Hop Electric Oxo vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Price starts at Rs. 1.49 Lakh which is Rs. 16,401 costlier than base model of Hop Oxo priced at Rs. 1.33 Lakh. In technical specifications, Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is powered by 349.34 cc engine. Hop Oxo is available in 5 different colours while Royal Enfield Hunter 350 comes with 8 colours. The Comparison Hop Oxo vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Oxo vs Hunter 350

Key Highlights Oxo PrimeHunter 350 Retro
Engine Type ... Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
Max Power ... 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
Top Speed 82 km/Hr 114 kmph
Range 60-120 km/charge ...
Charging Time 4.45 Hr ...

Oxo vs Hunter 350 Key Highlights

Basic Info Hop Electric Oxo PrimeRoyal Enfield Hunter 350 Retro
Rating
28 reviews
751 reviews
Brand Name Hop Electric Royal Enfield
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.33 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 1.49 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type ... Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
Max Power ... 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
Fuel Type Electric Petrol
Colors
Hop Electric Oxo Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Drum
Braking Type Combi Brake System ...
Wheel Size Front :-457.2 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Spoke
Range 60-120 km/charge ...
Charging Time 4.45 Hr ...
ABS ... Single Channel
Starting Push Button Start Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Analogue
EMI ...
Rs. 4,318 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 5,656 Oxo Insurance Rs. 11,770 Hunter 350 Insurance
Brochure N/A
Download Brochure

Torque (wheel)
160 Nm
...
Engine Type
...
Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
Engine Displacement
...
349.34 cc
Max Power
...
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
Max Torque
...
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Emission Type
...
bs6-2.0
Continuous Power
3 Kw
...
Bore
...
75 mm
Stroke
...
85.8 mm
Motor IP Rating
IP67
...
No Of Cylinders
...
1
Drive Type
Hub Motor
Chain Drive
Battery Warranty
3 Years or 50,000 Km
...
Valve Per Cylinder
...
2
Motor Warranty
3 Years
...
Fuel Type
Electric
Petrol
Ignition
...
ECU controlled
Compression Ratio
...
9.5:1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Disc
Drum
Braking Type
Combi Brake System
...

Braking (60-0 kmph)
...
21.29m
Braking (80-0 kmph)
...
36.71m
Braking (100-0 kmph)
...
69.42m
Mileage (Overall)
...
36.2 kmpl
Top Speed
82 km/Hr
114 kmph

Tyre Size
Front :-90/90-18 Rear :-130/70-17
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Wheel Size
Front :-457.2 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tube
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Spoke
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
...
29 psi

Seat height
780 mm
790 mm
Load carrying capacity
250 kg
179 kg
Length*Width*Height
2100*793*1065 mm3
2055*800*1055 mm3
Wheelbase
...
1370 mm
Length
2100 mm
2055 mm
Ground Clearance
180 mm
150 mm
Height
1065 mm
1055 mm
Width
793 mm
800 mm
Fuel Capacity
...
13 Liters
Kerb Weight
140 Kg
177 Kg
Total Weight
...
360 kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Front Brake Diameter
240 mm
300 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
220 mm
153 mm

Battery Type
Li-ion
...
Motor Type
BLDC
...
Additional Features
Riding Mode - Eco | Power | Sports, E-ABS, Park Assist, Helmet reminder, Top Speed - Eco - 45, Power - 65, Sports - 82
...
Claimed range
60-120 km/charge
...
Regenerative braking
...
USB charging port
Range
60-120 km/charge
...
Fast Charging
...
Headlight
LED
Halogen
Range (Eco Mode)
120 km/charge
...
Range (Normal Mode)
80 km/charge
...
Charging Time
4.45 Hr
...
Charging Time(0-80%)
4 Hours
...
Range (Sport Mode)
60 km/charge
...
Charging Time(0-100%)
4 Hours 45 Minutes
...
Turn Signal Lamp
LED
Bulb

ABS
...
Single Channel
Body Type
Electric Bikes
Cruiser Bikes
Body Graphics
...
Starting
Push Button Start
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Single
Display
5 inch Smart LCD
Speedometer
Digital
Analogue
Tachometer
...
Digital
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Charging Point
...
Gradeability
13 Degree
...
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
...
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
...
Passenger Footrest
Charger Output
850 W
...
Cooling System
...
Air & Oil Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
EBS
...
Service Due Indicator
...
DRLs
...

Standard Warranty (Years)
3
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • offering easy accessibility.
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well and the absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity.
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.

Hop Electric Oxo Vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 FAQs

Which bike is cheaper Hop Electric Oxo vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
The Hop Oxo is cheaper than Royal Enfield Hunter 350 by Rs. 16,401.

Images of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Hop Oxo

×
Recently Visited
Select Category