Bajaj Pulsar 220F vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Last Updated: October 12, 2026

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 price starts at Rs. 1.38 Lakh, which is Rs. 1,836 cheaper than the base variant of Bajaj Pulsar 220F, priced at Rs. 1.39 Lakh. On the performance front, the Pulsar 220F uses a 220cc engine producing 20.4 PS @ 8500 rpm and the Hunter 350 a 349cc engine producing 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm. If you're deciding between the Pulsar 220F and Hunter 350, the Pulsar 220F is the better pick for performance and a lighter kerb weight, while the Hunter 350 stands out for affordability.

...Read More

Pulsar 220F vs Hunter 350 Comparison Summary

Specification Bajaj Pulsar 220FRoyal Enfield Hunter 350
Ex-showroom price (base) Rs. 1.39 LakhRs. 1.38 Lakh
Mileage Not Available36.2 kmpl
Engine 220 cc349 cc
Max power 20.4 PS @ 8500 rpm20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Kerb weight 160 Kg177 Kg

Pulsar 220F vs Hunter 350 Key Highlights

Basic Info Bajaj Pulsar 220F STDRoyal Enfield Hunter 350 Base
Rating
27 reviews
866 reviews
Brand Name Bajaj Royal Enfield
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.39 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 1.38 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type Twin Spark FI Engine, Oil Cooled Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled
Max Power 20.4 PS @ 8500 rpm 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Bajaj Pulsar 220F Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
Braking Type Anti-lock Braking System Anti-lock Braking System
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm, Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-17 Inch,Rear :-17 Inch
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Spoke
ABS Single Channel Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Analogue
EMI
Rs. 4,169 @ 11.99% (36 months)
Rs. 3,965 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 11,035 Pulsar 220F Insurance Rs. 11,005 Hunter 350 Insurance
Brochure N/A
Download Brochure

Spark Plugs
2 Per Cylinder
1 Per Cylinder
Valves (per cylinder)
2
2
Claimed Top Speed
Not Available
114 kmph
Emission Norm Compliance
bs6.2
bs6.2
Flex Fuel Blend
E20
E20
Engine Type
Twin Spark FI Engine, Oil Cooled
Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled
Engine Displacement
220 cc
349 cc
Gear Box
5 Speed
5 Speed
Max Power
20.4 PS @ 8500 rpm
20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Max Torque
18.55 Nm @ 7000 rpm
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Bore
67 mm
72 mm
Stroke
62.4 mm
85.8 mm
Number Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Fuel System
Fuel Injection
Electronic Injection
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
Digital Twin Spark
Electronic Fuel Injection
Compression Ratio
9.8 : 1
9.5 : 1

Front Brake
Disc
Disc
Rear Brake
Disc
Drum
Front Caliper
2 Piston
2 Piston
Rear Caliper
1 Piston
1 Piston
Braking Type
Anti-lock Braking System
Anti-lock Braking System

Mileage (Overall)
Not Available
36.2 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
Not Available
16.40s
Braking 60-0 km/h
Not Available
18.13m
Braking 80-0 km/h
Not Available
32.08m
Braking 100-0 km/h
Not Available
52.68m
Estimated Mileage
Not Available
35-40 kmpl
Roll-ons 30-70 kmph (3rd Gear)
Not Available
6.47s
Roll-ons 40-80 kmph (4th Gear)
Not Available
8.87s
Fuel Gauge
Digital
Digital

Rear Suspension Preload Adjustment
Not Available
Yes
Rear Suspension Travel / Wheel Travel
Not Available
100 mm
Suspension-Front
37 mm Telescopic
Telescopic, 41mm forks
Suspension-Rear
Twin Hydraulic Suspension
Twin shock absorbers with 6-step adjustable preload

Front Tyre Pressure (Rider)
28 psi
29 psi
Front Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
28 psi
29 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider)
30 psi
32 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
32 psi
33 psi
Brake Fluid Grade
Not Available
DOT4
Tyre Size
Front :-90/90-17, Rear :-120/80-17
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm, Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-17 Inch,Rear :-17 Inch
Tyre Make
Not Available
CEAT
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tube
Radial Tyre
Yes
Yes
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Spoke

Seat height
805 mm
790 mm
Load carrying capacity
Not Available
179 kg
Fuel Tank Reserve Capacity
3.2 L
2.6 L
Gross Weight
310 Kg
360 kg
Engine Oil Capacity
Not Available
2.2 L
Engine Oil Grade
Not Available
SAE 15W 50 API SL grade JASO MA2 semi synthetic
Length*Width*Height
2035*750*1165 mm3
2055*810*1070 mm3
Wheelbase
1350 mm
1370 mm
Length
2035 mm
2055 mm
Ground Clearance
165 mm
160 mm
Height
1165 mm
1070 mm
Width
750 mm
810 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity
15 L
13 L
Kerb Weight
160 Kg
177 Kg
Tail Light
LED
Bulb
Front Brake Size
280 mm
300 mm
Rear Brake Size
230 mm
153 mm

Battery Type
Not Available
Lead Acid
Call/SMS Alerts
Yes
Not Available
Roadside assistance
Not Available
Optional
USB charging port
Yes
Type C
Headlight
LED
Halogen
Battery Capacity
12V / 8AH
12V / 8AH
Projector head light
Yes
Not Available

Frame Type
Double Cradle Down Tube
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
Digital Display Type
LCD
LCD
Malfunction Indicator
Yes
Yes
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Vehicle Location Tracking
Yes
Not Available
Pillion Seat
Yes
Yes
Pillion Grab Rail
Yes
Yes
Calls and Messaging
Yes
Not Available
Navigation assist
Yes
Not Available
Riding Modes
Not Available
Yes
Kill Switch
Yes
Yes
Low battery alert
Yes
Yes
Brightness Control
Yes
Not Available
No. of Tripmeters
2
3
Engine Temperature Indicator
Yes
Not Available
Rear Footpegs
Yes
Yes
Multi-function Lock
Not Available
Yes
Daytime Running Lamps
Yes
Not Available
Additional Features/Information
Not Available
Wet sump, forced lubrication, Paper element Air Cleaner
Gear Position Indicator
Yes
Yes
Average Fuel Economy Indicator
Yes
Not Available
ABS Type
Single Channel
Single Channel
Distance To Empty
Yes
Not Available
Navigation Type
Turn-by-turn
Not Available
Side Stand Warning
Yes
Yes
Physical Key
Yes
Yes
Exhaust Heat Shield
Yes
Yes
Front Footpegs
Not Available
Forward-set
Body
Not Available
Metal
Instrument Cluster Control Switchcube
Not Available
Yes
ABS
Single Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Sports Bikes
Roadster Bikes
Body Graphics
Yes
Not Available
Instrument Console Type
Digital
Analogue and Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
Bluetooth
Not Available
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Single
Pass Beam Switch
Yes
Yes
Speedometer
Digital
Analogue
Mobile Application
Yes
Not Available
Tachometer
Digital
Not Available
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Yes
Yes
Clock
Yes
Yes
Low Battery Indicator
Yes
Yes
Low Oil Indicator
Yes
Yes
Cooling System
Oil Cooled
Air & Oil Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
Yes
Not Available
Service Due Indicator
Yes
Yes
Saree Guard
Yes
Yes
Shift Light
Yes
Yes
Hazard Light Switch
Not Available
Yes

1st Service
500-750 Km /45 days
500kms/45 days
2nd Service
4500-5000 Km /240 days
5000kms/180 days
3rd Service
9500-10000 Km /365 days
10000kms/360 days
4th Service
Not Available
15000kms/540 days

Vehicle Warranty
5 Years or 75,000 Km
3 Years or 30,000 Km
Standard Warranty (Years)
5
3
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
75000
30000

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Most affordable Royal Enfield
  • Lightest Royal Enfield
  • Fun, sharp handling
  • Torquey J-series engine
  • Good real-world mileage
  • Neo-retro design
  • Wide colour choice
  • Dual-channel ABS
  • Low seat height
  • 3-year warranty
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Firm rear suspension
  • Weak top-end performance
  • Basic features
  • Base variant is bare
  • Slightly sporty posture
  • Lower ground clearance
  • Spongy brake levers

Is Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Better Than Bajaj Pulsar 220F?

50% users have chosen Royal Enfield Hunter 350 over Bajaj Pulsar 220F in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 1377 users have also rated Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Bajaj Pulsar 220F on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for comfort and features in your bike. But Bajaj Pulsar 220F is better on the grounds of mileage, performance, maintenance and safety.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Pulsar 220F Hunter 350
Mileage 3.9 4.4
Performance 4.4 4.9
Comfort 4.5 4.3
Maintenance 3.8 4.2
Safety 0.2 1.8
Features 4.4 2.8
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Review and Win Banner
Ad

Latest News on Bajaj Pulsar 220F and Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.
|Bajaj Pulsar 220F Community

Bajaj Pulsar 220F Vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 FAQs

Which bike is best between Bajaj Pulsar 220F vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
As per the users experiences Bajaj Pulsar 220F is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage, performance, maintenance and safety in your bike. But Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is better on the grounds of comfort and features.
Which bike is cheaper Bajaj Pulsar 220F vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is cheaper than Bajaj Pulsar 220F by ₹1,836.
Which bike offers better performance Bajaj Pulsar 220F vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
For the STD version, 220 cc Petrol engine of Pulsar 220F produces 20.4 PS @ 8500 rpm of power and 18.55 Nm @ 7000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Base version, 349 cc Petrol engine of Hunter 350 produces 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Bajaj Pulsar 220F has better performance.

Images of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Bajaj Pulsar 220F

Which one do you like more?
Pulsar 220F
Pulsar 220F
Hunter 350
Hunter 350
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Bajaj Pulsar 220F vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350
×