Komaki Ranger vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Price starts at Rs. 1.38 Lakh which is Rs. 7,641 costlier than base model of Komaki Ranger priced at Rs. 1.30 Lakh. In technical specifications, Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is powered by 349 cc engine. Komaki Ranger is available in 1 different colours while Royal Enfield Hunter 350 comes with 7 colours. The Comparison Komaki Ranger vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Ranger vs Hunter 350

Key Highlights Ranger STDHunter 350 Base
Engine Type ... Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled
Max Power ... 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Top Speed 80 km/Hr 114 kmph
Range 160-200 km/charge ...
Charging Time 4-5 Hr ...

Ranger vs Hunter 350 Key Highlights

Basic Info Komaki Ranger STDRoyal Enfield Hunter 350 Base
Rating
80 reviews
780 reviews
Brand Name Komaki Royal Enfield
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.30 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 1.38 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type ... Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled
Max Power ... 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Fuel Type Electric Petrol
Colors
Komaki Ranger Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Drum
Braking Type Combi Brake System ...
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Spoke
Range 160-200 km/charge ...
Charging Time 4-5 Hr ...
ABS ... Single Channel
Starting Push Button Start Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Analogue
Running Cost Rs. 0.15/km Rs. 2.76/km
EMI ...
Rs. 3,965 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 5,593 Ranger Insurance Rs. 10,377 Hunter 350 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Engine Type
...
Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled
Engine Displacement
...
349 cc
No. Of Batteries
1
...
Max Power
...
20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Max Torque
...
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Emission Type
...
bs6-2.0
Bore
...
72 mm
Stroke
...
85.8 mm
No Of Cylinders
...
1
Drive Type
Hub Motor
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
...
2
Fuel Type
Electric
Petrol
Ignition
...
Electronic Fuel Injection
Compression Ratio
...
9.5:1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Disc
Drum
Braking Type
Combi Brake System
...

Braking (60-0 kmph)
...
18.13m
Braking (80-0 kmph)
...
32.08m
Braking (100-0 kmph)
...
52.68m
Mileage (Overall)
...
36.2 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
...
16.40s
Top Speed
80 km/Hr
114 kmph

Tyre Size
...
Front :-110/70-17 Rear :-140/70-17
Peak Power
...
20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tube
Radial Tyre
...
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Spoke
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
...
29 psi

Seat height
...
790 mm
Load carrying capacity
...
179 kg
Length*Width*Height
...
2055*810*1070 mm3
Wheelbase
...
1370 mm
Length
...
2055 mm
Ground Clearance
...
160 mm
Height
...
1070 mm
Width
...
810 mm
Fuel Capacity
...
13 Liters
Kerb Weight
...
181 Kg
Total Weight
...
360 kg
Tail Light
LED
Bulb
Saddle Height
...
790 mm
Front Brake Diameter
...
300 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
...
270 mm

Battery Type
Li-ion
...
Motor Type
BLDC
...
Claimed range
160-200 km/charge
...
Call/SMS Alerts
Roadside assistance
...
USB charging port
Range
160-200 km/charge
...
Headlight
LED
Halogen Bulb
Charging at Home
...
Range (Eco Mode)
200 km/charge
...
Battery Capacity
3.6 Kwh
12V / 8AH
Charging Time
4-5 Hr
...
Turn Signal Lamp
LED
Bulb
Power Modes
...

Cruise Control
...
Frame
...
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
ABS
...
Single Channel
Body Type
Electric Bikes, Cruiser Bikes
Cruiser Bikes
Body Graphics
...
Instrument Console
Digital
Analogue and Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
Bluetooth
Bluetooth
Starting
Push Button Start
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Single
Display
Speedometer
Digital
Analogue
Tachometer
...
Digital
Tripmeter
Digital
Digital
Charging Point
...
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
...
Techometer
...
Digital
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
Low Oil Indicator
...
Passenger Footrest
Passenger Backrest
...
Underseat storage
...
External Speakers
...
Cooling System
...
Air & Oil Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
...
EBS
...
Service Due Indicator
...

Standard Warranty (Years)
...
3
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
...
30000

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • Offering easy accessibility
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well
  • Absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Review and Win Banner

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Komaki Ranger and Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.
|Komaki Ranger Community

Komaki Ranger Vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 FAQs

Which bike is best between Komaki Ranger vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
As per the users experiences Komaki Ranger is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage, performance, comfort and maintenance in your bike. On the basis of features user have rated both the bikes equally.
Which bike is cheaper Komaki Ranger vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
The Komaki Ranger is cheaper than Royal Enfield Hunter 350 by Rs. 7,641.
Which bike offers better performance Komaki Ranger vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
As per the users experiences the Komaki Ranger has better performance.

Images of Komaki Ranger and Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Which one do you like more?
Ranger
Ranger
Hunter 350
Hunter 350
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Komaki Ranger vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350
×