Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 200 4V

TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Price starts at Rs. 1.42 Lakh which is Rs. 4,350 costlier than base model of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 priced at Rs. 1.38 Lakh. The claimed mileage of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is 36.2 kmpl whereas the mileage of TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is 37 kmpl. In technical specifications, Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is powered by 349 cc engine , while TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is powered by 197.75 cc engine. Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is available in 7 different colours while TVS Apache RTR 200 4V comes with 4 colours. The Comparison Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 200 4V can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Hunter 350 vs Apache RTR 200 4V

Key Highlights Hunter 350 BaseApache RTR 200 4V USD
Engine Type Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled SI, 4 stroke, Oil cooled, SOHC, Fuel Injection
Max Power 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm 20.82 PS @ 9000 rpm

Hunter 350 vs Apache RTR 200 4V Key Highlights

Basic Info Royal Enfield Hunter 350 BaseTVS Apache RTR 200 4V USD
Rating
814 reviews
4 reviews
Brand Name Royal Enfield TVS
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.38 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 1.42 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled SI, 4 stroke, Oil cooled, SOHC, Fuel Injection
Max Power 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm 20.82 PS @ 9000 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Drum Disc
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Spoke Alloy
ABS Single Channel Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Analogue Digital
EMI
Rs. 3,965 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Rs. 4,091 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 10,377 Hunter 350 Insurance Rs. 12,076 Apache RTR 200 4V Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Engine Type
Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled
SI, 4 stroke, Oil cooled, SOHC, Fuel Injection
Engine Displacement
349 cc
197.75 cc
Max Power
20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
20.82 PS @ 9000 rpm
Max Torque
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
17.25 Nm @ 7250 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Bore
72 mm
66 mm
Stroke
85.8 mm
57.8 mm
No Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
2
4
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
Electronic Fuel Injection
Mapped ignition system
Compression Ratio
9.5:1
10.0:1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Drum
Disc

Braking (60-0 kmph)
18.13m
16m
Braking (80-0 kmph)
32.08m
29.46m
Braking (100-0 kmph)
52.68m
...
Mileage (Overall)
36.2 kmpl
37 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
16.40s
12.23s
Top Speed
114 kmph
127 kmph

Tyre Size
Front :-110/70-17 Rear :-140/70-17
Front :-90/90-17 Rear :-130/70-17
Peak Power
20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
20.82 PS @ 9000 rpm
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tube
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Spoke
Alloy
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
29 psi
...

Seat height
790 mm
800 mm
Load carrying capacity
179 kg
...
Length*Width*Height
2055*810*1070 mm3
2020*820*1050 mm3
Wheelbase
1370 mm
1353 mm
Length
2055 mm
2020 mm
Ground Clearance
160 mm
180 mm
Height
1070 mm
1050 mm
Width
810 mm
820 mm
Fuel Capacity
13 Liters
12 Liters
Kerb Weight
181 Kg
151 Kg
Total Weight
360 kg
...
Tail Light
Bulb
LED
Saddle Height
790 mm
800 mm
Front Brake Diameter
300 mm
270 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
270 mm
240 mm

Additional Features
...
Maximum Speed - Urban/Rain Mode - 105 kmph, Maximum Torque Urban/Rain Mode - 16.51 Nm @ 5750 rpm, Maximum Power Urban/Rain Mode - 17.3 PS @ 7800 rpm, TVS SmartXonnect, Crash Alert, Idle Speed - 1550 ± 200 rpm, Air Cleaner Type - Viscous Paper Filter, DOT 3/4 brake fluid
Call/SMS Alerts
Roadside assistance
...
USB charging port
...
Headlight
Halogen Bulb
LED
Battery Capacity
12V / 8AH
12V / 6AH
Pilot Lamps
...
Turn Signal Lamp
Bulb
LED

Frame
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
Double Cradle Split Synchro Stiff Frame
ABS
Single Channel
Dual Channel
Body Type
Cruiser Bikes
Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
Instrument Console
Analogue and Digital
Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
Bluetooth
Bluetooth
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Split
Pass Switch
...
Display
Speedometer
Analogue
Digital
Handle Type
...
Hydroformed Handlebar
Tachometer
Digital
...
Tripmeter
Digital
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Techometer
Digital
...
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
...
Low Oil Indicator
...
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights
...
Cooling System
Air & Oil Cooled
Air Cooled & Liquid Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
Service Due Indicator
...
DRLs
...

Standard Warranty (Years)
3
...
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
30000
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • Offering easy accessibility
TVS Apache RTR 200 4V
  • The 200cc motor offers good low and midrange grunt along with a fun to ride nature
  • It gets 37mm golden coloured USD fork
  • It gets dual-channel ABS along with 3 ride modes: Sport, Urban and Rain, which change the power output
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well
  • Absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity
TVS Apache RTR 200 4V
  • Misses out on a 6-speed gearbox
  • 200cc motor makes less power when compared to other motorcycles in the segment
  • Does not get adjustable fork which the previous version used to have

Is Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Better Than TVS Apache RTR 200 4V?

50% users have chosen Royal Enfield Hunter 350 over TVS Apache RTR 200 4V in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 1273 users have also rated Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and TVS Apache RTR 200 4V on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for features in your bike. But TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is better on the grounds of mileage, performance, maintenance and safety. On the basis of comfort user have rated both the bikes equally.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Apache RTR 200 4V Hunter 350
Mileage 3.9 5.0
Performance 4.4 5.0
Comfort 4.5 4.5
Maintenance 3.8 4.5
Safety 0.1 1.3
Features 4.5 3.3
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Review and Win Banner

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and TVS Apache RTR 200 4V

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.
|Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Community

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Vs TVS Apache RTR 200 4V FAQs

Which bike is best between Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 200 4V?
As per the users experiences Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for features in your bike. But TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is better on the grounds of mileage, performance, maintenance and safety. On the basis of comfort user have rated both the bikes equally.
Which bike is cheaper Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 200 4V?
The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is cheaper than TVS Apache RTR 200 4V by Rs. 4,350.
Which bike offers better performance Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 200 4V?
For the Base version, 349 cc Petrol engine of Hunter 350 produces 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the USD version, 197.75 cc Petrol engine of Apache RTR 200 4V produces 20.82 PS @ 9000 rpm of power and 17.25 Nm @ 7250 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 has better performance.

Images of TVS Apache RTR 200 4V and Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Which one do you like more?
Apache RTR 200 4V
Apache RTR 200 4V
Hunter 350
Hunter 350
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 200 4V
×