Suzuki 2019 Gixxer SF vs Yamaha MT 15 Comparison
Suzuki 2019 Gixxer SF vs Yamaha MT 15
Yamaha MT 15 Price starts at Rs. 1.36 lakh which is Rs. 26,130 costlier than Suzuki Gixxer SF priced at Rs. 1.10 lakh. The claimed mileage for the Suzuki Gixxer SF is 51 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for Yamaha MT 15 is 48.6 kmpl. In technical specifications, Suzuki Gixxer SF is powered by 155 cc engine where as Yamaha MT 15 is powered by 155 cc engine. Suzuki Gixxer SF is available in 1 different colours while Yamaha MT 15 comes with 1 colours. 59% users have chosen Yamaha MT-15 over Suzuki Gixxer SF in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Suzuki Gixxer SF vs Yamaha MT 15 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Engine
| Engine Type | 4-Stroke, 1-Cylinder, Air-cooled | Liquid cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 155 cc | 155 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 14.1 PS @ 8000 rpm | 19.3 PS @ 10000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 14 Nm @ 6000 rpm | 14.7 Nm @ 8500 rpm |
| Bore | 56 mm | 58 mm |
| Stroke | 62.9 mm | 58.7 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel System | ||
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | Transistor controlled ignition | |
| Compression Ratio | 11.6:1 | |
| Engine Immobilizer | ||
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 5 Speed | 6-Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
| Braking Type |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 5.21s | 4.21s |
| Quarter Mile | 17.99 s @ 113.74 kmpl | |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | 17.20m | 21.40 m, 3.06 secm |
| 20-80 kmph (kickdown) | ||
| 30-70 kmph (3rd gear) | ||
| 40-80 kmph (4th gear) | ||
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | 34.82m | 38.25 m, 3.92 secm |
| Braking (100-0 kmph) | 63.43 m, 4.92 secm | |
| Mileage (City) | 51 kmpl | 48.58 kmpl |
| Mileage (Highway) | 62.47 kmpl | 52.02 kmph |
| Mileage (Overall) | 48 kmpl | 45 kmpl |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | ||
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | 17.56s | 12.08s |
| Top Speed (Km/h) | ||
| 0-160 kmph | ||
| Braking 60-0 km/h | 17.20m | 21.40 m, 3.06 secm |
Suspension
| Chassis Type | ||
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic, Coil spring, Oil damped | Telescopic Fork |
| Chassis | Delta Box | |
| Suspension-Rear | Swing Arm Type, Mono Suspension | Swingarm |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-140/60-17 | Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/70-17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch | Front :-17 inch Rear :-17 Inch |
| Tyre Make | ||
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | Yes | Yes |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Cast | Alloy |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 29 psi | |
| Optimum Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion) |
Dimensions
| Dry Weight | ||
| Length*Width*Height | 2025*715*1035 | 2020*800*1070 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1340 mm | 1335 mm |
| Length | 2025 mm | 2020 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 165 mm | 155 mm |
| Height | 1035 mm | 1070 mm |
| Seat Height | 795 mm | 810 mm |
| Width | 715 mm | 800 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 12 L | 10 L |
| Kerb Weight | ||
| Total Weight | ||
| Tail Light | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 282 mm | |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 220 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | Maintenance Free | ETZ-5 |
| Charging Time | ||
| Motor Type | ||
| Motor Power | ||
| Fast Charging | ||
| Battery | ||
| Range | ||
| Head Lamp | ||
| Projector head light | ||
| Pilot Lamps | ||
| LED tail lights | ||
| Seat Opening Switch | ||
| Boot Light | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | LED | Bulb |
| Alternator | ||
| Power Modes |
Features
| Cruise Control | ||
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Bikes | Sports Naked Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ||
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Split | Single |
| Pass Switch | Yes | Yes |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Handle Type | ||
| Tachometer | ||
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Charging point | ||
| Average Fuel economy | ||
| Digital Fuel Indicator | ||
| Distance to Empty | ||
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | Yes | Yes |
| External Fuel Filling | ||
| Clock | ||
| Stand Alarm | ||
| Low Battery Indicator | ||
| Stepup Seat | ||
| Low Oil Indicator | Yes | |
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Projector Headlights | ||
| Passenger Backrest | ||
| Carry hook | ||
| Underseat storage | ||
| Cooling System | Air Cooled | Liquid Cooled |
| Console | Digital | Digital |
| Anti Theft Alarm | ||
| Shutter Lock | ||
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
| Central Locking | ||
| Navigation | ||
| Mobile Connectivity | No | |
| EBS | ||
| Service Due Indicator | ||
| Switchable ABS | ||
| DRLs | ||
| Keyless Ignition |
Warranty
| Standard Warranty (Years) | 2 | |
| Standard Warranty (kilometers) | 30000 |
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which is the better option out of Gixxer SF, MT-15 and Apache RTR 200 4V 2.0 ABS? Considering aspects such as maintenance cost, comfort(both rider and pillion), city riding ability, and safety.
- For pillion comfort wise all the bikes are almost same...split seat type,maintenance cost of suzuki is affordable..and city riding ability of suzuki gixxer is also very good and safety depends on the way you ride the bike.....so as i am also owning a Suzuki gixxer, I'll recommend you Suzuki gixxer sf....but I'll recommend yoi to get a test drive of three of the bikes.they all are very good competitors of Suzuki.
- Perfomence and handling is better in my
- RTR 200 ABS
Q. MT-15 or SF 150 which is better?
- Gixxer SF because here you will get power and mileage both
- Undoubtedly Gixxer SF is best
- Sf 150 is better than MT -15
Q. Which is best MT-15 or Duke 125?
- According to your question ,MT 15 is more comfort with a power full engine.duke 125 is not bad ,it has 124 cc engine but it compitating with 150 cc bikes.both are good.
- Well looking at price point I would say duke 125 is worth it but if you are looking for power then definitely go for mt-15 . Even though mt-15 has bigger cc engine it can still provide 50 km mileage .Note : Does not know the mileage capabilities of duke 125.
- First thing both are quite overpriced for what they offer and there are lot other bikes that offer good performance at a better price looks aren't the only thing that matters prefer indian brands they offer better quality and at low cost
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
