TVS iQube ST vs TVS Orbiter
Last Updated: August 27, 2026
TVS Orbiter price starts at Rs. 95,550, which is Rs. 80,729 cheaper than the base variant of TVS iQube ST, priced at Rs. 1.76 Lakh. In terms of range, the iQube ST offers a claimed 212 km/charge, while the Orbiter delivers 86 km/charge. On the performance front, the iQube ST uses a 5.3 Kwh battery and the Orbiter a 1.8 Kwh battery. If you're deciding between the iQube ST and Orbiter, the Orbiter is the better pick for affordability and a lighter kerb weight, while the iQube ST stands out for range.
...Read More
iQube ST vs Orbiter Comparison Summary
| Specification | TVS iQube ST | TVS Orbiter |
|---|---|---|
| Ex-showroom price (base) | Rs. 1.76 Lakh | Rs. 95,550 |
| Range | 212 km/charge | 86 km/charge |
| Battery capacity | 5.3 Kwh | 1.8 Kwh |
| Kerb weight | 128.8 Kg | 101 Kg |
iQube ST vs Orbiter Key Highlights
| Basic Info | TVS iQube ST 5.3 kWh | TVS Orbiter V1 |
|---|---|---|
| Rating |
12 reviews
|
1 review |
| Brand Name | TVS | TVS |
| Ex-Showroom Price | Rs. 1.76 Lakh Check On Road Price | Rs. 95,550 Check On Road Price |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Electric |
| Colors | ||
| Braking Type | Not Available | Synchronized Braking System |
| Wheel Size | Front :-304.8 mm,Rear :-304.8 mm | Front :-355.6 mm,Rear :-304.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| Range | 212 km/charge | 86 km/charge |
| Starting | Push Button Start | Push Button Start |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Insurance | Rs. 7,768 iQube ST Insurance | Rs. 5,199 Orbiter Insurance |
| Brochure |
Download
Brochure
|
Download
Brochure
|
Electric Motor |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brakes |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Suspension |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tyres |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dimensions |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electricals |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Features |
|
Pros and Cons
- Positives
- Negatives
- Gets a powerful 4.4kW motor which ensures great performance
- The 5.3kWh battery pack version gets a claimed range of 212km
- Gets a solid build quality
- Comes with a big 32-litre underseat storage
- Looks quite modern
- Comes with cruise control
- Has a large 14-inch front wheel
- Doesn't get a full fledged Google Maps based navigation system like some of its rivals
- The price is a bit on the higher side
- Lacks a disc brake at the front
- Top speed could’ve been slightly higher
Is TVS IQube ST Better Than TVS Orbiter?
50% users have chosen TVS iQube ST over TVS Orbiter in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 20 users have also rated TVS iQube ST and TVS Orbiter on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
TVS Orbiter has out rated TVS iQube ST on all the rating factors.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..
| Ratings Factor | Orbiter | iQube ST |
|---|---|---|
| Mileage | 4.3 | 5.0 |
| Performance | 4.3 | 5.0 |
| Comfort | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Maintenance | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Features | 3.2 | 5.0 |
Videos of TVS iQube ST and TVS Orbiter
- 2025 Suzuki Access vs TVS Jupiter vs TVS iQube ST - Practicality & Performance Comparison 3 Apr, 2025 17248 views 13:05
- TVS Orbiter vs Bajaj Chetak C2501: REAL Range Test! Battery Dead Winner? 🔋 10 Aug, 2026 3031 views 19:31
-
TVS iQube ST Comparison with Similar Bikes
Latest News on TVS iQube ST and TVS Orbiter
-
TVS Hikes Two-Wheeler Prices Up to Rs 10,400; Ntorq 125 Cuts Up to Rs 1,65030 Jul, 2026 | By Team ZigWheels -
TVS Orbiter V1: Booking Details22 Mar, 2026 | By Team ZigWheels
TVS iQube ST Vs TVS Orbiter FAQs
Images of TVS Orbiter and TVS iQube ST
- Home ›
- New Bikes ›
- Compare Bikes ›
- TVS iQube ST vs TVS Orbiter









