Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Price starts at Rs. 1.38 Lakh which is Rs. 18,950 costlier than base model of TVS Apache RTR 160 4V priced at Rs. 1.19 Lakh. The claimed mileage of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is 36.2 kmpl whereas the mileage of TVS Apache RTR 160 4V is 41 kmpl. In technical specifications, Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is powered by 349 cc engine , while TVS Apache RTR 160 4V is powered by 159.7 cc engine. Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is available in 10 different colours while TVS Apache RTR 160 4V comes with 6 colours. The Comparison Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Hunter 350 vs Apache RTR 160 4V

Key Highlights Hunter 350 BaseApache RTR 160 4V RM Disc (Black Edition)
Engine Type Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled SI, 4 Stroke, Oil-Cooled, SOHC, Fuel Injection
Max Power 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm 17.55 PS @ 9250 rpm

Hunter 350 vs Apache RTR 160 4V Key Highlights

Basic Info Royal Enfield Hunter 350 BaseTVS Apache RTR 160 4V RM Disc (Black Edition)
Rating
853 reviews
Be the first to review this bike
Brand Name Royal Enfield TVS
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.38 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 1.19 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled SI, 4 Stroke, Oil-Cooled, SOHC, Fuel Injection
Max Power 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm 17.55 PS @ 9250 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
TVS Apache RTR 160 4V Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Drum Drum
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Spoke Alloy
ABS Single Channel ...
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Analogue Digital
EMI
Rs. 3,965 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Rs. 3,419 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 10,377 Hunter 350 Insurance Rs. 10,686 Apache RTR 160 4V Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Displacement
349 cc
159.7 cc
Engine Type
Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled
SI, 4 Stroke, Oil-Cooled, SOHC, Fuel Injection
Engine Displacement
349 cc
159.7 cc
Max Power
20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
17.55 PS @ 9250 rpm
Max Torque
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
14.73 Nm @ 7500 rpm
Emission Type
BS6.2
BS6.2
Bore
72 mm
62 mm
Stroke
85.8 mm
52.9 mm
No Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
2
4
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
Electronic Fuel Injection
Electric Start
Compression Ratio
9.5 : 1
10.0:1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Front Brake
Disc
Disc
Rear Brake
Drum
Drum
Brakes Rear
Drum
Drum

Braking (60-0 kmph)
18.13m
...
Braking (80-0 kmph)
32.08m
...
Braking (100-0 kmph)
52.68m
...
Mileage (Overall)
36.2 kmpl
41 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
16.40s
...
Top Speed
114 kmph
114 kmph

Tyre Size
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Front :-90/90-17, Rear :-130/70-17
Peak Power
20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
17.55 PS @ 9250 rpm
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Make
CEAT
...
Tyre Type
Tube
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Spoke
Alloy
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
29 psi
...

Seat height
790 mm
800 mm
Load carrying capacity
179 kg
...
Length*Width*Height
2055*810*1070 mm3
2035*790*1050 mm3
Wheelbase
1370 mm
1357 mm
Length
2055 mm
2035 mm
Ground Clearance
160 mm
180 mm
Height
1070 mm
1050 mm
Width
810 mm
790 mm
Fuel Capacity
13 Liters
12 Liters
Kerb Weight
177 Kg
143 Kg
Total Weight
360 kg
...
Tail Light
Bulb
LED
Front Brake Diameter
300 mm
270 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
153 mm
130 mm

Call/SMS Alerts
...
Roadside assistance
...
USB charging port
...
Headlight
Halogen Bulb
LED
Battery Capacity
12V / 8AH
12V / 6AH
Turn Signal Lamp
Bulb
LED

Frame
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
Double Cradle Split Synchro Stiff Frame
Digital Display Type
LCD
LCD
Hazard Warning Indicator
High beam indicator
Malfunction Indicator
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
ABS
Single Channel
...
Body Type
Cruiser Bikes
Sports Naked Bikes
Body Graphics
...
Instrument Console
Analogue and Digital
Digital
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Single
Pass Switch
Speedometer
Analogue
Digital
Handle Type
...
Hydroformed Handlebar
Tachometer
Digital
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
Low Oil Indicator
...
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights
...
Cooling System
Air & Oil Cooled
Air & Oil Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
...
Service Due Indicator
...
DRLs
...

Standard Warranty (Years)
3
...
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
30000
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • Offering easy accessibility
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well
  • Absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Review and Win Banner

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

TVS Apache RTR 160 4V Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and TVS Apache RTR 160 4V

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.
|Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Community

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V FAQs

Which bike is cheaper Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V?
The TVS Apache RTR 160 4V is cheaper than Royal Enfield Hunter 350 by ₹18,950.
Which bike offers better performance Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V?
For the Base version, 349 cc Petrol engine of Hunter 350 produces 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the RM Disc (Black Edition) version, 159.7 cc Petrol engine of Apache RTR 160 4V produces 17.55 PS @ 9250 rpm of power and 14.73 Nm @ 7500 rpm of torque

Images of TVS Apache RTR 160 4V and Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Which one do you like more?
Apache RTR 160 4V
Apache RTR 160 4V
Hunter 350
Hunter 350
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V
×