Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 200 4V

Last Updated: August 3, 2026

TVS Apache RTR 200 4V price starts at Rs. 1.34 Lakh, which is Rs. 3,904 cheaper than the base variant of Royal Enfield Hunter 350, priced at Rs. 1.38 Lakh. In terms of mileage, the Hunter 350 offers a claimed 36.2 kmpl, while the Apache RTR 200 4V delivers 37 kmpl. On the performance front, the Hunter 350 uses a 349cc engine producing 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm and the Apache RTR 200 4V a 197.75cc engine producing 20.82 PS @ 9000 rpm. If you're deciding between the Hunter 350 and Apache RTR 200 4V, the Apache RTR 200 4V is the better pick for affordability and mileage.

...Read More

Hunter 350 vs Apache RTR 200 4V Comparison Summary

Specification Royal Enfield Hunter 350TVS Apache RTR 200 4V
Ex-showroom price (base) Rs. 1.38 LakhRs. 1.34 Lakh
Mileage 36.2 kmpl37 kmpl
Engine 349 cc197.75 cc
Max power 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm20.82 PS @ 9000 rpm
Kerb weight 177 Kg152 Kg

Hunter 350 vs Apache RTR 200 4V Key Highlights

Basic Info Royal Enfield Hunter 350 BaseTVS Apache RTR 200 4V 2Ch R Mode
Rating
855 reviews
9 reviews
Brand Name Royal Enfield TVS
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.38 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 1.34 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled SI, 4 stroke, Oil cooled, SOHC, Fuel Injection
Max Power 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm 20.82 PS @ 9000 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Colors
Braking Type Anti-lock Braking System Anti-lock Braking System
Wheel Size Front :-17 Inch,Rear :-17 Inch Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Spoke Alloy
ABS Single Channel Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Analogue Digital
EMI
Rs. 3,965 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Rs. 3,853 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 11,005 Hunter 350 Insurance Rs. 10,939 Apache RTR 200 4V Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Spark Plugs
1 Per Cylinder
1 Per Cylinder
Valves (per cylinder)
2
4
Claimed Top Speed
114 kmph
127 kmph
Emission Norm Compliance
bs6.2
bs6.2
Flex Fuel Blend
E20
E20
Engine Type
Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled
SI, 4 stroke, Oil cooled, SOHC, Fuel Injection
Engine Displacement
349 cc
197.75 cc
Gear Box
5 Speed
5 Speed
Max Power
20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
20.82 PS @ 9000 rpm
Max Torque
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
17.25 Nm @ 7250 rpm
Bore
72 mm
66 mm
Stroke
85.8 mm
57.8 mm
Number Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Fuel System
Electronic Injection
Fuel Injection
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
Electronic Fuel Injection
Mapped ignition system
Compression Ratio
9.5 : 1
10.0:1

Front Brake
Disc
Disc
Rear Brake
Drum
Disc
Front Caliper
2 Piston
2 Piston
Rear Caliper
1 Piston
1 Piston
Braking Type
Anti-lock Braking System
Anti-lock Braking System

Mileage (Overall)
36.2 kmpl
37 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
16.40s
12.23s
Braking 60-0 km/h
18.13m
16m
Power to Weight Ratio
Not Available
135.9
Average Speed
Not Available
Yes
Braking 80-0 km/h
32.08m
29.46m
Claimed Top Speed (Mode 1)
Not Available
127 kmph (Sport)
Braking 100-0 km/h
52.68m
Not Available
Estimated Mileage
35-40 kmpl
Not Available
Roll-ons 30-70 kmph (3rd Gear)
6.47s
5.57s
Roll-ons 40-80 kmph (4th Gear)
8.87s
7.34s
Fuel Gauge
Digital
Digital

Rear Suspension Preload Adjustment
Yes
Not Available
Rear Suspension Travel / Wheel Travel
100 mm
Not Available
Suspension-Front
Telescopic, 41mm forks
Telescopic suspension with Preload Adjuster
Suspension-Rear
Twin shock absorbers with 6-step adjustable preload
Mono Shock

Front Tyre Pressure (Rider)
29 psi
Not Available
Front Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
29 psi
Not Available
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider)
32 psi
Not Available
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
33 psi
Not Available
Brake Fluid Grade
DOT4
DOT4
Tyre Size
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Front :-90/90-17 Rear :-130/70-17
Wheel Size
Front :-17 Inch,Rear :-17 Inch
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Make
CEAT
Eurogrip
Tyre Type
Tube
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
Yes
Yes
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Spoke
Alloy

Seat height
790 mm
800 mm
Load carrying capacity
179 kg
Not Available
Fuel Tank Reserve Capacity
2.6 L
2.5 L
Gross Weight
360 kg
Not Available
Engine Oil Capacity
2.2 L
Not Available
Engine Oil Grade
SAE 15W 50 API SL grade JASO MA2 semi synthetic
Not Available
Length*Width*Height
2055*810*1070 mm3
2020*820*1050 mm3
Wheelbase
1370 mm
1353 mm
Length
2055 mm
2020 mm
Ground Clearance
160 mm
180 mm
Height
1070 mm
1050 mm
Width
810 mm
820 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity
13 L
12 L
Kerb Weight
177 Kg
152 Kg
Tail Light
Bulb
LED
Front Brake Size
300 mm
270 mm
Rear Brake Size
153 mm
240 mm

Battery Type
Lead Acid
Lead Acid
Call/SMS Alerts
Not Available
Yes
Roadside assistance
Optional
Not Available
USB charging port
Type C
Not Available
Headlight
Halogen
LED
Battery Capacity
12V / 8AH
12V / 8AH
Projector head light
Not Available
Yes
Pilot Lamps
Not Available
Yes

Frame Type
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
Double Cradle Split Synchro Stiff Frame
Digital Display Type
LCD
LCD
Malfunction Indicator
Yes
Yes
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Vehicle Location Tracking
Not Available
Yes
Pillion Seat
Yes
Yes
Pillion Grab Rail
Yes
Yes
Calls and Messaging
Not Available
Yes
Navigation assist
Not Available
Yes
Riding Modes
Yes
Rain,Sports,Urban
Kill Switch
Yes
Yes
Low battery alert
Yes
Not Available
No. of Tripmeters
3
2
Hill Hold
Not Available
Yes
Rear Footpegs
Yes
Yes
Multi-function Lock
Yes
Yes
Daytime Running Lamps
Not Available
Yes
Additional Features/Information
Wet sump, forced lubrication, Paper element Air Cleaner
Glide through Technology, GPS
Voice Assist
Not Available
Yes
Gear Position Indicator
Not Available
Yes
ABS Type
Single Channel
Dual Channel
Navigation Type
Not Available
Turn-by-turn
Side Stand Warning
Yes
Yes
Physical Key
Yes
Yes
Exhaust Heat Shield
Yes
Yes
Front Footpegs
Forward-set
Forward-set
Fall Alert
Not Available
Yes
Body
Metal
Metal
Telematics
Not Available
Yes
Instrument Cluster Control Switchcube
Yes
Not Available
Handlebar type
Not Available
Hydroformed Handlebar
ABS
Single Channel
Dual Channel
Body Type
Roadster Bikes
Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
Not Available
Yes
Instrument Console Type
Analogue and Digital
Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
Not Available
Yes
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Split
Pass Beam Switch
Yes
Yes
Speedometer
Analogue
Digital
Tachometer
Digital
Not Available
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Yes
Yes
Clock
Yes
Yes
Low Battery Indicator
Yes
Not Available
Low Oil Indicator
Yes
Not Available
Cooling System
Air & Oil Cooled
Air Cooled & Liquid Cooled
Key Shutter Lock
Not Available
Yes
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
Not Available
Yes
Service Due Indicator
Yes
Not Available
Saree Guard
Yes
Yes
Shift Light
Yes
Yes
Hazard Light Switch
Yes
Yes

1st Service
500 Km / 2 Months
500-750 Kms/30 Days
2nd Service
5000 Km / 6 Months
2500-3000 Kms/90 Days
3rd Service
10000 Km / 12 Months
5000-6000 Kms/180 Days
4th Service
15000 Km / 18 Months
8500-9000 Kms/11500-12000 Days
Air Filter Service Cost
Not Available
No
Spark Plug Service Cost
Not Available
No

Vehicle Warranty
3 Years or 30,000 Km
Not Available
Standard Warranty (Years)
3
Not Available
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
30000
Not Available

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • Offering easy accessibility
TVS Apache RTR 200 4V
  • The 200cc motor offers good low and midrange grunt along with a fun to ride nature
  • It gets 37mm golden coloured USD fork
  • It gets dual-channel ABS along with 3 ride modes: Sport, Urban and Rain, which change the power output
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well
  • Absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity
TVS Apache RTR 200 4V
  • Misses out on a 6-speed gearbox
  • 200cc motor makes less power when compared to other motorcycles in the segment
  • Does not get adjustable fork which the previous version used to have

Is Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Better Than TVS Apache RTR 200 4V?

67% users have chosen Royal Enfield Hunter 350 over TVS Apache RTR 200 4V in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 1341 users have also rated Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and TVS Apache RTR 200 4V on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for features in your bike. But TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is better on the grounds of mileage, performance, comfort, maintenance and safety.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Apache RTR 200 4V Hunter 350
Mileage 3.9 4.8
Performance 4.4 5.0
Comfort 4.5 4.6
Maintenance 3.8 4.6
Safety 0.2 3.0
Features 4.4 1.6
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Review and Win Banner

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and TVS Apache RTR 200 4V

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.
|Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Community

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Vs TVS Apache RTR 200 4V FAQs

Which bike is best between Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 200 4V?
As per the users experiences Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for features in your bike. But TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is better on the grounds of mileage, performance, comfort, maintenance and safety.
Which bike is cheaper Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 200 4V?
The TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is cheaper than Royal Enfield Hunter 350 by ₹3,904.
Which bike offers better performance Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 200 4V?
For the Base version, 349 cc Petrol engine of Hunter 350 produces 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the 2Ch R Mode version, 197.75 cc Petrol engine of Apache RTR 200 4V produces 20.82 PS @ 9000 rpm of power and 17.25 Nm @ 7250 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 has better performance.

Images of TVS Apache RTR 200 4V and Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Which one do you like more?
Apache RTR 200 4V
Apache RTR 200 4V
Hunter 350
Hunter 350
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 200 4V
×