Honda Hornet 2.0 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Last Updated: August 19, 2026

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 price starts at Rs. 1.38 Lakh, which is Rs. 11,960 cheaper than the base variant of Honda Hornet 2.0, priced at Rs. 1.50 Lakh. In terms of mileage, the Hornet 2.0 offers a claimed 57.35 kmpl, while the Hunter 350 delivers 36.2 kmpl. On the performance front, the Hornet 2.0 uses a 184.40cc engine producing 16.99 PS @ 8500 rpm and the Hunter 350 a 349cc engine producing 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm. If you're deciding between the Hornet 2.0 and Hunter 350, the Hornet 2.0 is the better pick for mileage and a lighter kerb weight, while the Hunter 350 stands out for affordability and performance.

...Read More

Hornet 2.0 vs Hunter 350 Comparison Summary

Specification Honda Hornet 2.0Royal Enfield Hunter 350
Ex-showroom price (base) Rs. 1.50 LakhRs. 1.38 Lakh
Mileage 57.35 kmpl36.2 kmpl
Engine 184.40 cc349 cc
Max power 16.99 PS @ 8500 rpm20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Kerb weight 142 Kg177 Kg

Hornet 2.0 vs Hunter 350 Key Highlights

Basic Info Honda Hornet 2.0 STDRoyal Enfield Hunter 350 Base
Rating
56 reviews
855 reviews
Brand Name Honda Royal Enfield
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.50 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 1.38 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type 4 Stroke, SI Engine Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled
Max Power 16.99 PS @ 8500 rpm 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Honda Hornet 2.0 Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
Braking Type Not Available Anti-lock Braking System
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-17 Inch,Rear :-17 Inch
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Spoke
ABS Dual Channel Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Analogue
EMI
Rs. 4,310 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Rs. 3,965 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 12,146 Hornet 2.0 Insurance Rs. 11,005 Hunter 350 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Spark Plugs
1 Per Cylinder
1 Per Cylinder
Valves (per cylinder)
2
2
Claimed Top Speed
130 kmph
114 kmph
Emission Norm Compliance
bs6.2
bs6.2
Flex Fuel Blend
E20
E20
Engine Type
4 Stroke, SI Engine
Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled
Engine Displacement
184.40 cc
349 cc
Gear Box
5 Speed
5 Speed
Max Power
16.99 PS @ 8500 rpm
20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Max Torque
15.7 Nm @ 6000 rpm
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Bore
61 mm
72 mm
Stroke
63.096 mm
85.8 mm
Number Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Fuel System
Fuel Injection
Electronic Injection
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
Not Available
Electronic Fuel Injection
Compression Ratio
9.5:1
9.5 : 1

Front Brake
Disc
Disc
Rear Brake
Disc
Drum
Front Caliper
2 Piston
2 Piston
Rear Caliper
1 Piston
1 Piston
Braking Type
Not Available
Anti-lock Braking System

Mileage (Overall)
57.35 kmpl
36.2 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
12.91s
16.40s
Braking 60-0 km/h
17.04m
18.13m
City Mileage (Tested)
57.35 kmpl
Not Available
Highway Mileage (Tested)
55.77 kmpl
Not Available
Braking 80-0 km/h
30.05m
32.08m
Braking 100-0 km/h
50.62m
52.68m
Estimated Mileage
Not Available
35-40 kmpl
Roll-ons 30-70 kmph (3rd Gear)
5.23s
6.47s
Roll-ons 40-80 kmph (4th Gear)
7.08s
8.87s
Fuel Gauge
Digital
Digital

Rear Suspension Preload Adjustment
Not Available
Yes
Rear Suspension Travel / Wheel Travel
Not Available
100 mm
Suspension-Front
Upside Down Fork (USD)
Telescopic, 41mm forks
Suspension-Rear
Monoshock
Twin shock absorbers with 6-step adjustable preload

Front Tyre Pressure (Rider)
25 psi
29 psi
Front Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
25 psi
29 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider)
25 psi
32 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
29 psi
33 psi
Brake Fluid Grade
Not Available
DOT4
Tyre Size
Front :-110/70-17 Rear :-140/70-17
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-17 Inch,Rear :-17 Inch
Tyre Make
Not Available
CEAT
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tube
Radial Tyre
Not Available
Yes
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Spoke

Seat height
790 mm
790 mm
Load carrying capacity
Not Available
179 kg
Fuel Tank Reserve Capacity
1.9 L
2.6 L
Gross Weight
Not Available
360 kg
Engine Oil Capacity
Not Available
2.2 L
Engine Oil Grade
Not Available
SAE 15W 50 API SL grade JASO MA2 semi synthetic
Length*Width*Height
2034*783*1064 mm3
2055*810*1070 mm3
Wheelbase
1356 mm
1370 mm
Length
2034 mm
2055 mm
Ground Clearance
168 mm
160 mm
Height
1064 mm
1070 mm
Width
783 mm
810 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity
12 L
13 L
Kerb Weight
142 Kg
177 Kg
Tail Light
LED
Bulb
Front Brake Size
276 mm
300 mm
Rear Brake Size
220 mm
153 mm

Battery Type
Not Available
Lead Acid
Call/SMS Alerts
Yes
Not Available
Roadside assistance
Not Available
Optional
USB charging port
Yes
Type C
Music control
Yes
Not Available
Headlight
LED
Halogen
Battery Capacity
12V / 5AH
12V / 8AH

Frame Type
Diamond Type
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
Digital Display Type
TFT
LCD
Malfunction Indicator
Yes
Yes
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Pillion Seat
Yes
Yes
Pillion Grab Rail
Yes
Yes
Calls and Messaging
Yes
Not Available
Navigation assist
Yes
Not Available
Riding Modes
Not Available
Yes
Traction Control
Yes
Not Available
Kill Switch
Yes
Yes
Low battery alert
Not Available
Yes
No. of Tripmeters
2
3
Rear Footpegs
Yes
Yes
Multi-function Lock
Not Available
Yes
Daytime Running Lamps
Yes
Not Available
Additional Features/Information
Honda RoadSync, Range Indicator, Weather Updates, Manage Messages Via Voice Commands, Seat Length - 590 mm, Honda Selectable Torque Control
Wet sump, forced lubrication, Paper element Air Cleaner
Gear Position Indicator
Yes
Yes
Average Fuel Economy Indicator
Yes
Not Available
ABS Type
Dual Channel
Single Channel
Distance To Empty
Yes
Not Available
Side Stand Warning
Yes
Yes
Physical Key
Not Available
Yes
Exhaust Heat Shield
Not Available
Yes
Front Footpegs
Not Available
Forward-set
Body
Not Available
Metal
Instrument Cluster Control Switchcube
Not Available
Yes
ABS
Dual Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Sports Bikes
Roadster Bikes
Body Graphics
Yes
Not Available
Instrument Console Type
Digital
Analogue and Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
Bluetooth
Not Available
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Single
Pass Beam Switch
Yes
Yes
Speedometer
Digital
Analogue
Mobile Application
Yes
Not Available
Tachometer
Digital
Not Available
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Yes
Yes
Clock
Yes
Yes
Low Battery Indicator
Not Available
Yes
Low Oil Indicator
Yes
Yes
Cooling System
Air Cooled
Air & Oil Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
Yes
Not Available
Service Due Indicator
Yes
Yes
Saree Guard
Yes
Yes
Shift Light
Not Available
Yes
Hazard Light Switch
Yes
Yes

1st Service
750-1000 Kms/15-30 Days
500 Km / 2 Months
2nd Service
5500-6000 Kms/165-180 Days
5000 Km / 6 Months
3rd Service
11500-12000 Kms/350-365 Days
10000 Km / 12 Months
4th Service
Not Available
15000 Km / 18 Months

Vehicle Warranty
3 Years or 42,000 Km
3 Years or 30,000 Km
Standard Warranty (Years)
3
3
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
42000
30000

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Honda Hornet 2.0
  • Looks very aggressive and sporty
  • Comes with a TFT display with switchable traction control and dual-channel ABS
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • Offering easy accessibility
Honda Hornet 2.0
  • Makes less power when compared to its rivals
  • Priced higher than its competitors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well
  • Absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity

Is Honda Hornet 2.0 Better Than Royal Enfield Hunter 350?

53% users have chosen Honda Hornet 2.0 over Royal Enfield Hunter 350 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 1424 users have also rated Honda Hornet 2.0 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Honda Hornet 2.0 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage, maintenance and safety in your bike. But Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is better on the grounds of performance, comfort and features.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Hornet 2.0 Hunter 350
Mileage 4.2 3.9
Performance 4.2 4.4
Comfort 3.8 4.5
Maintenance 4.0 3.8
Safety 0.3 0.2
Features 3.8 4.4
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Review and Win Banner

Honda Hornet 2.0 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Honda Hornet 2.0 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which one is better Hornet 2.0 & CB 300f. Mostly I have city commute and my priorities are performance and comfortable journey for rider as well as pillion. Which one should I go ?
  • The Honda CB300F offers better performance with its 293.52cc engine, while the Hornet 2.0 is more fuel-efficient with 42.3 kmpl mileage. If you prioritize power and a smooth ride, the CB300F is ideal, but for cost-effective city commuting, the Hornet 2.0 is a great choice. We recommend a test ride to find the best fit for your comfort needs. https://www.zigwheels.com/bike-comparison/honda-cb300f-vs-honda-hornet-20
Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
|Honda Hornet 2.0 Community

Honda Hornet 2.0 Vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 FAQs

Which bike is best between Honda Hornet 2.0 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
As per the users experiences Honda Hornet 2.0 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage, maintenance and safety in your bike. But Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is better on the grounds of performance, comfort and features.
Which bike is cheaper Honda Hornet 2.0 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is cheaper than Honda Hornet 2.0 by ₹11,960.
Which bike offers better performance Honda Hornet 2.0 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
For the STD version, 184.40 cc Petrol engine of Hornet 2.0 produces 16.99 PS @ 8500 rpm of power and 15.7 Nm @ 6000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Base version, 349 cc Petrol engine of Hunter 350 produces 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Honda Hornet 2.0 has better performance.

Images of Honda Hornet 2.0 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Which one do you like more?
Hornet 2.0
Hornet 2.0
Hunter 350
Hunter 350
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Honda Hornet 2.0 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350
×