KTM RC 200 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF
Last Updated: August 29, 2026
Suzuki Gixxer SF price starts at Rs. 1.44 Lakh, which is Rs. 87,505 cheaper than the base variant of KTM RC 200, priced at Rs. 2.32 Lakh. In terms of mileage, the RC 200 offers a claimed 35 kmpl, while the Gixxer SF delivers 45 kmpl. On the performance front, the RC 200 uses a 199.5cc engine producing 25 PS @ 10000 rpm and the Gixxer SF a 155cc engine producing 13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm. If you're deciding between the RC 200 and Gixxer SF, the Gixxer SF is the better pick for affordability and mileage, while the RC 200 stands out for performance.
...Read More
RC 200 vs Gixxer SF Comparison Summary
| Specification | KTM RC 200 | Suzuki Gixxer SF |
|---|---|---|
| Ex-showroom price (base) | Rs. 2.32 Lakh | Rs. 1.44 Lakh |
| Mileage | 35 kmpl | 45 kmpl |
| Engine | 199.5 cc | 155 cc |
| Max power | 25 PS @ 10000 rpm | 13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm |
| Kerb weight | 160 Kg | 148 Kg |
-
KTM RC 200
Rs. 2.32 Lakh EMI - Rs. 6,338 View August OffersSuzuki Gixxer SF
Rs. 1.44 Lakh EMI - Rs. 4,148 View August Offers
RC 200 vs Gixxer SF Key Highlights
| Basic Info | KTM RC 200 STD | Suzuki Gixxer SF STD |
|---|---|---|
| Rating |
148 reviews
|
10 reviews
|
| Brand Name | KTM | Suzuki |
| Ex-Showroom Price | Rs. 2.32 Lakh Check On Road Price | Rs. 1.44 Lakh Check On Road Price |
| Engine Type | Single Cylinder, Liquid Cooled, DOHC, FI Engine | 4-Cycle, 1-Cylinder, Air Cooled |
| Max Power | 25 PS @ 10000 rpm | 13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Colors | ||
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| ABS | Dual Channel | Single Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| EMI |
Rs. 6,338
@
6% (36 months)
|
Rs. 4,148
@
9.45% (36 months)
|
| Insurance | Rs. 12,583 RC 200 Insurance | Rs. 11,111 Gixxer SF Insurance |
| Brochure |
Download
Brochure
|
Download
Brochure
|
Engine |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brakes |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Suspension |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tyres |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dimensions |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electricals |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Features |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service Cost |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warranty |
|
Pros and Cons
- Positives
- Negatives
KTM RC 200
- Sharp but forgiving handling; Meatier torque band aids overall driveability; More accessible ergonomics makes for a better all-rounder
Suzuki Gixxer SF
- Sporty styling, Fantastic fit and finish levels, Great handling dynamics
KTM RC 200
- Tyres lack edge grip, letting down the otherwise great handling package; It is a bit pricey; The edgy design is quite polarising
Suzuki Gixxer SF
- Expensive!, Brakes lack bite and feedback, BS6 update has dropped performance
Latest News on KTM RC 200 and Suzuki Gixxer SF
-
All-New Yamaha YZF R2 vs KTM RC 200: Quick Comparison28 Aug, 2026 | By Team ZigWheels -
Top 5 KTM Bikes With The Highest Price Cuts Due To GST 2.02 Oct, 2025 | By Team ZigWheels -
KTM RC 200 vs Keeway K300 R: Performance Numbers Compared13 Feb, 2023 | By Team ZigWheels
KTM RC 200 Vs Suzuki Gixxer SF FAQs
Which bike is best between KTM RC 200 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF?
As per the users experiences KTM RC 200 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for features in your bike. But Suzuki Gixxer SF is better on the grounds of mileage, performance, comfort, maintenance and safety.
Which bike is cheaper KTM RC 200 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF?
The Suzuki Gixxer SF is cheaper than KTM RC 200 by ₹87,505.
Which bike offers better performance KTM RC 200 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF?
For the STD version, 199.5 cc Petrol engine of RC 200 produces 25 PS @ 10000 rpm of power and 19.2 Nm @ 8000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the STD version, 155 cc Petrol engine of Gixxer SF produces 13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm of power and 13.8 Nm @ 6000 rpm of torqueAs per the users experiences the KTM RC 200 has better performance.
Images of Suzuki Gixxer SF and KTM RC 200
Which one do you like more?
- Home ›
- New Bikes ›
- Compare Bikes ›
- KTM RC 200 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF
×

