TVS Scooty Zest vs Yamaha Fascino Comparison
TVS Scooty Zest vs Yamaha Fascino
Yamaha Fascino Price starts at Rs. 56,023 which is Rs. 4,498 costlier than TVS Scooty Zest priced at Rs. 51,525. The claimed mileage for the TVS Scooty Zest is 62 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for Yamaha Fascino is 66 kmpl. In technical specifications, TVS Scooty Zest is powered by 109.7 cc engine where as Yamaha Fascino is powered by 113 cc engine. TVS Scooty Zest is available in 7 different colours while Yamaha Fascino comes with 8 colours. 63% users have chosen Yamaha Fascino over TVS Scooty Zest in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare TVS Scooty Zest vs Yamaha Fascino on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Scooty Zest vs Fascino Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | Scooty Zest 110 Matte Series | Fascino Darknight Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Rs. 51,525 | Rs. 57,523 |
| Engine Type | Single-Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air-Cooled Spark Ignition System | Air-cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 109.7 cc | 113 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 7.99 PS @ 7500 rpm | 7.2 PS @ 7500 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Brakes Front | Drum | Drum |
| Brakes Rear | Drum | Drum |
| Braking Type | Synchronized Braking System | Unified Braking System |
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 11.1s | ... |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 62 kmpl | 66 kmpl |
| Wheel Size | Front :-254 mm,Rear :-254 mm | Front :-254 mm,Rear :-254 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| ABS | no | no |
| Starting | Kick and Self Start | Kick and Self Start |
| Speedometer | Analogue | Analogue |
Engine
| Engine Type | Single-Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air-Cooled Spark Ignition System | Air-cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 109.7 cc | 113 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 7.99 PS @ 7500 rpm | 7.2 PS @ 7500 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 8.4 Nm @ 5500 rpm | 8.1 Nm @ 5000 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs4 | bs4 |
| Bore | ... | 50 mm |
| Stroke | ... | 57.8 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Belt Drive | Belt Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | Digital IDI Ignition | C.D.I (Capacitor Discharge Ignition) |
| Compression Ratio | ... | 9.2:1 |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| No Of Gears | CVT | CVT |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Drum | Drum |
| Brakes Rear | Drum | Drum |
| Braking Type | Synchronized Braking System | Unified Braking System |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 11.1s | ... |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 62 kmpl | 66 kmpl |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic | Telescopic |
| Chassis | ... | Underbone |
| Suspension-Rear | Double rated Hydraulic Mono Shock | Unit Swing |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-90/100-10, Rear :-90/90-10 | Front :-90/100-10 Rear :-90/100-10 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-254 mm,Rear :-254 mm | Front :-254 mm,Rear :-254 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | ||
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 24 psi | 22 psi |
Dimensions
| Length*Width*Height | 1770*660*1139 | 1820*675*1120 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1250 mm | 1270 mm |
| Length | 1770 mm | 1820 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | ... | 130 mm |
| Height | 1139 mm | 1120 mm |
| Seat Height | 760 mm | 775 mm |
| Width | 660 mm | 675 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 5 L | 5.2 L |
| Tail Light | LED | Bulb |
| Front Brake Diameter | 110 mm | ... |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 130 mm | ... |
Electricals
| Battery Type | Lead Acid | Maintenance Free |
| Pilot Lamps | ... | |
| LED tail lights | ... | |
| Boot Light | ... | |
| Turn Signal Lamp | Bulb | Bulb |
Features
| ABS | no | no |
| Body Graphics | ||
| Starting | Kick and Self Start | Kick and Self Start |
| Seat Type | Single | Single |
| Pass Switch | ||
| Speedometer | Analogue | Analogue |
| Trip Meter | ... | Analogue |
| Charging point | ... | |
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | ||
| Stepup Seat | ... | With Long Seat |
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Carry hook | ... | |
| Underseat storage | 21 L | |
| Cooling System | Air Cooled | Air Cooled |
| Console | Analogue | Analogue |
| Odometer | Analogue | Analogue |
| Mobile Connectivity | ... | |
| DRLs | ... |
Warranty
| Standard Warranty (Years) | 5 | ... |
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which is better Yamaha Fascino or Honda Activa 5G?
- If we talk about the power figures, Activa 5G(8.11 PS/9 Nm) has an upper hand while Fascino(7.1 PS /8.1 Nm) delivers better-claimed mileage of 66kmpl which is 6 kmpl more than Activa 5G. Though Activa gives better riding comfort, Fascino has better handling and balance due to low ground clearance.The Yamaha Fascino is the most fuel efficient scooter in the market with a claimed mileage of 66kmpl. With its retro-modern design language, the Fascino is targeted at consumers who want a stylish scooter to stand apart from the crowd. While Activa got an upgrade to LED headlights and the semi-digital console. it is crucial towards strengthening the Activa’s position in the Indian two-wheeler market further. That said, we are certain that the Activa brand will continue to maintain its position as the best-selling scooter in India, owing to the name it has made for itself over the past decade.We would suggest you to take a test ride in order to clear all your doubts. Moreover, to churn details regarding the dealership nearest to your city check the following link: https://www.zigwheels.com/bikes/dealers
- If we talk about the power figures, Activa 5G(8.11 PS/9 Nm) has a upper hand while, Fascino(7.1 PS /8.1 Nm) delivers better claimed mileage of 66kmpl which is 6 kmpl more than Activa 5G. Though Activa gives better riding comfort, fascino has better handling and balance due to low ground clearance. The Yamaha Fascino is the most fuel efficienct scooter in the market with a claimed mileage of 66kmpl. With its retro-modern design language the Fascino is targeted at consumers who want a stylish scooter to stand apart from the crowd. While, Activa got upgrade to LED headlights and the semi-digital console. it is crucial towards strengthening the Activa’s position in the Indian two-wheeler market further. That said, we are certain that the Activa brand will continue to maintain its position as the best-selling scooter in India, owing to the name it has made for itself over the past decade. We would suggest you to take a test ride in order to clear your all doubts. Click on the given link to get your nearest dealership details: https://bit.ly/2jv2aXQ
- Best is to go with N-torq in the similar price range. My family is loyal to Honda so we have Grazia, Activa, Aviator. Now, i use these 2 vehicles on regular basis - Duke 390 and N-torq. SR150 which my brother uses. To be honest... I think SR150 is best but it is highly overpriced... Now lets come to the price section where activa belongs... So, after riding its all siblings... The best one is N-torq which is a TVS brand. I was a Honda loyal customer just like my family but N-torq is way better in every aspect so i had to move to N-torq. I would advice you the same to go with N-torq. It is the best choice.. You better take a test ride of all the three vehicles then purchase which one you feel best comfortable with....
Q. Which is better between Dio and Fascino?
- Fascino has good balancing. You can drive it like a sports bike by leaning. Except that, no advanced features available...
- Okay nice question both are lightweight scooters in the market right, now difference is here dio has 1 hp mote than facsino and build quality of dio is lot better than facsino
- Fascino is a basic vehicle but with some good pros.
Q. Which is better, Jupiter or Fascino?
- I don't like TVS vehicles, service is not up to the standard in most of the service centers
- Jupiter is best in terms of feature and ride quality.
- Fascino Yamaha had good engine
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
