QJ Motor SRK 400 vs Yamaha MT-03

Last Updated: July 30, 2026

Yamaha MT-03 price starts at Rs. 3.30 Lakh, which is Rs. 68,714 cheaper than the base variant of QJ Motor SRK 400, priced at Rs. 3.99 Lakh. In terms of mileage, the SRK 400 offers a claimed 20.6 kmpl, while the MT-03 delivers 26.31 kmpl. On the performance front, the SRK 400 uses a 400cc engine producing 41.46 PS @ 9000rpm and the MT-03 a 321cc engine producing 42 PS @ 10750 rpm. If you're deciding between the SRK 400 and MT-03, the MT-03 is the better pick for affordability and mileage.

...Read More

SRK 400 vs MT-03 Comparison Summary

Specification QJ Motor SRK 400Yamaha MT-03
Ex-showroom price (base) Rs. 3.99 LakhRs. 3.30 Lakh
Mileage 20.6 kmpl26.31 kmpl
Engine 400 cc321 cc
Max power 41.46 PS @ 9000rpm42 PS @ 10750 rpm
Kerb weight 186 Kg167 Kg

SRK 400 vs MT-03 Key Highlights

Basic Info QJ Motor SRK 400 STDYamaha MT-03 STD
Rating
8 reviews
63 reviews
Brand Name QJ Motor Yamaha
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 3.99 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 3.30 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type Inline Twin cylinder liquid cooled engine, 4 stroke 8 valves, DOHC 4-stroke, Liquid-cooled, DOHC, 4-valves
Max Power 41.46 PS @ 9000rpm 42 PS @ 10750 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
QJ Motor SRK 400 Colors
Yamaha MT-03 Colors
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel
Starting Push Button Start Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
EMI
Rs. 10,925 @ 6% (36 months)
Rs. 9,043 @ 6% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 24,099 SRK 400 Insurance Rs. 14,244 MT-03 Insurance
Brochure N/A
Download Brochure

Spark Plugs
Not Available
1 Per Cylinder
Valves (per cylinder)
4
2
Claimed Top Speed
145 kmph
170 kmph
Emission Norm Compliance
bs6.2
bs6.2
Flex Fuel Blend
Not Available
E20
Engine Type
Inline Twin cylinder liquid cooled engine, 4 stroke 8 valves, DOHC
4-stroke, Liquid-cooled, DOHC, 4-valves
Engine Displacement
400 cc
321 cc
Gear Box
6 Speed
6 Speed
Max Power
41.46 PS @ 9000rpm
42 PS @ 10750 rpm
Max Torque
37 Nm @ 7500rpm
29.5 Nm @ 9000 rpm
Bore
70.5 mm
68 mm
Stroke
51.2 mm
44.1 mm
Number Of Cylinders
2
2
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Fuel System
Fuel Injection
Fuel Injection
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
Electric
TCI
Compression Ratio
11.8:1
11.2 : 1

Front Brake
Double Disc
Disc
Rear Brake
Disc
Disc
Front Caliper
Not Available
2 Piston
Rear Caliper
Not Available
1 Piston

Mileage (Overall)
20.6 kmpl
26.31 kmpl
Fuel Gauge
Not Available
Digital

Suspension-Front
Telescopic Upside-Down
Telescopic Upside Down Forks (USD Forks), 37 mm Inner Tube
Suspension-Rear
Monoshock Suspension side aligned
Swingarm

Front Tyre Pressure (Rider)
Not Available
29 psi
Front Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
Not Available
29 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider)
Not Available
36 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
Not Available
36 psi
Tyre Size
Front :-110/70-17 Rear :-140/70-17
Front :-110/70-17 Rear :- 140/70-17
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
Not Available
Yes
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy

Seat height
785 mm
780 mm
Fuel Tank Reserve Capacity
Not Available
2.8 L
Length*Width*Height
2080*820*1085 mm3
2090*755*1070 mm3
Wheelbase
1425 mm
1380 mm
Length
2080 mm
2090 mm
Ground Clearance
150 mm
160 mm
Height
1085 mm
1070 mm
Width
820 mm
755 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity
13.5 L
14 L
Kerb Weight
186 Kg
167 Kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Front Brake Size
260 mm
298 mm
Rear Brake Size
240 mm
220 mm

Headlight
LED
LED
Battery Capacity
Not Available
12V / 7AH
Projector head light
Yes
Yes

Frame Type
Arch bar truck
Diamond
Digital Display Type
Not Available
LCD
Malfunction Indicator
Not Available
Yes
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Pillion Seat
Not Available
Yes
Kill Switch
Not Available
Yes
Low battery alert
Not Available
Yes
No. of Tripmeters
Not Available
2
Engine Temperature Indicator
Not Available
Yes
Rear Footpegs
Yes
Yes
Daytime Running Lamps
Yes
Yes
Gear Position Indicator
Not Available
Yes
Average Fuel Economy Indicator
Not Available
Yes
ABS Type
Dual Channel
Dual Channel
ABS
Dual Channel
Dual Channel
Body Type
Sports Naked Bikes, Sports Bikes
Sports Naked Bikes, Sports Bikes
Instrument Console Type
Digital
Digital
Starting
Push Button Start
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Split
Pass Beam Switch
Not Available
Yes
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Tachometer
Digital
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Not Available
Yes
Clock
Not Available
Yes
Low Battery Indicator
Not Available
Yes
Low Oil Indicator
Not Available
Yes
Cooling System
Liquid Cooled
Liquid Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Service Due Indicator
Not Available
Yes
Shift Light
Not Available
Yes
Hazard Light Switch
Not Available
Yes

1st Service
Not Available
1000 Kms / 2 Months
2nd Service
Not Available
10000 Kms / 6 Months
3rd Service
Not Available
20000 Kms / 1 Year

Vehicle Warranty
Not Available
2 Years or 30,000 Km
Standard Warranty (Years)
Not Available
2
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
Not Available
30000

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Yamaha MT-03
  • Looks aggressive and muscular, Engine offers good refinement and smooth power delivery, The light weight and low seat height makes the MT-03 a very approachable motorcycle
Yamaha MT-03
  • Engine lacks outright punch to make this a fun motorcycle in the city, Lack of features makes it a bit too old-fashioned in the segment, Being a direct import, prices will be high

Is Yamaha MT-03 Better Than QJ Motor SRK 400?

50% users have chosen Yamaha MT-03 over QJ Motor SRK 400 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 111 users have also rated Yamaha MT-03 and QJ Motor SRK 400 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Yamaha MT-03 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for features in your bike. But QJ Motor SRK 400 is better on the grounds of mileage, performance, comfort and maintenance.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor SRK 400 MT-03
Mileage 0.6 5.0
Performance 0.7 4.7
Comfort 4.8 5.0
Maintenance 0.6 5.0
Features 4.9 4.7
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Review and Win Banner

Latest News on QJ Motor SRK 400 and Yamaha MT-03

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which would be better in price and performance between Yamaha MT 03, KTM Duke390 and BMW G310R?
  • Go for duke 390 because low maintenance cost but bad mileage and it has super top speed I have crossed 170 and its 2020 model
Q. I wish to buy a street bike. I’m short and I have selected 4 bikes. I am single so I need to pick my mother and father may be, so which bike is good for a pillion rider? My dream bikes are BMW G310R, Honda CB300R, Benelli TNT 300 or Yamaha MT 03.
  • Blindly go for triumph speed 440 , if you are not short i would have recommended triumph scram 400x....these two are loaded with every features and best bikes with amazing and unbelievably cheap exshowroom price
  • Hi , are the parts reliable enough to pass on the bike to next generation?
  • Don't go for Benali... Spares not available. You can Trust Yamaha & Honda. BMW service cost is to high... No free service. Minimum service cost starts rs.6000/-
View All Answers
Q. Gd eve team, which is best, NINJA 300 or Yamaha MT 03? Let me know on what basis you're listing your options, whether you see BHP , NM or Mileage? I am curious to know about TVS zeppelin also, your comment on that please.
  • Hello Vivek, The Yamaha MT-03 has not been launched in India yet, and is unlikely to enter the country any time soon. The Ninja 300 on the other hand has been heavily localised with competitive pricing. It's a good all-rounder with a decent balance of efficiency and power. The TVS Zeppelin is just in its concept stage as of now. We believe TVS will take at least a year to bring the Zeppelin to production. Even then, it is likely to have only a small-capacity motor as the brand- known for sporty motorcycles would just be testing waters with a cruiser.
|QJ Motor SRK 400 Community

QJ Motor SRK 400 Vs Yamaha MT-03 FAQs

Which bike is best between QJ Motor SRK 400 vs Yamaha MT-03?
As per the users experiences QJ Motor SRK 400 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage, performance, comfort and maintenance in your bike. But Yamaha MT-03 is better on the grounds of features.
Which bike is cheaper QJ Motor SRK 400 vs Yamaha MT-03?
The Yamaha MT-03 is cheaper than QJ Motor SRK 400 by ₹68,714.
Which bike offers better performance QJ Motor SRK 400 vs Yamaha MT-03?
For the STD version, 400 cc Petrol engine of SRK 400 produces 41.46 PS @ 9000rpm of power and 37 Nm @ 7500rpm of torque. Whereas for the STD version, 321 cc Petrol engine of MT-03 produces 42 PS @ 10750 rpm of power and 29.5 Nm @ 9000 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the QJ Motor SRK 400 has better performance.

Images of Yamaha MT-03 and QJ Motor SRK 400

Which one do you like more?
SRK 400
SRK 400
MT-03
MT-03
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. QJ Motor SRK 400 vs Yamaha MT-03
×