Q. Which RTR is better in the following aspects mileage, sporty looking, performance and other necessary elements RTR 200 4v or RTR 160 4v?

Both looks identical, with differences like 200 Race edition graphics, no kick start in 200, but almost 40cc more than its younger sibling, which means a little lower milage but more power and pickup. I think after owning 160-4v and later ridden 200 the latter is better option if u r looking for what u asked in your question.

Bro i am going to buy 200 4v but i caught up with 160 4v as no difference between the only of little imp in cc's and mileage also decreases as compared to 160 4v

Design is almost same. Both the bikes are powerful.Having 40cc more will not make a great difference. If you want to have mileage into consideration , definitely you should buy 160 4v. I did not had the budget for 200 4v. But I am very happy with 160 4v as well

See if you can spend that much money go for rtr 2004v race edition 2.0..but 160 4v beats 200 4v if you are concerned about milage

Rtr 160 4V has better mileage than 200 4v. Rtr 160 4v-40kmpl city and 44kmpl in highway.Rtr 200 4v-33kmpl city and 36kmpl highway.

Of course 160 4v. U will get around 45 kmpl in 160 as compared to 36 kmpl in 200 4v.

RTR 1604V IS BETTER IN MILLAGE, BUT LAC IN POWER THAN 2004V.

Ofcourse 160 4v as it has less cc than rtr 200

Of course 160 'll give u better mileage