Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z Price starts at Rs. 1.83 Lakh which is Rs. 45,325 costlier than base model of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 priced at Rs. 1.38 Lakh. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z is powered by 349.13 cc engine , while Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is powered by 349 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z is available in 4 different colours while Royal Enfield Hunter 350 comes with 10 colours. The Comparison Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Pulsar NS400Z vs Hunter 350

Key Highlights Pulsar NS400Z STDHunter 350 Base
Engine Type Liquid Cooled, 4V, DOHC With Four Stroke Single Cylinder Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled
Max Power 40.6 PS @ 9000 rpm 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm

Pulsar NS400Z vs Hunter 350 Key Highlights

Basic Info Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z STDRoyal Enfield Hunter 350 Base
Rating
1 review
855 reviews
Brand Name Bajaj Royal Enfield
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.83 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 1.38 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type Liquid Cooled, 4V, DOHC With Four Stroke Single Cylinder Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled
Max Power 40.6 PS @ 9000 rpm 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
Braking Type ... Anti-lock Braking System
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-17 Inch,Rear :-17 Inch
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Spoke
ABS Dual Channel Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Analogue
EMI
Rs. 5,469 @ 11.99% (36 months)
Rs. 3,965 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 13,659 Pulsar NS400Z Insurance Rs. 11,005 Hunter 350 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Spark Plugs
...
1 Per Cylinder
Valves (per cylinder)
4
2
Claimed Top Speed
...
114 kmph
Emission Norm Compliance
BS6.2
BS6.2
Flex Fuel Blend
E20
E20
Engine Type
Liquid Cooled, 4V, DOHC With Four Stroke Single Cylinder
Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled
Engine Displacement
349.13 cc
349 cc
Gear Box
6 Speed
5 Speed
Max Power
40.6 PS @ 9000 rpm
20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Max Torque
33.2 Nm @ 7500 rpm
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Bore
...
72 mm
Stroke
...
85.8 mm
Number Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Fuel System
Fuel Injection
Electronic Injection
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
...
Electronic Fuel Injection
Compression Ratio
...
9.5 : 1

Front Brake
Disc
Disc
Rear Brake
Disc
Drum
Front Caliper
...
2 Piston
Rear Caliper
...
1 Piston
Braking Type
...
Anti-lock Braking System

Mileage (Overall)
...
36.2 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
...
16.40s
Braking 60-0 km/h
...
18.13m

Rear Suspension Preload Adjustment
...
Rear Suspension Travel / Wheel Travel
...
100 mm
Suspension-Front
43 mm Upside Down Fork
Telescopic, 41mm forks
Suspension-Rear
Monoshock With Nitrox, 6 Step Adjustable
Twin shock absorbers with 6-step adjustable preload

Front Tyre Pressure (Rider)
...
29 psi
Front Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
...
29 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider)
...
32 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
...
33 psi
Brake Fluid Grade
...
DOT4
Tyre Size
Front :-110/70-17 Rear :-150/60-17
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-17 Inch,Rear :-17 Inch
Tyre Make
Apollo
CEAT
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tube
Radial Tyre
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Spoke

Seat height
...
790 mm
Load carrying capacity
...
179 kg
Fuel Tank Reserve Capacity
...
2.6 L
Gross Weight
...
360 kg
Engine Oil Capacity
...
2.2 L
Engine Oil Grade
...
SAE 15W 50 API SL grade JASO MA2 semi synthetic
Length*Width*Height
...
2055*810*1070 mm3
Wheelbase
1346 mm
1370 mm
Length
...
2055 mm
Ground Clearance
165 mm
160 mm
Height
...
1070 mm
Width
...
810 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity
12 L
13 L
Kerb Weight
176 Kg
177 Kg
Tail Light
LED
Bulb
Front Brake Size
320 mm
300 mm
Rear Brake Size
230 mm
153 mm

Battery Type
...
Lead Acid
Call/SMS Alerts
...
Roadside assistance
...
Optional
USB charging port
Type C
Music control
...
Headlight
LED
Halogen
Battery Capacity
...
12V / 8AH
Projector head light
LED Projector
...

Frame Type
...
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
Digital Display Type
LCD
LCD
Malfunction Indicator
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Pillion Seat
Pillion Grab Rail
Calls and Messaging
...
Navigation assist
...
Riding Modes
Rain,Road,Off-Road,Sports
Traction Control
...
Low battery alert
...
Brightness Control
...
No. of Tripmeters
3
3
Rear Footpegs
Multi-function Lock
...
Daytime Running Lamps
...
Additional Features/Information
...
Wet sump, forced lubrication, Paper element Air Cleaner
Gear Position Indicator
...
Average Fuel Economy Indicator
...
ABS Type
Dual Channel
Single Channel
Distance To Empty
...
Side Stand Warning
Physical Key
...
Exhaust Heat Shield
Front Footpegs
...
Forward-set
Body
...
Metal
Instrument Cluster Control Switchcube
...
Handlebar type
Hydroformed Tubular Street Fighter Style
...
ABS
Dual Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Sports Naked Bikes
Roadster Bikes
Body Graphics
...
Instrument Console Type
Digital
Analogue and Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
Bluetooth
...
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Single
Pass Beam Switch
Speedometer
Digital
Analogue
Tachometer
Digital
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
...
Low Oil Indicator
...
Cooling System
Liquid Cooled
Air & Oil Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
...
Service Due Indicator
Switchable ABS
...

Vehicle Warranty
...
3 Years or 30,000 Km
4th Service
...
15000 Km / 18 Months
Standard Warranty (Years)
...
3
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
...
30000

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z
  • Is priced quite well
  • Makes a decent amount of power
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • Offering easy accessibility
Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z
  • Build quality could’ve been better
  • Stiff rear suspension
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well
  • Absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity

Is Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z Better Than Royal Enfield Hunter 350?

100% users have chosen Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z over Royal Enfield Hunter 350 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 1329 users have also rated Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z and Royal Enfield Hunter 350 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for performance and safety in your bike. But Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is better on the grounds of mileage, comfort and maintenance.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Pulsar NS400Z Hunter 350
Mileage 3.0 3.9
Performance 5.0 4.4
Comfort 4.0 4.5
Maintenance 3.0 3.8
Safety 3.0 0.2
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Review and Win Banner

Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z Comparison with Similar Bikes

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z and Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.
|Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z Community

Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z Vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 FAQs

Which bike is best between Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
As per the users experiences Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for performance and safety in your bike. But Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is better on the grounds of mileage, comfort and maintenance.
Which bike is cheaper Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is cheaper than Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z by ₹45,325.
Which bike offers better performance Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
For the STD version, 349.13 cc Petrol engine of Pulsar NS400Z produces 40.6 PS @ 9000 rpm of power and 33.2 Nm @ 7500 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Base version, 349 cc Petrol engine of Hunter 350 produces 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z has better performance.

Images of Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z and Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Which one do you like more?
Pulsar NS400Z
Pulsar NS400Z
Hunter 350
Hunter 350
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350
×