Bajaj Pulsar RS200 vs KTM 160 Duke

Last Updated: August 8, 2026

Bajaj Pulsar RS200 price starts at Rs. 1.77 Lakh, which is Rs. 7,452 cheaper than the base variant of KTM 160 Duke, priced at Rs. 1.84 Lakh. In terms of mileage, the Pulsar RS200 offers a claimed 35 kmpl, while the 160 Duke delivers 36.5 kmpl. On the performance front, the Pulsar RS200 uses a 199.5cc engine producing 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm and the 160 Duke a 164.2cc engine producing 19 PS @ 9500 rpm. If you're deciding between the Pulsar RS200 and 160 Duke, the Pulsar RS200 is the better pick for affordability and performance, while the 160 Duke stands out for mileage and a lighter kerb weight.

...Read More

Pulsar RS200 vs 160 Duke Comparison Summary

Specification Bajaj Pulsar RS200KTM 160 Duke
Ex-showroom price (base) Rs. 1.77 LakhRs. 1.84 Lakh
Mileage 35 kmpl36.5 kmpl
Engine 199.5 cc164.2 cc
Max power 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm19 PS @ 9500 rpm
Kerb weight 159.5 Kg147 Kg

Pulsar RS200 vs 160 Duke Key Highlights

Basic Info Bajaj Pulsar RS200 STDKTM 160 Duke STD
Rating
14 reviews
3 reviews
Brand Name Bajaj KTM
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.77 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 1.84 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type Liquid Cooled, Single Spark 4-Valve, FI Engine Liquid Cooled, 4 stroke, Single Cylinder, SOHC, Internal Combustion Engine
Max Power 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm 19 PS @ 9500 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Bajaj Pulsar RS200 Colors
KTM 160 Duke Colors
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
EMI
Rs. 5,275 @ 11.99% (36 months)
Rs. 5,300 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 11,658 Pulsar RS200 Insurance Rs. 11,783 160 Duke Insurance
Brochure N/A
Download Brochure

Spark Plugs
1 Per Cylinder
Not Available
Valves (per cylinder)
4
Not Available
Claimed Top Speed
141 kmph
Not Available
Emission Norm Compliance
bs6.2
bs6.2
Flex Fuel Blend
E20
Not Available
Engine Type
Liquid Cooled, Single Spark 4-Valve, FI Engine
Liquid Cooled, 4 stroke, Single Cylinder, SOHC, Internal Combustion Engine
Engine Displacement
199.5 cc
164.2 cc
Gear Box
6 Speed
6 Speed
Max Power
24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm
19 PS @ 9500 rpm
Max Torque
18.74 Nm @ 8000 rpm
15.5 Nm @ 7500 rpm
Bore
72 mm
66 mm
Stroke
49 mm
48 mm
Number Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Fuel System
Fuel Injection
Fuel Injection
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Compression Ratio
11 ± 0.5:1
11.97 : 1

Front Brake
Disc
Disc
Rear Brake
Disc
Disc
Front Caliper
2 Piston
4 Piston
Rear Caliper
1 Piston
2 Piston

Mileage (Overall)
35 kmpl
36.5 kmpl
Average Speed
Not Available
Yes
Estimated Mileage
35-40 kmpl
Not Available
Fuel Gauge
Digital
Digital

Suspension-Front
Telescopic with anti-friction bush
USD Front Fork, 138.2 mm
Suspension-Rear
Nitrox mono shock absorber with Canister
Monoshock Suspension, 160.98 mm

Front Tyre Pressure (Rider)
25 psi
Not Available
Front Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
25 psi
Not Available
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider)
28 psi
Not Available
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
32 psi
Not Available
Tyre Size
Front :-110/70-17Rear :-140/70-17
Front :-110/70-17,Rear :-140/60-17
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy

Seat height
810 mm
815 mm
Fuel Tank Reserve Capacity
2.6 L
Not Available
Length*Width*Height
2017*804*1075 mm3
Not Available
Wheelbase
1363 mm
1357 mm
Length
2017 mm
Not Available
Ground Clearance
168 mm
174 mm
Height
1075 mm
Not Available
Width
804 mm
Not Available
Fuel Tank Capacity
13 L
10.1 L
Kerb Weight
159.5 Kg
147 Kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Front Brake Size
300 mm
320 mm
Rear Brake Size
230 mm
230 mm

Call/SMS Alerts
Yes
Yes
Headlight
LED
LED
Battery Capacity
12V / 8AH
12V / 8AH
Projector head light
Yes
Yes

Frame Type
Pressed steel perimeter beam section frame
Split Trellis Frame
Digital Display Type
LCD
LCD
Malfunction Indicator
Yes
Yes
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Vehicle Location Tracking
Yes
Not Available
Pillion Seat
Yes
Yes
Pillion Grab Rail
Yes
Yes
Calls and Messaging
Yes
Yes
Navigation assist
Yes
Yes
Riding Modes
Rain,Road,Off-Road
Yes
Kill Switch
Yes
Yes
Low battery alert
Yes
Not Available
Brightness Control
Yes
Not Available
No. of Tripmeters
2
2
Engine Temperature Indicator
Yes
Yes
Rear Footpegs
Yes
Yes
Daytime Running Lamps
Yes
Yes
Additional Features/Information
Integrated Ambient Light Sensor
SuperMoto Mode
Windscreen
Yes
Not Available
Gear Position Indicator
Yes
Yes
Average Fuel Economy Indicator
Yes
Yes
ABS Type
Dual Channel
Dual Channel
Distance To Empty
Yes
Yes
Side Stand Warning
Yes
Yes
ABS
Dual Channel
Dual Channel
Body Type
Sports Bikes
Sports Naked Bikes, Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
Yes
Yes
Instrument Console Type
Digital
Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
Bluetooth
Bluetooth
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Split
Pass Beam Switch
Yes
Yes
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Mobile Application
Not Available
Yes
Tachometer
Digital
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Yes
Yes
Clock
Yes
Digital
Low Battery Indicator
Yes
Not Available
Low Oil Indicator
Yes
Yes
Cooling System
Liquid Cooled
Liquid Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
Yes
Yes
Service Due Indicator
Yes
Yes
Saree Guard
Yes
Yes
Shift Light
Yes
Not Available

1st Service
500-750 Km / 30-45 Days
Not Available
2nd Service
4500-5000 Km / 8 Months
Not Available
3rd Service
9500-10000 Km / 1 Year
Not Available

Vehicle Warranty
5 Years or 75,000 Km
Not Available
Standard Warranty (Years)
5
Not Available
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
75000
Not Available

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Bajaj Pulsar RS200
  • Riding posture is comfortable
  • Engine loves to be revved high
  • Twin projector headlight provides good illumination
KTM 160 Duke
  • Sporty Looks
  • A powerful engine
Bajaj Pulsar RS200
  • 10-year old styling
  • Fit and finish not up to the mark
  • Still does not get an USD fork
KTM 160 Duke
  • The pillion seat is narrow
  • No traction control

Is Bajaj Pulsar RS200 Better Than KTM 160 Duke?

50% users have chosen Bajaj Pulsar RS200 over KTM 160 Duke in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 29 users have also rated Bajaj Pulsar RS200 and KTM 160 Duke on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
KTM 160 Duke is better on the grounds of mileage, comfort and maintenance. On the basis of performance, safety and features user have rated both the bikes equally.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor 160 Duke Pulsar RS200
Mileage 3.8 4.3
Performance 4.7 4.7
Comfort 3.9 5.0
Maintenance 3.8 4.0
Safety 3.0 3.0
Features 1.7 1.7
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Review and Win Banner

Bajaj Pulsar RS200 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Bajaj Pulsar RS200 and KTM 160 Duke

Bajaj Pulsar RS200 Vs KTM 160 Duke FAQs

Which bike is best between Bajaj Pulsar RS200 vs KTM 160 Duke?
KTM 160 Duke is better on the grounds of mileage, comfort and maintenance. On the basis of performance, safety and features user have rated both the bikes equally.
Which bike is cheaper Bajaj Pulsar RS200 vs KTM 160 Duke?
The Bajaj Pulsar RS200 is cheaper than KTM 160 Duke by ₹7,452.
Which bike offers better performance Bajaj Pulsar RS200 vs KTM 160 Duke?
For the STD version, 199.5 cc Petrol engine of Pulsar RS200 produces 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm of power and 18.74 Nm @ 8000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the STD version, 164.2 cc Petrol engine of 160 Duke produces 19 PS @ 9500 rpm of power and 15.5 Nm @ 7500 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences in terms of performance both are same.

Images of KTM 160 Duke and Bajaj Pulsar RS200

Which one do you like more?
160 Duke
160 Duke
Pulsar RS200
Pulsar RS200
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Bajaj Pulsar RS200 vs KTM 160 Duke
×