Komaki Ranger vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
Last Updated: November 2, 2026
Komaki Ranger price starts at Rs. 1.32 Lakh, which is Rs. 34,011 cheaper than the base variant of Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0, priced at Rs. 1.67 Lakh. In terms of efficiency, the MT 15 Version 2.0 returns a claimed 56.87 kmpl, while the Ranger offers a claimed 160-200 km/charge. On the performance front, the Ranger uses a 4Kwh battery and the MT 15 Version 2.0 a 155cc engine producing 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm. If you're deciding between the Ranger and MT 15 Version 2.0, the Ranger is the better pick for affordability.
...Read More
Ranger vs MT 15 Version 2.0 Comparison Summary
| Specification | Komaki Ranger | Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Ex-showroom price (base) | Rs. 1.32 Lakh | Rs. 1.67 Lakh |
| Mileage / Range | 160-200 km/charge | 56.87 kmpl |
| Engine / Battery | 4 Kwh | 155 cc |
| Max power / Motor | Not Available | 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm |
| Kerb weight | Not Available | 141 Kg |
-
Komaki Ranger
Rs. 1.32 Lakh View November OffersYamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
Rs. 1.67 Lakh EMI - Rs. 4,797 View November Offers
Ranger vs MT 15 Version 2.0 Key Highlights
| Basic Info | Komaki Ranger STD | Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 Metallic Black |
|---|---|---|
| Rating |
81 reviews
|
1695 reviews
|
| Brand Name | Komaki | Yamaha |
| Ex-Showroom Price | Rs. 1.32 Lakh Check On Road Price | Rs. 1.67 Lakh Check On Road Price |
| Engine Type | Not Available | Liquid Cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve |
| Max Power | Not Available | 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Petrol |
| Colors | ||
| Braking Type | Combi Brake System | Not Available |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm Rear :-431.8 mm inch |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| Range | 160-200 km/charge | Not Available |
| Charging Time | 3-4 Hr | Not Available |
| ABS | Not Available | Dual Channel |
| Starting | Remote Start,Push Button Start | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Running Cost | Rs. 0.16/km | Rs. 1.76/km |
| EMI | Not Available |
Rs. 4,797
@
9.45% (36 months)
|
| Insurance | Rs. 5,638 Ranger Insurance | Rs. 11,490 MT 15 Version 2.0 Insurance |
| Brochure |
Download
Brochure
|
Download
Brochure
|
Engine/Motor |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brakes |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Suspension |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tyres |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dimensions |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electricals |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Features |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service Cost |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warranty |
|
Pros and Cons
- Positives
- Negatives
Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
- A refined engine
- Sporty handling, and nimble
- Looks aggressive
Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
- Lacks bottom end grunt
- Stiff suspension
- Pillion seat is not comfortable
Videos of Komaki Ranger and Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
Latest News on Komaki Ranger and Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. What should I buy between Yamaha MT 15 V2 and R15S?
- Yes
- MT 15 V2 bike
- Both the bikes are good in their forte. The updates as expected have made the new MT-15 a better bike. It looks more premium, handles better and the addition of a few new features is welcome. But we were expecting more from Yamaha! The dullness of the engine is disappointing and the lack of dual-channel ABS is just beyond any reasoning with this performance on tap. As for goodies such as a quick-shifter and traction control, they should have been offered as part of a premium variant. On the other hand, the Yamaha R15S remains one potent small-capacity supersport for beginners. In its version 3.0 guise, it has become sharper and more focused, making it great for sport riding or trac enthusiasts. However, the aggressive riding stance could cause discomfort if you intend to use the bike for daily commuting and the quality of components have also gone down. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride for a better understanding of performance and comfort. Click on the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
Q. Which bike is the best between, Yamaha MT-15 Version 2.0 or KTM 200 Duke?
- Both the bikes are good in their forte. The design update has given the KTM 200 Duke a new lease of life. Also, the fact that the new BS6-compliant motor does not lose out on performance almost makes it feel like a win-win. That said, the substantial hike in price means it is now more expensive than larger motorcycles such as the Suzuki Gixxer 250. However, when it comes to thrills, the KTM 200 Duke delivers it in spades! On the other hand, The updates as expected have made the new MT-15 a better bike. It looks more premium, handles better and the addition of a few new features is welcome. But we were expecting more from Yamaha! The dullness of the engine is disappointing and the lack of dual-channel ABS is just beyond any reasoning with this performance on tap. As for goodies such as a quick-shifter and traction control, they should have been offered as part of a premium variant. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.Read more -Yamaha MT-15 Version 2.0 Road Test Review - The Perfect Imperfection.
Komaki Ranger Vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 FAQs
Which bike is best between Komaki Ranger vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0?
On the basis of mileage, performance, comfort, maintenance and features user have rated both the bikes equally.
Which bike is cheaper Komaki Ranger vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0?
The Komaki Ranger is cheaper than Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 by ₹34,011.
Which bike offers better performance Komaki Ranger vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0?
As per the users experiences in terms of performance both are same.
Images of Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 and Komaki Ranger
Which one do you like more?
- Home ›
- New Bikes ›
- Compare Bikes ›
- Komaki Ranger vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
×

