KTM 160 Duke vs Suzuki Gixxer SF

Last Updated: October 18, 2026

Suzuki Gixxer SF price starts at Rs. 1.41 Lakh, which is Rs. 42,926 cheaper than the base variant of KTM 160 Duke, priced at Rs. 1.84 Lakh. In terms of mileage, the 160 Duke offers a claimed 36.5 kmpl, while the Gixxer SF delivers 45 kmpl. On the performance front, the 160 Duke uses a 164.2cc engine producing 19 PS @ 9500 rpm and the Gixxer SF a 155cc engine producing 13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm. If you're deciding between the 160 Duke and Gixxer SF, the 160 Duke is the better pick for performance and a lighter kerb weight, while the Gixxer SF stands out for affordability and mileage.

...Read More

160 Duke vs Gixxer SF Comparison Summary

Specification KTM 160 DukeSuzuki Gixxer SF
Ex-showroom price (base) Rs. 1.84 LakhRs. 1.41 Lakh
Mileage 36.5 kmpl45 kmpl
Engine 164.2 cc155 cc
Max power 19 PS @ 9500 rpm13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm
Kerb weight 147 Kg148 Kg

160 Duke vs Gixxer SF Key Highlights

Basic Info KTM 160 Duke STDSuzuki Gixxer SF STD
Rating
3 reviews
10 reviews
Brand Name KTM Suzuki
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.84 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 1.41 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type Liquid Cooled, 4 stroke, Single Cylinder, SOHC, Internal Combustion Engine 4-Cycle, 1-Cylinder, Air Cooled
Max Power 19 PS @ 9500 rpm 13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
KTM 160 Duke Colors
Suzuki Gixxer SF Colors
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Dual Channel Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
EMI
Rs. 5,291 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Rs. 4,054 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 11,778 160 Duke Insurance Rs. 13,322 Gixxer SF Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Spark Plugs
Not Available
1 Per Cylinder
Valves (per cylinder)
Not Available
2
Claimed Top Speed
Not Available
125 kmph
Emission Norm Compliance
bs6.2
bs6.2
Flex Fuel Blend
Not Available
E20
Engine Type
Liquid Cooled, 4 stroke, Single Cylinder, SOHC, Internal Combustion Engine
4-Cycle, 1-Cylinder, Air Cooled
Engine Displacement
164.2 cc
155 cc
Gear Box
6 Speed
5 Speed
Max Power
19 PS @ 9500 rpm
13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm
Max Torque
15.5 Nm @ 7500 rpm
13.8 Nm @ 6000 rpm
Bore
66 mm
56 mm
Stroke
48 mm
62.9 mm
Number Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Fuel System
Fuel Injection
Fuel Injection
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Compression Ratio
11.97 : 1
9.8:1

Front Brake
Disc
Disc
Rear Brake
Disc
Disc
Front Caliper
4 Piston
2 Piston
Rear Caliper
2 Piston
1 Piston

Mileage (Overall)
36.5 kmpl
45 kmpl
Average Speed
Yes
Not Available
Fuel Gauge
Digital
Digital

Suspension-Front
USD Front Fork, 138.2 mm
Telescopic
Suspension-Rear
Monoshock Suspension, 160.98 mm
Swing Arm

Front Tyre Pressure (Rider)
Not Available
29 psi
Front Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
Not Available
29 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider)
Not Available
33 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
Not Available
33 psi
Tyre Size
Front :-110/70-17,Rear :-140/60-17
Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-140/60-17
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy

Seat height
815 mm
795 mm
Fuel Tank Reserve Capacity
Not Available
2.4 L
Length*Width*Height
Not Available
2025*715*1035 mm3
Wheelbase
1357 mm
1340 mm
Length
Not Available
2025 mm
Ground Clearance
174 mm
165 mm
Height
Not Available
1035 mm
Width
Not Available
715 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity
10.1 L
12 L
Kerb Weight
147 Kg
148 Kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Front Brake Size
320 mm
Not Available
Rear Brake Size
230 mm
Not Available

Call/SMS Alerts
Yes
Yes
Headlight
LED
LED
Battery Capacity
12V / 8AH
12V / 3AH
Projector head light
Yes
Not Available

Frame Type
Split Trellis Frame
Diamond
Digital Display Type
LCD
LCD Connectivity
Malfunction Indicator
Yes
Yes
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Vehicle Location Tracking
Not Available
Yes
Pillion Seat
Yes
Yes
Pillion Grab Rail
Yes
Yes
Calls and Messaging
Yes
Yes
Navigation assist
Yes
Yes
Riding Modes
Yes
Not Available
Kill Switch
Yes
Yes
No. of Tripmeters
2
2
Engine Temperature Indicator
Yes
Not Available
Rear Footpegs
Yes
Yes
Daytime Running Lamps
Yes
Not Available
Additional Features/Information
SuperMoto Mode
Suzuki Ride Connect
Gear Position Indicator
Yes
Yes
Average Fuel Economy Indicator
Yes
Not Available
ABS Type
Dual Channel
Single Channel
Distance To Empty
Yes
Not Available
Side Stand Warning
Yes
Yes
ABS
Dual Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Sports Naked Bikes, Sports Bikes
Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
Yes
Yes
Instrument Console Type
Digital
Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
Bluetooth
Bluetooth
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Single
Pass Beam Switch
Yes
Yes
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Mobile Application
Yes
Yes
Tachometer
Digital
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Yes
Yes
Clock
Digital
Yes
Low Oil Indicator
Yes
Yes
Cooling System
Liquid Cooled
Air Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
Yes
Yes
Service Due Indicator
Yes
Yes
Saree Guard
Yes
Yes
Shift Light
Not Available
Yes

1st Service
Not Available
750-1000 Kms/30-45 Days
2nd Service
Not Available
3500-4000 Kms/120-135 Days
3rd Service
Not Available
7500-8000 Kms/240-255 Days
4th Service
Not Available
11500-12000 Kms

Vehicle Warranty
Not Available
2 Years or 30,000 Km
Standard Warranty (Years)
Not Available
2
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
Not Available
30000

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
KTM 160 Duke
  • Sporty Looks
  • A powerful engine
Suzuki Gixxer SF
  • Sporty styling, Fantastic fit and finish levels, Great handling dynamics
KTM 160 Duke
  • The pillion seat is narrow
  • No traction control
Suzuki Gixxer SF
  • Expensive!, Brakes lack bite and feedback, BS6 update has dropped performance

Is Suzuki Gixxer SF Better Than KTM 160 Duke?

100% users have chosen Suzuki Gixxer SF over KTM 160 Duke in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 21 users have also rated Suzuki Gixxer SF and KTM 160 Duke on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Suzuki Gixxer SF is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage in your bike. But KTM 160 Duke is better on the grounds of performance, comfort, safety and features. On the basis of maintenance user have rated both the bikes equally.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor 160 Duke Gixxer SF
Mileage 4.6 4.3
Performance 4.6 4.7
Comfort 4.4 5.0
Maintenance 4.0 4.0
Safety 2.8 3.0
Features 1.6 1.7
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Review and Win Banner
Ad

Latest News on KTM 160 Duke and Suzuki Gixxer SF

KTM 160 Duke Vs Suzuki Gixxer SF FAQs

Which bike is best between KTM 160 Duke vs Suzuki Gixxer SF?
As per the users experiences KTM 160 Duke is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for performance, comfort, safety and features in your bike. But Suzuki Gixxer SF is better on the grounds of mileage. On the basis of maintenance user have rated both the bikes equally.
Which bike is cheaper KTM 160 Duke vs Suzuki Gixxer SF?
The Suzuki Gixxer SF is cheaper than KTM 160 Duke by ₹42,926.
Which bike offers better performance KTM 160 Duke vs Suzuki Gixxer SF?
For the STD version, 164.2 cc Petrol engine of 160 Duke produces 19 PS @ 9500 rpm of power and 15.5 Nm @ 7500 rpm of torque. Whereas for the STD version, 155 cc Petrol engine of Gixxer SF produces 13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm of power and 13.8 Nm @ 6000 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the KTM 160 Duke has better performance.

Images of Suzuki Gixxer SF and KTM 160 Duke

Which one do you like more?
160 Duke
160 Duke
Gixxer SF
Gixxer SF
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. KTM 160 Duke vs Suzuki Gixxer SF
×