Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V

Last Updated: September 29, 2026

TVS Apache RTR 160 4V price starts at Rs. 1.20 Lakh, which is Rs. 17,750 cheaper than the base variant of Royal Enfield Hunter 350, priced at Rs. 1.38 Lakh. In terms of mileage, the Hunter 350 offers a claimed 36.2 kmpl, while the Apache RTR 160 4V delivers 41 kmpl. On the performance front, the Hunter 350 uses a 349cc engine producing 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm and the Apache RTR 160 4V a 159.7cc engine producing 17.55 PS @ 9250 rpm. If you're deciding between the Hunter 350 and Apache RTR 160 4V, the Apache RTR 160 4V is the better pick for affordability and mileage, while the Hunter 350 stands out for performance.

...Read More

Hunter 350 vs Apache RTR 160 4V Comparison Summary

Specification Royal Enfield Hunter 350TVS Apache RTR 160 4V
Ex-showroom price (base) Rs. 1.38 LakhRs. 1.20 Lakh
Mileage 36.2 kmpl41 kmpl
Engine 349 cc159.7 cc
Max power 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm17.55 PS @ 9250 rpm
Kerb weight 177 Kg143 Kg

Hunter 350 vs Apache RTR 160 4V Key Highlights

Basic Info Royal Enfield Hunter 350 BaseTVS Apache RTR 160 4V RM Disc (Black Edition)
Rating
860 reviews
2 reviews
Brand Name Royal Enfield TVS
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.38 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 1.20 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled SI, 4 Stroke, Oil-Cooled, SOHC, Fuel Injection
Max Power 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm 17.55 PS @ 9250 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
TVS Apache RTR 160 4V Colors
Braking Type Anti-lock Braking System Anti-lock Braking System
Wheel Size Front :-17 Inch,Rear :-17 Inch Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Spoke Alloy
ABS Single Channel Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Analogue Digital
EMI
Rs. 3,965 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Rs. 3,454 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 11,005 Hunter 350 Insurance Rs. 10,706 Apache RTR 160 4V Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Spark Plugs
1 Per Cylinder
1 Per Cylinder
Valves (per cylinder)
2
4
Claimed Top Speed
114 kmph
114 kmph
Emission Norm Compliance
bs6.2
bs6.2
Flex Fuel Blend
E20
E20
Engine Type
Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled
SI, 4 Stroke, Oil-Cooled, SOHC, Fuel Injection
Engine Displacement
349 cc
159.7 cc
Gear Box
5 Speed
5 Speed
Max Power
20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
17.55 PS @ 9250 rpm
Max Torque
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
14.73 Nm @ 7500 rpm
Bore
72 mm
62 mm
Stroke
85.8 mm
52.9 mm
Number Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Fuel System
Electronic Injection
Fuel Injection
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
Electronic Fuel Injection
Electric Start
Compression Ratio
9.5 : 1
10.0:1

Front Brake
Disc
Disc
Rear Brake
Drum
Drum
Front Caliper
2 Piston
2 Piston
Rear Caliper
1 Piston
Not Available
Braking Type
Anti-lock Braking System
Anti-lock Braking System

Mileage (Overall)
36.2 kmpl
41 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
16.40s
Not Available
Braking 60-0 km/h
18.13m
Not Available
Power to Weight Ratio
Not Available
122.7
Average Speed
Not Available
Yes
Braking 80-0 km/h
32.08m
Not Available
Claimed Top Speed (Mode 1)
Not Available
114 kmph (Sport)
Braking 100-0 km/h
52.68m
Not Available
Estimated Mileage
35-40 kmpl
Not Available
Roll-ons 30-70 kmph (3rd Gear)
6.47s
Not Available
Roll-ons 40-80 kmph (4th Gear)
8.87s
Not Available
Fuel Gauge
Digital
Digital

Rear Suspension Preload Adjustment
Yes
Not Available
Rear Suspension Travel / Wheel Travel
100 mm
Not Available
Suspension-Front
Telescopic, 41mm forks
Telescopic Forks
Suspension-Rear
Twin shock absorbers with 6-step adjustable preload
Mono Shock

Front Tyre Pressure (Rider)
29 psi
Not Available
Front Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
29 psi
Not Available
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider)
32 psi
Not Available
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
33 psi
Not Available
Brake Fluid Grade
DOT4
DOT4
Tyre Size
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Front :-90/90-17, Rear :-110/80-17
Wheel Size
Front :-17 Inch,Rear :-17 Inch
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Make
CEAT
Eurogrip
Tyre Type
Tube
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
Yes
Yes
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Spoke
Alloy

Seat height
790 mm
800 mm
Load carrying capacity
179 kg
Not Available
Fuel Tank Reserve Capacity
2.6 L
Not Available
Gross Weight
360 kg
Not Available
Engine Oil Capacity
2.2 L
Not Available
Engine Oil Grade
SAE 15W 50 API SL grade JASO MA2 semi synthetic
Not Available
Length*Width*Height
2055*810*1070 mm3
2035*819*1050 mm3
Wheelbase
1370 mm
1357 mm
Length
2055 mm
2035 mm
Ground Clearance
160 mm
180 mm
Height
1070 mm
1050 mm
Width
810 mm
819 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity
13 L
12 L
Kerb Weight
177 Kg
143 Kg
Tail Light
Bulb
LED
Front Brake Size
300 mm
270 mm
Rear Brake Size
153 mm
130 mm

Battery Type
Lead Acid
Lead Acid
Roadside assistance
Optional
Not Available
USB charging port
Type C
Not Available
Headlight
Halogen
LED
Battery Capacity
12V / 8AH
12V / 6AH
Projector head light
Not Available
Yes

Frame Type
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
Double Cradle Split Synchro Stiff Frame
Digital Display Type
LCD
LCD
Malfunction Indicator
Yes
Yes
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Pillion Seat
Yes
Yes
Pillion Grab Rail
Yes
Yes
Riding Modes
Yes
Rain,Sports,Urban
Kill Switch
Yes
Yes
Low battery alert
Yes
Yes
No. of Tripmeters
3
Not Available
Rear Footpegs
Yes
Yes
Multi-function Lock
Yes
Yes
Daytime Running Lamps
Not Available
Yes
Additional Features/Information
Wet sump, forced lubrication, Paper element Air Cleaner
Glide through Technology
Voice Assist
Not Available
Yes
Gear Position Indicator
Yes
Yes
ABS Type
Single Channel
Single Channel
Side Stand Warning
Yes
Not Available
Physical Key
Yes
Not Available
Exhaust Heat Shield
Yes
Not Available
Front Footpegs
Forward-set
Forward-set
Body
Metal
Metal
Instrument Cluster Control Switchcube
Yes
Not Available
Handlebar type
Not Available
Hydroformed Handlebar
ABS
Single Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Roadster Bikes
Sports Naked Bikes
Body Graphics
Not Available
Yes
Instrument Console Type
Analogue and Digital
Digital
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Single
Pass Beam Switch
Yes
Yes
Speedometer
Analogue
Digital
Tachometer
Not Available
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Yes
Yes
Clock
Yes
Yes
Low Battery Indicator
Yes
Yes
Low Oil Indicator
Yes
Not Available
Cooling System
Air & Oil Cooled
Air & Oil Cooled
Key Shutter Lock
Not Available
Yes
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Service Due Indicator
Yes
Not Available
Saree Guard
Yes
Yes
Shift Light
Yes
Yes
Hazard Light Switch
Yes
Not Available

1st Service
500kms/45 days
500 -750 kms/30 days
2nd Service
5000kms/180 days
5000 - 6000kms/180 days
3rd Service
10000kms/360 days
11500 - 12000kms/365 days
4th Service
15000kms/540 days
17500 - 18000 kms/550 days

Vehicle Warranty
3 Years or 30,000 Km
Not Available
Standard Warranty (Years)
3
Not Available
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
30000
Not Available

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • Offering easy accessibility
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well
  • Absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity

Is TVS Apache RTR 160 4V Better Than Royal Enfield Hunter 350?

61% users have chosen TVS Apache RTR 160 4V over Royal Enfield Hunter 350 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 1332 users have also rated TVS Apache RTR 160 4V and Royal Enfield Hunter 350 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences TVS Apache RTR 160 4V is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for performance, comfort and safety in your bike. But Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is better on the grounds of mileage and maintenance.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Apache RTR 160 4V Hunter 350
Mileage 3.0 3.9
Performance 5.0 4.4
Comfort 5.0 4.5
Maintenance 3.0 3.8
Safety 5.0 0.2
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Review and Win Banner
Ad

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and TVS Apache RTR 160 4V

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.
|Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Community

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V FAQs

Which bike is best between Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V?
As per the users experiences Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage and maintenance in your bike. But TVS Apache RTR 160 4V is better on the grounds of performance, comfort and safety.
Which bike is cheaper Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V?
The TVS Apache RTR 160 4V is cheaper than Royal Enfield Hunter 350 by ₹17,750.
Which bike offers better performance Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V?
For the Base version, 349 cc Petrol engine of Hunter 350 produces 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the RM Disc (Black Edition) version, 159.7 cc Petrol engine of Apache RTR 160 4V produces 17.55 PS @ 9250 rpm of power and 14.73 Nm @ 7500 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 has better performance.

Images of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and TVS Apache RTR 160 4V

Which one do you like more?
Apache RTR 160 4V
Apache RTR 160 4V
Hunter 350
Hunter 350
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V
×