Atumobile AtumVader vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0

Last Updated: August 12, 2026

Atumobile AtumVader price starts at Rs. 1.46 Lakh, which is Rs. 20,100 cheaper than the base variant of Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0, priced at Rs. 1.66 Lakh. In terms of efficiency, the MT 15 Version 2.0 returns a claimed 56.87 kmpl, while the AtumVader offers a claimed 100 km/charge. On the performance front, the AtumVader uses a 2.9Kwh battery producing 2.9 kW and the MT 15 Version 2.0 a 155cc engine producing 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm. If you're deciding between the AtumVader and MT 15 Version 2.0, the AtumVader is the better pick for affordability and a lighter kerb weight.

...Read More

AtumVader vs MT 15 Version 2.0 Comparison Summary

Specification Atumobile AtumVaderYamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
Ex-showroom price (base) Rs. 1.46 LakhRs. 1.66 Lakh
Mileage / Range 100 km/charge56.87 kmpl
Engine / Battery 2.9 Kwh155 cc
Max power / Motor 2.9 kW18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm
Kerb weight 114 Kg141 Kg

AtumVader vs MT 15 Version 2.0 Key Highlights

Basic Info Atumobile AtumVader SYamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 Metallic Black
Rating
6 reviews
1676 reviews
Brand Name Atumobile Yamaha
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.46 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 1.66 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type Not Available Liquid Cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve
Max Power 2.9 kW 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm
Fuel Type Electric Petrol
Colors
Atumobile AtumVader Colors
Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 Colors
Braking Type Combi Brake System Not Available
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm Rear :-431.8 mm inch
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Spoke Alloy
Range 100 km/charge Not Available
Charging Time 4 Hr Not Available
ABS Not Available Dual Channel
Starting Push Button Start Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
Running Cost Rs. 0.19/km Rs. 1.76/km
EMI Not Available
Rs. 4,785 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 19,965 AtumVader Insurance Rs. 11,483 MT 15 Version 2.0 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Spark Plugs
Not Available
1 Per Cylinder
Valves (per cylinder)
Not Available
4
Claimed Top Speed
65 km/Hr
122 kmph
Emission Norm Compliance
Not Available
bs6.2
Motor Torque
110 Nm
Not Available
Flex Fuel Blend
Not Available
E20
Engine Type
Not Available
Liquid Cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve
Engine Displacement
Not Available
155 cc
Gear Box
Not Available
6 Speed
Max Power
2.9 kW
18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm
Max Torque
Not Available
14.1 Nm @ 7500 rpm
Bore
Not Available
58.0 mm
Stroke
Not Available
58.7 mm
Number Of Cylinders
Not Available
1
Drive Type
Not Available
Chain Drive
Fuel System
Not Available
Fuel Injection
Fuel Type
Electric
Petrol
Compression Ratio
Not Available
11.6 : 1

Front Brake
Drum
Disc
Rear Brake
Drum
Disc
Front Caliper
Not Available
2 Piston
Rear Caliper
Not Available
1 Piston
Braking Type
Combi Brake System
Not Available

Mileage (Overall)
Not Available
56.87 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
Not Available
14.28s
Braking 60-0 km/h
Not Available
19.79m
City Mileage (Tested)
Not Available
56.87 kmpl
Highway Mileage (Tested)
Not Available
47.94 kmpl
Braking 80-0 km/h
Not Available
35.05m
Braking 100-0 km/h
Not Available
58.20m
Estimated Mileage
Not Available
45-50 kmpl
Roll-ons 30-70 kmph (3rd Gear)
Not Available
5.85s
Roll-ons 40-80 kmph (4th Gear)
Not Available
7.54s
Fuel Gauge
Not Available
Digital

Suspension-Front
Telescopic, 31mm Conventional Fork
Telescopic Upside Down Front Fork, Dia. 37 mm
Suspension-Rear
Telescopic, 31mm Conventional Fork
Linked Type Monocross Suspension

Front Tyre Pressure (Rider)
30 psi
32 psi
Front Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
Not Available
32 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider)
33 psi
36 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
Not Available
39 psi
Tyre Size
Front :-100/90-17 Rear :-100/90-17
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/70R-17
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm Rear :-431.8 mm inch
Tyre Type
Tube
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
Not Available
Yes
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Spoke
Alloy

Seat height
800 mm
810 mm
Fuel Tank Reserve Capacity
Not Available
1.6 L
Gross Weight
194 kg
Not Available
Length*Width*Height
2068*781*1220 mm3
2015*800*1070 mm3
Wheelbase
1355 mm
1325 mm
Length
2068 mm
2015 mm
Ground Clearance
227 mm
170 mm
Height
1220 mm
1070 mm
Width
781 mm
800 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity
Not Available
10 L
Kerb Weight
114 Kg
141 Kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Front Brake Size
130 mm
282 mm
Rear Brake Size
130 mm
220 mm

Battery Type
Li-ion
Not Available
Motor Type
BLDC
Not Available
Motor Power
1.5 kW
Not Available
Claimed range
100 km/charge
Not Available
Call/SMS Alerts
Yes
Not Available
Music control
Yes
Not Available
Conventional Charging Time
4 Hours
Not Available
Range (Mode 1)
100 km/charge
Not Available
Range
100 km/charge
Not Available
Headlight
LED with AHO
LED
Charging at Home
Yes
Not Available
Battery Capacity
2.9 Kwh
12V / 4AH
Projector head light
Not Available
Yes
Charging Time
4 Hr
Not Available
Pilot Lamps
Not Available
Yes

Cruise Control
Yes
Not Available
Frame Type
Not Available
Deltabox
Digital Display Type
Not Available
LCD
Malfunction Indicator
Not Available
Yes
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Pillion Seat
Not Available
Yes
Calls and Messaging
Yes
Not Available
Navigation assist
Yes
Not Available
Riding Modes
Yes
Not Available
Traction Control
Not Available
Yes
Kill Switch
Yes
Yes
Low battery alert
Yes
Not Available
Brightness Control
Not Available
Yes
No. of Tripmeters
Not Available
2
Rear Footpegs
Not Available
Yes
Daytime Running Lamps
Not Available
Yes
Additional Features/Information
Riding Mode - Eco | Drive | Sport | Reverse, Charger Cut Off Sensor, Combination Switch, Brake Lever Cut Off Switches, Battery Charging Percentage
Variable Valve Actuation (VVA)
Gear Position Indicator
Not Available
Yes
ABS Type
Not Available
Dual Channel
Distance To Empty
Yes
Not Available
Side Stand Warning
Yes
Yes
Reverse Assist
Yes
Not Available
ABS
Not Available
Dual Channel
Body Type
Electric Bikes, Cafe Racer Bikes
Sports Naked Bikes, Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
Not Available
Yes
Instrument Console Type
Digital
Digital
Starting
Push Button Start
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Split
Pass Beam Switch
Not Available
Yes
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Tachometer
Not Available
Digital
Gradeability
7 Degree
Not Available
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Not Available
Yes
Clock
Yes
Yes
Low Battery Indicator
Yes
Not Available
Low Oil Indicator
Not Available
Yes
Underseat storage
14 L
Not Available
Charger Output
15 Amp.
Not Available
Cooling System
Not Available
Liquid Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
Yes
Not Available
Saree Guard
Not Available
Yes
Shift Light
Not Available
Yes

1st Service
Not Available
1000 Kms / 1 Month
2nd Service
Not Available
5000 Kms / 5 Months
3rd Service
Not Available
9000 Kms / 9 Months
4th Service
Not Available
13000 Kms

Vehicle Warranty
Not Available
2 Years or 30,000 Km
Standard Warranty (Years)
Not Available
2
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
Not Available
30000

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
  • A refined engine
  • Sporty handling, and nimble
  • Looks aggressive
Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
  • Lacks bottom end grunt
  • Stiff suspension
  • Pillion seat is not comfortable
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Review and Win Banner

Latest News on Atumobile AtumVader and Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. What should I buy between Yamaha MT 15 V2 and R15S?
  • Yes
  • MT 15 V2 bike
  • Both the bikes are good in their forte. The updates as expected have made the new MT-15 a better bike. It looks more premium, handles better and the addition of a few new features is welcome. But we were expecting more from Yamaha! The dullness of the engine is disappointing and the lack of dual-channel ABS is just beyond any reasoning with this performance on tap. As for goodies such as a quick-shifter and traction control, they should have been offered as part of a premium variant. On the other hand, the Yamaha R15S remains one potent small-capacity supersport for beginners. In its version 3.0 guise, it has become sharper and more focused, making it great for sport riding or trac enthusiasts. However, the aggressive riding stance could cause discomfort if you intend to use the bike for daily commuting and the quality of components have also gone down. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride for a better understanding of performance and comfort. Click on the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
Q. Which bike is the best between, Yamaha MT-15 Version 2.0 or KTM 200 Duke?
  • Both the bikes are good in their forte. The design update has given the KTM 200 Duke a new lease of life. Also, the fact that the new BS6-compliant motor does not lose out on performance almost makes it feel like a win-win. That said, the substantial hike in price means it is now more expensive than larger motorcycles such as the Suzuki Gixxer 250. However, when it comes to thrills, the KTM 200 Duke delivers it in spades! On the other hand, The updates as expected have made the new MT-15 a better bike. It looks more premium, handles better and the addition of a few new features is welcome. But we were expecting more from Yamaha! The dullness of the engine is disappointing and the lack of dual-channel ABS is just beyond any reasoning with this performance on tap. As for goodies such as a quick-shifter and traction control, they should have been offered as part of a premium variant. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.Read more -Yamaha MT-15 Version 2.0 Road Test Review - The Perfect Imperfection.

Atumobile AtumVader Vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 FAQs

Which bike is best between Atumobile AtumVader vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0?
Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 has out rated Atumobile AtumVader on all the rating factors.
Which bike is cheaper Atumobile AtumVader vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0?
The Atumobile AtumVader is cheaper than Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 by ₹20,100.
Which bike offers better performance Atumobile AtumVader vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0?
As per the users experiences the Atumobile AtumVader has better performance.

Images of Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 and Atumobile AtumVader

Which one do you like more?
MT 15 Version 2.0
MT 15 Version 2.0
AtumVader
AtumVader
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Atumobile AtumVader vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
×