Bajaj Pulsar 150 vs Bajaj Pulsar 180F Comparison
Bajaj Pulsar 150 vs Bajaj Pulsar 180F
Bajaj Pulsar 180F Price starts at Rs. 96,390 which is Rs. 21,190 costlier than Bajaj Pulsar 150 priced at Rs. 75,200. The claimed mileage for the Bajaj Pulsar 150 is 65 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for Bajaj Pulsar 180F is 47.9 kmpl. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar 150 is powered by 149.5 cc engine where as Bajaj Pulsar 180F is powered by 178.6 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar 150 is available in 7 different colours while Bajaj Pulsar 180F comes with 1 colours. 58% users have chosen Bajaj Pulsar 180F over Bajaj Pulsar 150 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Bajaj Pulsar 150 vs Bajaj Pulsar 180F on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Engine
| Engine Type | 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, Twin Spark, Air Cooled, BSIV Compliant DTS-i Engine | 4 - stroke, SOHC 4-Valve, Air Cooled, DTS-i |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 149.5 cc | 178.6 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 14 PS @ 8000 rpm | 17.02 PS @ 8500 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | ||
| Bore | ||
| Stroke | ||
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel System | ||
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | Twin Spark | |
| Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | |
| Engine Immobilizer | ||
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 5 Speed | 5 Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Drum | Disc |
| Braking Type |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 5.6s | 5.54s |
| Quarter Mile | 19.56 sec @ 106.04 kmph | |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | 20.19 m, 2.94 secm | |
| 20-80 kmph (kickdown) | ||
| 30-70 kmph (3rd gear) | ||
| 40-80 kmph (4th gear) | ||
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | 37.42 m, 3.58 secm | |
| Braking (100-0 kmph) | 59.26 m, 4.70 secm | |
| Mileage (City) | 47.86 kmpl | |
| Mileage (Highway) | 48.95 kmpl | |
| Mileage (Overall) | ||
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 65 kmpl | |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | 15.88s | |
| Top Speed (Km/h) | ||
| 0-160 kmph | ||
| Braking 60-0 km/h | 20.19 m, 2.94 secm |
Suspension
| Chassis Type | ||
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic with Anti Friction Bush | Telescopic with Anti Friction Bush |
| Chassis | ||
| Suspension-Rear | 5 Way Adjustable Nitrox Shock Absorber | 5 Way Adjustable, Nitrox Shock Absorber |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-80/100-17, Rear :-100/90-17 | Front :-80/100-17, Rear :-110/80-17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch | Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch |
| Tyre Make | ||
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | Yes | Yes |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 25 psi | 28 psi |
| Optimum Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion) |
Dimensions
| Dry Weight | ||
| Length*Width*Height | 2055*755*1060 | 2035*765*1115 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1320 mm | 1345 mm |
| Length | 2055 mm | 2035 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 165 mm | 165 mm |
| Height | 1060 mm | 1115 mm |
| Seat Height | 785 mm | 790 mm |
| Width | 755 mm | 765 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 15 L | 15 L |
| Kerb Weight | ||
| Total Weight | ||
| Tail Light | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 240 mm | 260 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 130 mm | 230 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | DC | DC MF |
| Charging Time | ||
| Motor Type | ||
| Motor Power | ||
| Fast Charging | ||
| Battery | ||
| Range | ||
| Head Lamp | ||
| Projector head light | ||
| Pilot Lamps | ||
| LED tail lights | ||
| Seat Opening Switch | ||
| Boot Light | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | Bulb | Bulb |
| Alternator | ||
| Power Modes |
Features
| Cruise Control | ||
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel |
| Body Type | Commuter Bikes | Sports Naked Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ||
| Starting | Kick and Self Start | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Single | Split |
| Pass Switch | Yes | Yes |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Handle Type | ||
| Tachometer | Analogue | Analogue |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Charging point | ||
| Average Fuel economy | ||
| Digital Fuel Indicator | ||
| Distance to Empty | ||
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | Yes | Yes |
| External Fuel Filling | ||
| Clock | ||
| Stand Alarm | ||
| Low Battery Indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Stepup Seat | ||
| Low Oil Indicator | ||
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Projector Headlights | ||
| Passenger Backrest | ||
| Carry hook | ||
| Underseat storage | ||
| Cooling System | Air Cooled | Air Cooled |
| Console | Analogue and Digital | Analogue and Digital |
| Anti Theft Alarm | ||
| Shutter Lock | ||
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
| Central Locking | ||
| Navigation | ||
| Mobile Connectivity | No | No |
| EBS | ||
| Service Due Indicator | ||
| Switchable ABS | ||
| DRLs | ||
| Keyless Ignition |
Warranty
| Standard Warranty (Years) | 2 | 2 |
| Standard Warranty (kilometers) | 30000 | 30000 |
Also Read Comparison Reviews of :
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Why there is a difference of 20k for STD 150 and Twin disc 150 - Pulsar 150?
- Because the fit and finish is better than the neon version in the twin disc variant and you get a wider tyre and the twin disc offers better breaking. But end of the day all the variants are more or less the same.
- There will be few dimension changes and seat comfort, front flaps, rear disc, tire size will be added.
- Because of styling,finishing and twin discs with abs,also feel much sporty then previous versions
Q. Which bike is safer in terms of disc brakes. Pulsar 150 twin disc or single disc?
- If you're familiar with bikes twin disc would be good. If you're relatively new to riding single disc would do the job.
- Pulsar 150 Twin Disc
- Pulsar 150 twin disc
Q. Which is better either Pulsar 180 F or Hornet 160 R?
- Pulsar 180 f
- Pulsar 180f
- Pulsar180f