Ather Rizta vs TVS iQube ST

TVS iQube ST Price starts at Rs. 1.46 Lakh which is Rs. 69,647 costlier than base model of Ather Rizta priced at Rs. 75,999. In technical specifications, . Ather Rizta is available in 9 different colours while TVS iQube ST comes with 3 colours. The Comparison Ather Rizta vs TVS iQube ST can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Rizta vs iQube ST

Key Highlights Rizta S (IDC 123 Km) MonoiQube ST 5.3 kWh
Range 123 km/charge 212 km/charge
Charging Time 5.45 Hr ...

Rizta vs iQube ST Key Highlights

Basic Info Ather Rizta S (IDC 123 Km) MonoTVS iQube ST 5.3 kWh
Rating
42 reviews
11 reviews
Brand Name Ather TVS
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.18 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 1.73 Lakh Check On Road Price
Fuel Type Electric Electric
Colors
Ather Energy Rizta Colors
TVS iQube ST Colors
Braking Type Combi Brake System ...
Wheel Size Front :-304 mm,Rear :-304 mm Front :-304.8 mm,Rear :-304.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
Range 123 km/charge 212 km/charge
Charging Time 5.45 Hr ...
Starting Push Button Start Push Button Start
Speedometer Digital Digital
Insurance Rs. 6,859 Rizta Insurance Rs. 7,707 iQube ST Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Claimed Top Speed
80 km/Hr
82 km/Hr
Wheel Torque
...
140 Nm
Motor Torque
22 Nm
33 Nm
Motor Waterproofing Rating
IP67
IP67
Dedicated Charger Compartment
...
Charger Warranty
3
...
No. Of Batteries
1
1
Continuous Power
...
3 kW
Drive Type
Belt Drive
Hub Motor
Battery Warranty
3 Years or 30,000 Km
...
Fuel Type
Electric
Electric

Front Brake
Disc
Disc
Rear Brake
Drum
Drum
Braking Type
Combi Brake System
...

0-40 Kmph (sec)
4.7s
4.5s

Suspension-Front
Telescopic
Telescopic
Suspension-Rear
Monoshock
Hydraulic Twin Tube Shock Absorber

Tyre Size
Front :-: 90/90-12, Rear :-100/80-12
Front :-90/90-12 Rear :-90/90-12
Wheel Size
Front :-304 mm,Rear :-304 mm
Front :-304.8 mm,Rear :-304.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy

Seat height
780 mm
770 mm
Length*Width*Height
1850*750*1140 mm3
1805*645*1140 mm3
Wheelbase
1285 mm
1301 mm
Length
1850 mm
1805 mm
Ground Clearance
150 mm
157 mm
Height
1140 mm
1140 mm
Width
750 mm
645 mm
Kerb Weight
125 Kg
128.8 Kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Front Brake Size
200 mm
220 mm
Rear Brake Size
130 mm
130 mm

Battery Type
Li-ion
Li-ion
Motor Type
PMSM
BLDC
Motor Power
4.3 kW
4.4 kW
Claimed range
123 km/charge
212 km/charge
Charging network / Battery swapping network
Call/SMS Alerts
Regenerative braking
...
Roadside assistance
...
Anti-theft alert
USB charging port
Music control
Conventional Charging Time
5 Hours 45 Minutes
...
Range
123 km/charge
212 km/charge
Headlight
LED
LED
Charging at Home
Battery Capacity
2.9 Kwh
5.3 Kwh
Charging Time
5.45 Hr
...
Charging Time(0-80%)
6 Hrs 30 Min
4 Hrs 30 Min
Seat Opening Switch

Frame Type
...
Tubular Structure
Digital Display Type
DeepView
TFT
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Vehicle Location Tracking
Pillion Seat
Pillion Grab Rail
...
Calls and Messaging
Navigation assist
Riding Modes
Eco,Power
Low battery alert
Brightness Control
Rear Footpegs
OTA Updates
Multi-function Lock
Daytime Running Lamps
Additional Features/Information
Riding Modes - Default | Eco | SmartEco, Side Stand Motor Cut-Off, 400 mm Water Wading Limit, Auto Hold, Auto Indicator Cut-Off, Guide-Me-Home Lights, FallSafe, Emergency Stop Signal (Dashboard - 8GB Storage, 1 GB RAM, 4G LTE, GNSS with AGPS), (Ather Connect - Tow Notifications, Find My Scooter, Ride Stories, Push Navigation, Alexa Skills)
BMS Controlled, Offboard Charger, Spike Protection, Portable Charger, Illuminating Logo, 800 x 480 Pixels Resolution, 100 Lux Brightness, Day/Night Mode, GMS Connectivity Via Server, Live Indicator Status, Pleasant Horn Tone, Parking Brake Lever, HMI Joystick, Incognito Mode, TPMS
Voice Assist
...
Distance To Empty
Navigation Type
...
Full Maps Navigation
Side Stand Warning
Front Footpegs
...
Forward-set
Fall Alert
...
Body
...
Fiber
Reverse Assist
Telematics
Touch Screen Display
...
Battery Percentage
...
Body Type
Electric Scooters
Electric Scooters
Instrument Console Type
Digital
Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
Bluetooth
Internet Connectivity
Starting
Push Button Start
Push Button Start
Seat Type
Single
Single
Operating System
Real Time OS
...
Pass Beam Switch
Processor
Cortex Series
...
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Mobile Application
Charging Station Locator
...
Gradeability
15°
10°
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
Passenger Backrest
Carry hook
Underseat storage
34 L
32 L
Geo Fencing
...
Charger Output
350 W
...
Key Shutter Lock
...
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
Service Due Indicator

Vehicle Warranty
3 Years or 30,000 Km
...
Standard Warranty (Years)
3
...
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
30000
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Ather Rizta
  • 34-litres of underseat storage can easily hold a 15-inch laptop bag
  • Massive seat has enough space for even the largest riders and pillions
  • Gets lots of cool features such as Google Maps navigation
  • WhatsApp alerts
  • Skid Control and much more
TVS iQube ST
  • Gets a powerful 4.4kW motor which ensures great performance
  • The 5.3kWh battery pack version gets a claimed range of 212km
  • Gets a solid build quality
  • Comes with a big 32-litre underseat storage
Ather Rizta
  • Smart Eco mode feels a bit underpowered and struggles on inclines
  • Design can seem a bit boring to younger buyers
  • Ride quality could have been more plush
TVS iQube ST
  • Doesn't get a full fledged Google Maps based navigation system like some of its rivals
  • The price is a bit on the higher side

Is TVS IQube ST Better Than Ather Rizta?

53% users have chosen TVS iQube ST over Ather Rizta in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 77 users have also rated TVS iQube ST and Ather Rizta on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences TVS iQube ST is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for maintenance and safety in your bike. But Ather Rizta is better on the grounds of comfort and features. On the basis of mileage and performance user have rated both the bikes equally.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor iQube ST Rizta
Mileage 4.2 4.2
Performance 4.2 4.2
Comfort 4.2 4.8
Maintenance 4.2 4.1
Safety 1.0 0.5
Features 3.2 3.9
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Review and Win Banner

Ather Rizta Comparison with Similar Bikes

TVS iQube ST Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Ather Energy Rizta and TVS iQube ST

Ather Energy Rizta Vs TVS iQube ST FAQs

Which bike is best between Ather Energy Rizta vs TVS iQube ST?
As per the users experiences Ather Rizta is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for comfort and features in your bike. But TVS iQube ST is better on the grounds of maintenance and safety. On the basis of mileage and performance user have rated both the bikes equally.
Which bike is cheaper Ather Energy Rizta vs TVS iQube ST?
The Ather Rizta is cheaper than TVS iQube ST by ₹55,584.
Which bike offers better performance Ather Energy Rizta vs TVS iQube ST?
As per the users experiences in terms of performance both are same.

Images of Ather Rizta and TVS iQube ST

Which one do you like more?
iQube ST
iQube ST
Rizta
Rizta
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Ather Rizta vs TVS iQube ST
×