Bajaj Pulsar N250 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350
Last Updated: October 21, 2026
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 price starts at Rs. 1.38 Lakh, which is Rs. 7,819 cheaper than the base variant of Bajaj Pulsar N250, priced at Rs. 1.45 Lakh. In terms of mileage, the Pulsar N250 offers a claimed 39 kmpl, while the Hunter 350 delivers 36.2 kmpl. On the performance front, the Pulsar N250 uses a 249.07cc engine producing 24.5 PS @ 8750 rpm and the Hunter 350 a 349cc engine producing 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm. If you're deciding between the Pulsar N250 and Hunter 350, the Pulsar N250 is the better pick for mileage and performance, while the Hunter 350 stands out for affordability.
...Read More
Pulsar N250 vs Hunter 350 Comparison Summary
| Specification | Bajaj Pulsar N250 | Royal Enfield Hunter 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Ex-showroom price (base) | Rs. 1.45 Lakh | Rs. 1.38 Lakh |
| Mileage | 39 kmpl | 36.2 kmpl |
| Engine | 249.07 cc | 349 cc |
| Max power | 24.5 PS @ 8750 rpm | 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm |
| Kerb weight | 164 Kg | 177 Kg |
-
Bajaj Pulsar N250
Rs. 1.45 Lakh EMI - Rs. 4,348 Get Navratri OffersRoyal Enfield Hunter 350
Rs. 1.38 Lakh EMI - Rs. 3,965 View October Offers
Pulsar N250 vs Hunter 350 Key Highlights
| Basic Info | Bajaj Pulsar N250 STD | Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Base |
|---|---|---|
| Rating |
190 reviews
|
866 reviews
|
| Brand Name | Bajaj | Royal Enfield |
| Ex-Showroom Price | Rs. 1.45 Lakh Check On Road Price | Rs. 1.38 Lakh Check On Road Price |
| Engine Type | Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, SOHC, 2 Valve, Oil Cooled, FI | Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled |
| Max Power | 24.5 PS @ 8750 rpm | 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Colors | ||
| Braking Type | Not Available | Anti-lock Braking System |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-17 Inch,Rear :-17 Inch |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Spoke |
| ABS | Dual Channel | Single Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Analogue |
| EMI |
Rs. 4,348
@
11.99% (36 months)
|
Rs. 3,965
@
9.45% (36 months)
|
| Insurance | Rs. 11,136 Pulsar N250 Insurance | Rs. 11,005 Hunter 350 Insurance |
| Brochure |
Download
Brochure
|
Download
Brochure
|
Engine |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brakes |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Suspension |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tyres |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dimensions |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electricals |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Features |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service Cost |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warranty |
|
Pros and Cons
- Positives
- Negatives
- Excellent engine performance with lots of grunt
- Comfortable ride quality
- 795mm seat height makes the bike accessible for shorter riders
- Lacks features like smartphone connectivity, which are common in the segment these days
- Could’ve gotten better build quality
Is Bajaj Pulsar N250 Better Than Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
62% users have chosen Bajaj Pulsar N250 over Royal Enfield Hunter 350 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 1633 users have also rated Bajaj Pulsar N250 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Bajaj Pulsar N250 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage, performance, maintenance and features in your bike. On the basis of comfort and safety user have rated both the bikes equally.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..
| Ratings Factor | Pulsar N250 | Hunter 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Mileage | 4.3 | 3.9 |
| Performance | 4.8 | 4.4 |
| Comfort | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Maintenance | 4.5 | 3.8 |
| Safety | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Features | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Videos of Bajaj Pulsar N250 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350
Bajaj Pulsar N250 Comparison with Similar Bikes
Latest News on Bajaj Pulsar N250 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350
Recently Asked User Questions
- Both the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Bajaj Pulsar N250 offer seat heights that can accommodate taller riders. The Hunter 350 features a seat height of 800mm, while the Pulsar N250 has a slightly taller seat height of 795mm. Both motorcycles provide comfortable ergonomics suitable for riders around 6 feet tall but it's advisable to test ride each to determine which aligns best with your comfort and riding preferences.https://www.zigwheels.com/bike-comparison/bajaj-pulsar-n250-vs-royal-enfield-hunter
- HUNTER 350
- Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Bajaj Pulsar N250 Vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 FAQs
Images of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Bajaj Pulsar N250
- Home ›
- New Bikes ›
- Compare Bikes ›
- Bajaj Pulsar N250 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350








