Bajaj Pulsar NS160 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Price starts at Rs. 1.50 Lakh which is Rs. 1,087 costlier than base model of Bajaj Pulsar NS160 priced at Rs. 1.49 Lakh. The claimed mileage of Bajaj Pulsar NS160 is 40.36 kmpl whereas the mileage of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is 36.2 kmpl. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar NS160 is powered by 160.3 cc engine , while Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is powered by 349.34 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar NS160 is available in 4 different colours while Royal Enfield Hunter 350 comes with 8 colours. The Comparison Bajaj Pulsar NS160 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.
Pulsar NS160 vs Hunter 350
| Key Highlights | Pulsar NS160 STD | Hunter 350 Retro |
|---|---|---|
| Engine Type | Oil Cooled, Twin Spark, 4-Valve FI DTS-i | Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine |
| Max Power | 17.2 PS @ 9000 rpm | 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm |
-
Bajaj Pulsar NS160
Rs. 1.49 Lakh EMI - Rs. 4,448 View April OffersRoyal Enfield Hunter 350
Rs. 1.50 Lakh EMI - Rs. 4,318 View April Offers
Pulsar NS160 vs Hunter 350 Key Highlights
| Basic Info | Bajaj Pulsar NS160 STD | Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Retro |
|---|---|---|
| Rating |
334 reviews
|
775 reviews
|
| Brand Name | Bajaj | Royal Enfield |
| Ex-Showroom Price | Rs. 1.49 Lakh Check On Road Price | Rs. 1.50 Lakh Check On Road Price |
| Engine Type | Oil Cooled, Twin Spark, 4-Valve FI DTS-i | Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine |
| Max Power | 17.2 PS @ 9000 rpm | 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Colors | ||
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Drum |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Spoke |
| ABS | Dual Channel | Single Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Analogue |
| EMI |
Rs. 4,448
@
11.99% (36 months)
|
Rs. 4,318
@
9.45% (36 months)
|
| Insurance | Rs. 11,192 Pulsar NS160 Insurance | Rs. 11,225 Hunter 350 Insurance |
| Brochure |
Download
Brochure
|
Download
Brochure
|
Engine |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brakes |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tyres |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dimensions |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electricals |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Features |
|
Pros and Cons
- Positives
- Negatives
Bajaj Pulsar NS160
- It packs a pretty powerful engine
- Shares the capable perimeter frame with larger Pulsars
- Stopping power is pretty good
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
- Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
- Offering easy accessibility
Bajaj Pulsar NS160
- Engine refinement could have been better
- It isn’t feature-rich like its segment rivals
- It is the heaviest 160cc motorcycle
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
- The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well
- Absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity
Is Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Better Than Bajaj Pulsar NS160?
55% users have chosen Royal Enfield Hunter 350 over Bajaj Pulsar NS160 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 2600 users have also rated Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Bajaj Pulsar NS160 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage, comfort and features in your bike. On the basis of performance and maintenance user have rated both the bikes equally.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..
| Ratings Factor | Hunter 350 | Pulsar NS160 |
|---|---|---|
| Mileage | 3.9 | 3.8 |
| Performance | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Comfort | 4.5 | 4.2 |
| Maintenance | 3.8 | 3.8 |
| Features | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Do you own a Car or Bike?
- Interact with community
- Become a Top Contributor
Add Car
Add Bike
Videos of Bajaj Pulsar NS160 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350
-
5 Bike Launches In June 2022: Bajaj Pulsar N160, Royal Enfield Hunter 350, TVS Zeppelin, And More 1 Jun, 2022 7908 views 6:8
-
5 Bike Launches In July 2022: TVS Zeppelin, Ducati Streetfighter V4 SP, Suzuki Katana, RE Hunter 350 and more 2 Jul, 2022 57653 views 5:10
-
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Ronin Comparison Review | Distinct Yet Contrasting | Zigwheels.com 8 Sep, 2022 4557 views 15:22
-
Kawasaki W175 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Retro Bikes Compared | Does The Kwacker Make Sense? 29 Jan, 2023 6548 views 6:5
-
2023 Bajaj Pulsar NS200 And Pulsar NS160 First Ride Review - Road + Track | USD Fork Added 25 Mar, 2023 18946 views 5:6
-
160cc Sporty Commuters Compared On Acceleration, Fuel Efficiency, Price And Features | ZigWheels 30 May, 2023 7639 views 14:52
Bajaj Pulsar NS160 Comparison with Similar Bikes
-
BajajPulsar NS160Rs. 1.49 LakhvsPulsar NS160 vs Apache RTR 160 4V
TVSApache RTR 160 4VRs. 1.25 Lakh -
BajajPulsar NS160Rs. 1.49 LakhvsPulsar NS160 vs Xtreme 160R 4V
HeroXtreme 160R 4VRs. 1.39 Lakh
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes
-
Royal EnfieldHunter 350Rs. 1.50 LakhvsHunter 350 vs Classic 350
Royal EnfieldClassic 350Rs. 1.95 Lakh -
Royal EnfieldHunter 350Rs. 1.50 LakhvsHunter 350 vs Meteor 350
Royal EnfieldMeteor 350Rs. 2.08 Lakh
Latest News on Bajaj Pulsar NS160 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350
-
2025 Bajaj Pulsar NS160 Is Better, But It’s Still Playing Catch-up25 Mar, 2025 | By Team ZigWheels -
BREAKING: Upcoming Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Spied Before Official Launch: Here’s What We Think23 Apr, 2025 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Bajaj Pulsar NS160 Flex Fuel Showcased At IBET (India Bio-Energy And Tech) Expo 20244 Sep, 2024 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Crosses 5 Lakh Sales Milestone28 Jan, 2025 | By Team ZigWheels
-
-
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Modified Into A Scrambler11 Jul, 2024 | By Team ZigWheels
-
2024 Bajaj Pulsar NS160 And Pulsar NS200 Launched27 Feb, 2024 | By Team ZigWheels
-
This Modified Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Is The Perfect Retro Scrambler12 Jun, 2024 | By Team ZigWheels
-
2024 Bajaj Pulsar NS200 And Bajaj Pulsar NS160 Unveiled Ahead Of Launch: Now More Feature-packed19 Feb, 2024 | By Team ZigWheels
-
BREAKING: Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Gets Gorgeous New Colourways4 Jan, 2024 | By Team ZigWheels
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
- HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
- Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
- The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.
Bajaj Pulsar NS160 Vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 FAQs
Which bike is best between Bajaj Pulsar NS160 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is better on the grounds of mileage, comfort and features. On the basis of performance and maintenance user have rated both the bikes equally.
Which bike is cheaper Bajaj Pulsar NS160 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
The Bajaj Pulsar NS160 is cheaper than Royal Enfield Hunter 350 by Rs. 1,087.
Which bike offers better performance Bajaj Pulsar NS160 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
For the STD version, 160.3 cc Petrol engine of Pulsar NS160 produces 17.2 PS @ 9000 rpm of power and 14.6 Nm @ 7250 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Retro version, 349.34 cc Petrol engine of Hunter 350 produces 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torqueAs per the users experiences in terms of performance both are same.
Images of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Bajaj Pulsar NS160
Which one do you like more?
Hunter 350
Pulsar NS160
×
