Honda XBlade vs Yamaha FZS V3 Comparison
Honda XBlade vs Yamaha FZS V3
Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 Price starts at Rs. 98,680 which is Rs. 18,355 costlier than Honda XBlade priced at Rs. 80,325. The claimed mileage for the Honda XBlade is NA where as the claimed mileage for Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 is 50 kmpl. In technical specifications, Honda XBlade is powered by 162.71 cc engine where as Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 is powered by 149 cc engine. Honda XBlade is available in 1 different colours while Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 comes with 1 colours. 54% users have chosen Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 over Honda XBlade in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Honda XBlade vs Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Engine
| Engine Type | Air Cooled, 4 Stroke, SI Engine | Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 162.71 cc | 149 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 14.12 PS @ 8500 rpm | 13.2 PS @ 8000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 13.9 Nm @ 6000 rpm | 12.8 Nm @ 6000 rpm |
| Bore | 57.3 mm | 57.3 mm |
| Stroke | 63.096 mm | 57.9 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel System | ||
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | Transistor controlled ignition | |
| Compression Ratio | 10:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Engine Immobilizer | ||
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 5 Speed | 5 Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Drum | Disc |
| Braking Type |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 5.3s | 5.97s |
| Quarter Mile | 19.32 s @ 108.33 kmph | 20.35 sec @ 100.37 kmph |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | 25.62m | 20.48 mm |
| 20-80 kmph (kickdown) | ||
| 30-70 kmph (3rd gear) | ||
| 40-80 kmph (4th gear) | ||
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | 45.52m | 36.44 mm |
| Braking (100-0 kmph) | ||
| Mileage (City) | 49.31 kmpl | |
| Mileage (Highway) | 55.42 kmpl | |
| Mileage (Overall) | ||
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 50 kmpl | |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | 17.79s | 20.10s |
| Top Speed (Km/h) | ||
| 0-160 kmph | ||
| Braking 60-0 km/h | 25.62m | 20.48 mm |
Suspension
| Chassis Type | ||
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic | Telescopic |
| Chassis | Diamond | Diamond |
| Suspension-Rear | Monoshock | Swingram |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-80/100-17, Rear :- 130/70-17 | Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/60-R17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch | Front :-17 inch Rear :-17 inch |
| Tyre Make | ||
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | Yes | Yes |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 46 psi | 28 psi |
| Optimum Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion) |
Dimensions
| Dry Weight | ||
| Length*Width*Height | 2013*786*1115 | 1990*780*1080 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1347 mm | 1330 mm |
| Length | 2013 mm | 1990 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 160 mm | 165 mm |
| Height | 1115 mm | 1080 mm |
| Seat Height | 790 mm | |
| Width | 786 mm | 780 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 12 L | 12.8 L |
| Kerb Weight | ||
| Total Weight | ||
| Tail Light | LED | Bulb |
| Front Brake Diameter | 276 mm | |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 130 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | MF | Maintenance Free |
| Charging Time | ||
| Motor Type | ||
| Motor Power | ||
| Fast Charging | ||
| Battery | ||
| Range | ||
| Head Lamp | ||
| Projector head light | ||
| Pilot Lamps | ||
| LED tail lights | ||
| Seat Opening Switch | ||
| Boot Light | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | LED | Bulb |
| Alternator | ||
| Power Modes |
Features
| Cruise Control | ||
| ABS | no | Single Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Naked Bikes | Sports Naked Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ||
| Starting | Kick and Self Start | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Single | Single |
| Pass Switch | Yes | Yes |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Handle Type | ||
| Tachometer | ||
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Charging point | ||
| Average Fuel economy | ||
| Digital Fuel Indicator | ||
| Distance to Empty | ||
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | Yes | Yes |
| External Fuel Filling | ||
| Clock | Digital | |
| Stand Alarm | ||
| Low Battery Indicator | ||
| Stepup Seat | ||
| Low Oil Indicator | Yes | |
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Projector Headlights | ||
| Passenger Backrest | ||
| Carry hook | ||
| Underseat storage | ||
| Cooling System | Air Cooled | Air Cooled |
| Console | Digital | Digital |
| Anti Theft Alarm | ||
| Shutter Lock | ||
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
| Central Locking | ||
| Navigation | ||
| Mobile Connectivity | ||
| EBS | ||
| Service Due Indicator | ||
| Switchable ABS | ||
| DRLs | ||
| Keyless Ignition |
Warranty
| Standard Warranty (Years) | 2 | |
| Standard Warranty (kilometers) | 30000 |
Also Read Comparison Reviews of :
Similar Bike Comparisons
-
FZ-S Fi Version 3.0Rs. 98,680vsFZ-S Fi Version 3.0 vs Apache RTR 160 4VApache RTR 160 4VRs. 92,306
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which is best for ride, Honda Xblade ABS or Yamaha FZ S FI V 3.0?
- FZS V3 is hybrid fuel injection model.It use carburator as well as fuel injection system so it is power plus commutor combination.It is good to use on smooth highways just like city environment.X-blade have carburator system so it is always an excitement with throttle wherever you go.It do not lose momentum even on high gear and low speed because of carburator.FZS need to shift down on sudden speed drop so it lacks the excitement as it take a little time to recover the momentum on same gear.So, I prefer X-blade if you dont think much on pocket,and FZS if you have fix route of travelling comfirtable on pocket too.
- The ARAI claimed mileage of Honda X blade is of 50-55 kmpl. However, it may vary depending on the factors like road conditions and the riding pattern. Talking about the performance of the bike still stays strong to its commuter roots, feels quick enough, and at the same time, looks properly head-turning. Read More: Honda X-Blade: Road Test Review https://www.zigwheels.com/reviews-advice/reviews/honda-xblade-road-test-review/30180/
- Prefer X blade... instead going for Yamaha The fuel injection has been tweaked to offer better midrange but the peak power output remains the same at 13bhp and 12.8Nm.The only difference between the FZ and FZ-S is the presence of a belly pan on the latter. It bumps up the price of the bike by Rs 2000, ex-showroom.
Q. Which one is the best xblade or hornet
- The Honda X-Blade shares its motor with the Hornet 160R. But the 162.71cc, air-cooled, single-cylinder engine puts out 14PS of power at 8500rpm and 13.9Nm of torque at 6000rpm, which is 1.5PS and 1Nm less than the Hornet 160R. The motor is mated to a 5-speed gearbox. The X-Blade looks a lot more appealing than the Hornet and the Unicorn 160. The only miss here then is the lack of any kind of braking aids. The stopping power on the bike, though, feels lacking. The brakes have decent bite but desperately lack feel. The CB Hornet 160R is for the discerning rider who is looking for a sporty and premium 160cc motorcycle that offers looks, more performance and better safety, thanks to the optional ABS. On the other hand, young riders who are under a strict budget may find the X-Blade alluring, thanks to the touring-friendly ergonomics and an aggressive design language. Read more: Honda CB Unicorn 160 vs X-Blade vs CB Hornet 160R: What To Choose?- https://bit.ly/2L4dzuk
- The Honda X-Blade shares its motor with the Hornet 160R. But the 162.71cc, air-cooled, single-cylinder engine puts out 14PS of power at 8500rpm and 13.9Nm of torque at 6000rpm, which is 1.5PS and 1Nm less than the Hornet 160R. The motor is mated to a 5-speed gearbox. The X-Blade looks a lot more appealing than the Hornet and the Unicorn 160. The only miss here then is the lack of any kind of braking aids. The stopping power on the bike, though, feels lacking. The brakes have decent bite but desperately lack feel. The CB Hornet 160R is for the discerning rider who is looking for a sporty and premium 160cc motorcycle that offers looks, more performance and better safety, thanks to the optional ABS. On the other hand, young riders who are under a strict budget may find the X-Blade alluring, thanks to the touring-friendly ergonomics and an aggressive design language. Read more: Honda CB Unicorn 160 vs X-Blade vs CB Hornet 160R: What To Choose?- https://bit.ly/2L4dzuk
- I have driven Trigger previously. I have driven Pulsar 180 also. Now, I own Honda XBlade. But both of Honda bikes.... I felt that these are ordinary bikes behind the garb of Honda. I would prefer Pulsar 180 bike most on point of power...pickup if selected out of these three bikes. But Pulsar 180 bike had one drawbacks like its handle felt heavy on drivers' shoulders.
Q. Which is best Apache RTR 160 4V or fZ S FI V3?
- For TVS Apache 160 4V>> Yes it is true that disc brake is making sound and even when i contacted the service center for sound issue they told me that it can not be completely removed because the sound is caused by the dust between brake pads and brake discs, so minor brake sound in normal even i haven't seen any bike which do not have brake noise.>> In lighting matter i do not found any issue in that , in spite i found its lighting more sporty than any bike of this 160cc segment.>>Exchust sound choice is also not that creepy,however for that you should take test ride check it byh your self.
- Bro performance ofcourse yamaha and for racer type rider apache but it have many problems 😰 buy yamaha kam se kam itni problem toh dekhni nhi pdegi. buy default apache k carb m or engine k beech ek rubber m problem hai sbhi bike m toh 2018 model m woh change kr rhe hain. One way clutch ki bhi bohot problem hai. jab apki bike new hogi toh sound mast lgega but after some months engine ki taraf se sound tejj ho jayega jiska ilaaz h hi nhi. Gear problem also. And the most problem I'm having that ki iske har month Tapits m dikkat aa rhi hai.
- If you want more power than obviously Apache RTR 160 4V will be the good choice or if anyone want comfortable Ride Refined Engine better mileage and bigger look than yamaha Fzs v3 will be a good choice
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
