Kabira Mobility KM4000 Mark 2 vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0

Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 Price starts at Rs. 1.59 Lakh which is Rs. 8,100 costlier than base model of Kabira KM4000 Mark 2 priced at Rs. 1.51 Lakh. In technical specifications, Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 is powered by 155 cc engine. Kabira KM4000 Mark 2 is available in 2 different colours while Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 comes with 5 colours. The Comparison Kabira KM4000 Mark 2 vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

KM4000 Mark 2 vs MT 15 Version 2.0

Key Highlights KM4000 Mark 2 BMT 15 Version 2.0 Metallic Black
Engine Type ... Liquid Cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve
Max Power 12 kW 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm
Top Speed 120 km/Hr 122 kmph
Range 178 km/charge ...
Charging Time 3 Hr ...

KM4000 Mark 2 vs MT 15 Version 2.0 Key Highlights

Basic Info Kabira Mobility KM4000 Mark 2 BYamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 Metallic Black
Rating
24 reviews
1674 reviews
Brand Name Kabira Mobility Yamaha
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.51 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 1.59 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type ... Liquid Cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve
Max Power 12 kW 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm
Fuel Type Electric Petrol
Colors
Kabira Mobility KM4000 Mark 2 Colors
Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Braking Type Combi Brake System ...
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm Rear :-431.8 mm inch
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
Range 178 km/charge ...
Charging Time 3 Hr ...
ABS ... Dual Channel
Starting Push Button Start Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
Running Cost Rs. 0.15/km Rs. 1.76/km
EMI ...
Rs. 4,581 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 5,916 KM4000 Mark 2 Insurance Rs. 13,489 MT 15 Version 2.0 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Torque (motor)
192 Nm
...
Engine Type
...
Liquid Cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve
Engine Displacement
...
155 cc
No. Of Batteries
1
...
Max Power
12 kW
18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm
Max Torque
...
14.1 Nm @ 7500 rpm
Emission Type
...
bs6-2.0
Bore
...
58.0 mm
Stroke
...
58.7 mm
Motor IP Rating
IP67
...
No Of Cylinders
...
1
Drive Type
Hub Motor
Chain Drive
Battery Warranty
3 Years or 30,000 Km
...
Valve Per Cylinder
...
4
Motor Warranty
1 Years, 10000 km
...
Fuel Type
Electric
Petrol
Compression Ratio
...
11.6 : 1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Disc
Disc
Braking Type
Combi Brake System
...

Braking (60-0 kmph)
...
19.79m
Braking (80-0 kmph)
...
35.05m
Braking (100-0 kmph)
...
58.20m
Mileage (City)
...
56.87 kmpl
Mileage (Highway)
...
47.94 kmpl
Mileage (Overall)
...
56.87 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
9.5s
14.28s
Top Speed
120 km/Hr
122 kmph

Tyre Size
Front :-110/70-17, Rear :-140/60-17
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/70R-17
Peak Power
12 kW
18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm Rear :-431.8 mm inch
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
...
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
...
32 psi

Seat height
815 mm
810 mm
Length*Width*Height
2080*702*1141 mm3
2015*800*1070 mm3
Wheelbase
1412 mm
1325 mm
Length
2080 mm
2015 mm
Ground Clearance
175 mm
170 mm
Height
1141 mm
1070 mm
Width
702 mm
800 mm
Fuel Capacity
...
10 Liters
Kerb Weight
152 Kg
141 Kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Saddle Height
815 mm
810 mm
Front Brake Diameter
320 mm
282 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
230 mm
220 mm

Battery Type
Li-ion
...
Motor Type
BLDC
...
Additional Features
Ridig Modes - Eco | City | Sports | Parking | Reverse, Water Wading Limit - 200 mm, IOT Device, Saree Guard, Charger Type On-Board, Multiple High Precision Temperature Sensor, Gen5 Thermal Management On Motor
Variable Valve Actuation (VVA)
Claimed range
178 km/charge
...
Charging network / Battery swapping network
...
Call/SMS Alerts
...
Regenerative braking
...
Roadside assistance
...
USB charging port
...
OTA
...
Range
178 km/charge
...
Fast Charging
...
Headlight
LED
LED
Charging at Home
...
Range (Eco Mode)
130 km/charge
...
Battery Capacity
4.1 Kwh
12V / 4AH
Charging at Charging Station
...
Range (Normal Mode)
110 km/charge
...
Charging Time
3 Hr
...
Pilot Lamps
...
Range (Sport Mode)
80 km/charge
...
Charging Time(0-100%)
3 Hours
...
Turn Signal Lamp
LED
LED

Cruise Control
...
Frame
Diamond Steel Tube
Deltabox
ABS
...
Dual Channel
Body Type
Sports Naked Bikes, Electric Bikes, Sports Bikes
Sports Naked Bikes, Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
Instrument Console
Digital
Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
Bluetooth
...
Internet Connectivity
...
Starting
Push Button Start
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Split
Pass Switch
Display
5 Inch, TFT
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Mobile Application
...
Tripmeter
Digital
Digital
Charging Point
...
Gradeability
16 Degree
...
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
...
Techometer
...
Digital
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
...
Low Oil Indicator
...
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights
...
Underseat storage
13 L
...
Charger Output
1500 W
...
Cooling System
...
Liquid Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
EBS
...
DRLs
...

Standard Warranty (Years)
3
2
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
30000
30000

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
  • A refined engine
  • Sporty handling, and nimble
  • Looks aggressive
Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
  • Lacks bottom end grunt
  • Stiff suspension
  • Pillion seat is not comfortable
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Review and Win Banner

Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Kabira Mobility KM4000 Mark 2 and Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. What should I buy between Yamaha MT 15 V2 and R15S?
  • Yes
  • MT 15 V2 bike
  • Both the bikes are good in their forte. The updates as expected have made the new MT-15 a better bike. It looks more premium, handles better and the addition of a few new features is welcome. But we were expecting more from Yamaha! The dullness of the engine is disappointing and the lack of dual-channel ABS is just beyond any reasoning with this performance on tap. As for goodies such as a quick-shifter and traction control, they should have been offered as part of a premium variant. On the other hand, the Yamaha R15S remains one potent small-capacity supersport for beginners. In its version 3.0 guise, it has become sharper and more focused, making it great for sport riding or trac enthusiasts. However, the aggressive riding stance could cause discomfort if you intend to use the bike for daily commuting and the quality of components have also gone down. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride for a better understanding of performance and comfort. Click on the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
Q. Which bike is the best between, Yamaha MT-15 Version 2.0 or KTM 200 Duke?
  • Both the bikes are good in their forte. The design update has given the KTM 200 Duke a new lease of life. Also, the fact that the new BS6-compliant motor does not lose out on performance almost makes it feel like a win-win. That said, the substantial hike in price means it is now more expensive than larger motorcycles such as the Suzuki Gixxer 250. However, when it comes to thrills, the KTM 200 Duke delivers it in spades! On the other hand, The updates as expected have made the new MT-15 a better bike. It looks more premium, handles better and the addition of a few new features is welcome. But we were expecting more from Yamaha! The dullness of the engine is disappointing and the lack of dual-channel ABS is just beyond any reasoning with this performance on tap. As for goodies such as a quick-shifter and traction control, they should have been offered as part of a premium variant. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.Read more -Yamaha MT-15 Version 2.0 Road Test Review - The Perfect Imperfection.
Q. Which is better bike between Kabira Mobility KM 4000 and Kabira Mobility KM 3000?
  • The KM 4000 and the KM 3000 share the same motor and lithium-ion battery pack, however, the usable capacity is different. While the naked uses a 4.4kWh pack, it goes down to 4kWh on its faired sibling. Even the power outputs are different. The 8kW motor on the naked churns 5kW of continuous power while the faired bike’s 6kW motor manages to produce 3.5kW of continuous power. With faired motorcycles generally associated with more performance, this comes as a bit of a surprise. In terms of hardware too, the KM 4000 gets better equipment in form of USD forks and dual discs at the front. The KM 3000 does with conventional telescopic forks and a single disc at the front. Both the bikes get the same disc at the rear and are aided by a combined braking system. Kabira says that their customer surveys revealed that customers were expecting more performance from the naked, while they wanted the faired bike to be more of a commuter. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
|Kabira KM4000 Mark 2 Community

Kabira Mobility KM4000 Mark 2 Vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 FAQs

Which bike is best between Kabira Mobility KM4000 Mark 2 vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0?
Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 is better on the grounds of mileage, performance, comfort and features. On the basis of maintenance user have rated both the bikes equally.
Which bike is cheaper Kabira Mobility KM4000 Mark 2 vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0?
The Kabira KM4000 Mark 2 is cheaper than Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 by ₹8,100.
Which bike offers better performance Kabira Mobility KM4000 Mark 2 vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0?
As per the users experiences the Kabira KM4000 Mark 2 has better performance.

Images of Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 and Kabira KM4000 Mark 2

Which one do you like more?
MT 15 Version 2.0
MT 15 Version 2.0
KM4000 Mark 2
KM4000 Mark 2
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Kabira Mobility KM4000 Mark 2 vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
×