×
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Bajaj Pulsar NS160 vs Bajaj Pulsar 180F Comparison

Bajaj Pulsar NS160 vs Bajaj Pulsar 180F Comparison

Bajaj Pulsar NS160 vs Bajaj Pulsar 180F

Any question on your mind about which bike to buy? Compare Bajaj Pulsar NS160 vs Bajaj Pulsar 180F on the basis of price, specifications & other features. Bajaj Pulsar NS160 Price starts from Rs. 82,624 and Bajaj Pulsar 180F Price starts from Rs. 94,790. The claimed mileage for the Bajaj Pulsar NS160 is 40.6 kmpl and for the Bajaj Pulsar 180F is NA. Bajaj Pulsar NS160 is available in 3 different colours while Bajaj Pulsar 180F comes with 1 colours. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar NS160 is powered by 160.3 cc engine where as Bajaj Pulsar 180F is powered by 178.6 cc engine.

Engine Type Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 4-Valve, SOHC, DTS-i Engine Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, Twin Spark, DTS-i Engine
Engine Displacement (CC) 160.3 cc 178.6 cc
Power (PS@rpm) 15.5 PS @ 8500 rpm 17.02 PS @ 8500 rpm
Torque (Nm@rpm) 14.6 Nm @ 6500 14.22 Nm @ 6500 rpm
Bore
Stroke
No Of Cylinders 1 1
Drive Type Chain Drive Chain Drive
Valves (per cylinder) 4 2
Fuel System Carburetor Fuel Injection
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Ignition Digital Twin Spark Twin Spark
Transmission Type Manual
No Of Gears 5 Speed 5 Speed
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
0-60 kmph (sec) 5.35
Quarter Mile 19.53s@104.15 kmph Sec
Braking (60-0 kmph) 2.83s, 20.18m Sec
20-80 kmph (kickdown)
30-70 kmph (3rd gear) 5.61
40-80 kmph (4th gear) 7.29 Sec
Braking (80-0 kmph) 3.82s, 39.54m Sec
Braking (100-0 kmph)
Mileage (City) 40.6 kmpl
Mileage (Highway) 48 kmpl
Mileage (Overall)
Mileage (ARAI) kmpl 40.6 kmpl
0-100 kmph (sec) 16.54
Top Speed (Km/h) 111.17 kmph
Chassis Type Perimeter Frame
Suspension-Front Telescopic with Anti-friction Bush Telescopic with Anti Friction Bush
Suspension-Rear Nitrox mono shock absorber with Canister 5 Way Adjustable, Nitrox Shock Absorber
Tyre Size (Front) 90/90-17 90/90-17
Tyre Size (Rear) 120/80-17 120/80-17
Wheel Size Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch
Tyre Make
Tyre Type Tubeless Tubeless
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
Dry Weight
Length*Width*Height 2017*803*1060 2035*765*1115
Wheelbase(mm) 1370 mm 1345 mm
Ground Clearance (mm) 176 mm 165 mm
Seat Height 790 mm
Fuel Capacity (Litres) 12 L 15 L
Kerb Weight 145 Kg 151 Kg
Battery 12 V 12 V
Head Lamp Halogen Halogen
Projector head light
Pilot Lamps
LED tail lights
ABS no Single Channel
Body Graphics
Starting Kick and Self Start Self Start Only
Pass Switch Yes Yes
Speedometer Digital Digital
Tachometer Analogue Analogue
Trip Meter Digital Digital
Average Fuel economy
Digital Fuel Indicator yes yes
Distance to Empty
Low Fuel Warning Lamp Yes
Clock
Stand Alarm
Stepup Seat
Passenger Footrest
Passenger Backrest
Carry hook
Underseat storage
Standard Warranty (Years) 2
Standard Warranty (kilometers) 30000

Also Read Comparison Reviews of :

Similar Bike Comparisons

Compare Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

  • Bajaj Pulsar NS160 question
    Q. Which one is best looking NS160 or Pulsar 180F?
    Aditya | 1 week ago

    As far as looks are concerned, NS160 is definitely better with a new design theme and fresh graphics!

    3 Reply
  • Bajaj Pulsar NS160 question
    Q. My height is 6 feet which bike suit me NS160 or Apache RTR 160 4V?
    Zigwheels | 1 month ago

    The seat height of NS 160 is 805 mm which is 5 mm more than that of Apache RTR 160 4V. Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 possibly be more comfortable than the TVS Apache RTR 160 4V. Moreover, we'd request you to take a test ride for both bikes to judge the comfort level better. Follow the link below to check out more: https://www.zigwheels.com/news-features/news/tvs-apache-rtr-160-4v-vs-honda-xblade-vs-bajaj-pulsar-ns-160-spec-comparison/30001/

    1 Reply
    P | 1 month ago

    Pulsar NS 160

    0 Reply
    View 1 More Answer
  • Bajaj Pulsar NS160 question
    Q. Which bike has best results between NS160 or Apache RTR 160 4V?
    Kick | 1 month ago

    1if you want a high torque and feel more power then definitely go for apacheif speed is your preference then ns is faster2silencer note is better in apachens is not also bad3apache is more modernasns was released way before and minor changes have occured4riding position in apache is not so good for a tall person i am 6'1 and i am having problemns has much better comfortboth are very good you can compare them to yamaha fz also

    0 Reply
    Nantha | 3 days ago

    Ns 160

    0 Reply
    View 2 More Answer
View More Questions View More Questions

Top Commuters Comparisons

Top Cruisers Comparisons

Top Sports Comparisons

Top Scooters Comparisons