tyre Size
Front :-100/90-18, Rear :-130/70-18
Front :-110/70-17 Rear :-150/60-17
Wheel Size
Front :-457.2 mm,Rear :-457.2 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tube
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
Yes
Not Available
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Spoke
Alloy

Seat height
804 mm
800 mm
Fuel Tank Reserve Capacity
1.5 L
Not Available
Gross Weight
400 kg
Not Available
Length*Width*Height
2119*780*1067 mm3
Not Available
Wheelbase
1398 mm
1340 mm
Length
2119 mm
Not Available
Ground Clearance
174 mm
160 mm
Height
1067 mm
Not Available
Width
780 mm
Not Available
Fuel Tank Capacity
12.5 L
Not Available
Kerb Weight
214 Kg
197 Kg
Tail Light
Bulb
LED
Front Brake Size
320 mm
320 mm
Rear Brake Size
240 mm
230 mm

Battery Type
Not Available
Li-ion
Motor Type
Not Available
Permanent Magnet AC Motor
Motor Power
Not Available
27 kW
Claimed range
Not Available
211 km/charge
Call/SMS Alerts
Not Available
Yes
Regenerative braking
Not Available
Yes
Roadside assistance
Yes
Not Available
USB charging port
Not Available
Yes
Range (Mode 1)
Not Available
183 km/charge
Range (Mode 2)
Not Available
144 km/charge
Range (Mode 3)
Not Available
128 km/charge
Range
Not Available
211 km/charge
Fast Charging
Not Available
Yes
Headlight
LED
LED
Fast Charging Time
Not Available
20% - 80% in 45 Min.
Charging at Home
Not Available
Yes
Battery Capacity
12V / 12AH
7.1 Kwh

Frame Type
Steel Tubular, Double Cradle Frame
Steel Trellis with Aluminium Bulk Head
Digital Display Type
Not Available
TFT
Malfunction Indicator
Yes
Not Available
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Vehicle Location Tracking
Not Available
Yes
Pillion Seat
Not Available
Yes
Pillion Grab Rail
Not Available
Yes
Calls and Messaging
Not Available
Yes
Riding Modes
Not Available
Yes
Kill Switch
Yes
Not Available
Low battery alert
Yes
Yes
No. of Tripmeters
2
Not Available
Hill Hold
Not Available
Yes
Rear Footpegs
Yes
Yes
Additional Features/Information
Not Available
Riding Mode - Glide | Combat | Ballistic, Dynamic stability control, Park assist, Deep sleep, Throttle control, GPS
Gear Position Indicator
Yes
Not Available
ABS Type
Dual Channel
Dual Channel
Side Stand Warning
Yes
Yes
Exhaust Heat Shield
Yes
Not Available
ABS
Dual Channel
Dual Channel
Body Type
Cafe Racer Bikes
Electric Bikes, Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
Yes
Not Available
Instrument Console Type
Analogue and Digital
Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
Not Available
Bluetooth,WiFi
Internet Connectivity
Not Available
Yes
Starting
Self Start Only
Push Button Start
Seat Type
Split
Split
Operating System
Not Available
UV Automotive Linux
Pass Beam Switch
Yes
Not Available
Speedometer
Analogue
Digital
Mobile Application
Not Available
Yes
Tachometer
Analogue
Not Available
Gradeability
24°
Not Available
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Yes
Not Available
Clock
Not Available
Digital
Low Battery Indicator
Yes
Yes
Low Oil Indicator
Yes
Not Available
Charger Output
Not Available
1200 W
Cooling System
Air Cooled
Not Available
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Switchable ABS
Not Available
Yes
Saree Guard
Yes
Not Available
Hazard Light Switch
Yes
Yes

1st Service
500 Kms/45 Days
Not Available
2nd Service
5000 Kms/180 Days
Not Available
3rd Service
10000 Kms/365 Days
Not Available
4th Service
15000 Kms/550 Days
Not Available

Vehicle Warranty
3 Years or 40,000 Km
3 Years or 30,000 Km
Standard Warranty (Years)
3
3
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
40000
30000

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Royal Enfield Continental GT 650
  • Classic retro styling appeals to many
  • Not-too-aggressive riding posture
  • Great handling & nice exhaust note
Ultraviolette F77
  • Handles like a proper sportbike
  • Torquey motor provides punchy acceleration
  • Ride quality is surprisingly good
  • Looks like nothing else on Indian roads
Royal Enfield Continental GT 650
  • Could have better brakes
  • Clutch is on slightly heavier side
  • Customization options are limited
Ultraviolette F77
  • Riding position can feel aggressive to some
  • ABS feels a bit intrusive
  • It is quite expensive

Is Ultraviolette F77 Better Than Royal Enfield Continental GT 650?

83% users have chosen Ultraviolette F77 over Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 1354 users have also rated Ultraviolette F77 and Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Ultraviolette F77 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for comfort and features in your bike. But Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 is better on the grounds of mileage, performance and maintenance.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor F77 Continental GT 650
Mileage 3.7 3.8
Performance 3.9 4.7
Comfort 4.6 4.3
Maintenance 3.6 3.9
Features 4.9 4.2
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Review and Win Banner

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 and Ultraviolette F77

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which is better bike overall all parameters such as (very good Mileage, very good city & highway performance, very good After sale service,Good resale value, Most value for Money & Cheap maintenance cost among 2026 Bajaj Pulsar N160 USD dual ABS, 2026 Hero Xtreme 160R4vdualABS & 2026 TVS Apache RTR 160 4v dual ABS ? I want a clear answer. Please reply accordingly.?
  • Among the 2026 Bajaj Pulsar N160 USD Dual ABS, Hero Xtreme 160R 4V Dual ABS, and TVS Apache RTR 160 4V Dual ABS, each has its strengths: the Pulsar N160 offers balanced all-round performance and lower maintenance, the Apache RTR 160 4V excels in features and sporty performance, and the Xtreme 160R 4V delivers good mileage with strong service support. The best choice depends on your priorities — mileage, performance, features, or resale value. You can compare these bikes side-by-side by click on the given link: https://www.zigwheels.com/bikes/comparison/
Q. Which bike is better, TVS Apache RR 310 or Royal Enfield Continental GT 650?
  • Selecting between the Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 and TVS Apache RR 310 would depend on certain factors such as your budget, preference of the segment, performance figures, features required, etc. The Continental GT 650 is a fun to ride cafe racer. The GT’s sporty riding position makes it much more suitable for twisty mountain roads and even high-speed straight-line blasts. To top things off, the twin-cylinder motor provides the performance and refinement that the 535 simply couldn’t. On the other hand, TVS has done an incredible job in ironing out the sore spots of the Apache RR 310 with the BS6 update. It is loaded with tech, making it the most technologically advanced motorcycle in its class. The new prices are quite close to its fiercest rival -- the KTM RC 390. While it may lack the outright performance of the RC 390, the Apache RR 310 BS6 makes up for it by being a well-rounded machine that can do daily duties as well as corner carving or even touring, for that matter. For a better understanding of compatibility and riding comfort, we would suggest you take a test ride. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership.
Q. Which one is better Himalayan or GT 650
  • Both Royal Enfield Himalayan and Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 are brilliant options, however, selecting one would depend on certain factors such as your budget, preference of the segment, usage of the bike, features requirement, etc. The Himalayan BS6 is a well-rounded package which is now just that little bit better than before. The Himalayan certainly isn’t flawless or entirely satisfactory in any singular aspect, but it makes up for these gaps by painting a picture of opportunity, inciting you to travel and explore on a whim. On the other hand, the GT’s sporty riding position makes it much more suitable for twisty mountain roads and even high-speed straight-line blasts. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride for a better understanding of performance and comfort. Click on the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
|Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 Community

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 Vs Ultraviolette F77 FAQs

Which bike is best between Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 vs Ultraviolette F77?
As per the users experiences Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage, performance and maintenance in your bike. But Ultraviolette F77 is better on the grounds of comfort and features.
Which bike is cheaper Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 vs Ultraviolette F77?
The Ultraviolette F77 is cheaper than Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 by ₹44,105.
Which bike offers better performance Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 vs Ultraviolette F77?
As per the users experiences the Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 has better performance.

Images of Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 and Ultraviolette F77

Which one do you like more?
F77
F77
Continental GT 650
Continental GT 650
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 vs Ultraviolette F77
×