×

Bajaj Pulsar 220 F vs TVS Apache 160 4V Comparison

Bajaj Pulsar 220 F vs TVS Apache 160 4V

Bajaj Pulsar 220 F Price starts at Rs. 1.08 lakh which is Rs. 16,020 costlier than TVS Apache RTR 160 4V priced at Rs. 92,306. The claimed mileage for the Bajaj Pulsar 220 F is 40 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for TVS Apache RTR 160 4V is 50.9 kmpl. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar 220 F is powered by 220 cc engine where as TVS Apache RTR 160 4V is powered by 159.7 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar 220 F is available in 7 different colours while TVS Apache RTR 160 4V comes with 8 colours. 58% users have chosen TVS Apache RTR 160 4V over Bajaj Pulsar 220 F in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Bajaj Pulsar 220 F vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V on the basis of price, specifications & other features.

Engine Type 4-stroke, 2-Valve, Twin Spark BSIV Compliant, DTS-I Engine, Oil cooled Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, OHC, SI Engine
Engine Displacement (CC) 220 cc 159.7 cc
Power (PS@rpm) 20.93 PS @ 8500 rpm 16.5 PS @ 8000 rpm
Torque (Nm@rpm)
Bore 62 mm
Stroke 52.9 mm
No Of Cylinders 1 1
Drive Type Chain Drive Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder 2 4
Fuel System
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Ignition Digital Twin Spark
Compression Ratio 9.5:1
Engine Immobilizer
Transmission Type Manual Manual
No Of Gears 5 Speed 5 Speed
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Drum
Braking Type
0-60 kmph (sec) 3.9s 5.04s
Quarter Mile 19.23 s @ 106.1 kmph
Braking (60-0 kmph) 22.20m
20-80 kmph (kickdown)
30-70 kmph (3rd gear)
40-80 kmph (4th gear)
Braking (80-0 kmph) 41.51m
Braking (100-0 kmph)
Mileage (City) 50.94 kmpl
Mileage (Highway) 56.1 kmpl
Mileage (Overall) 50 kmpl
Mileage (ARAI) kmpl 40 kmpl
0-100 kmph (sec) 15.36s
Top Speed (Km/h)
0-160 kmph
Braking 60-0 km/h 22.20m
Chassis Type
Suspension-Front Telescopic With Anti - Friction Bush Telescopic Forks
Chassis Double Cradle Split Synchro STIFF
Suspension-Rear 5 Way Adjustable Nitrox Shock Absorber Monoshock
Tyre Size Front :-90/90-17, Rear :-120/80-17 Front :-90/90-17, Rear :-110/80-17
Wheel Size Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch
Tyre Make
Tyre Type Tubeless Tubeless
Radial Tyre Yes
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) 25 psi 25 psi
Optimum Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
Dry Weight
Length*Width*Height 2035*750*1165 2050*790*1050
Wheelbase(mm) 1350 mm 1357 mm
Length 2035 mm 2050 mm
Ground Clearance (mm) 165 mm 180 mm
Height 1165 mm 1050 mm
Seat Height 795 mm 800 mm
Width 750 mm 790 mm
Fuel Capacity (Litres) 15 L 12 L
Kerb Weight
Total Weight
Tail Light LED LED
Front Brake Diameter 260 mm 270 mm
Rear Brake Diameter 230 mm 130 mm
Battery Type Full DC Maintenance Free
Charging Time
Motor Type
Motor Power
Fast Charging
Battery
Range
Head Lamp
Projector head light
Pilot Lamps LED Pilot Lamps
LED tail lights
Seat Opening Switch
Boot Light
Turn Signal Lamp Bulb Bulb
Alternator
Power Modes
Cruise Control
ABS Single Channel Single Channel
Body Type Sports Bikes Sports Naked Bikes, Commuter Bikes
Body Graphics
Starting Self Start Only Kick and Self Start
Seat Type Split Single
Pass Switch Yes Yes
Speedometer Digital Digital
Handle Type
Tachometer Analogue
Trip Meter Digital Digital
Charging point
Average Fuel economy
Digital Fuel Indicator
Distance to Empty
Low Fuel Warning Lamp Yes Yes
External Fuel Filling
Clock
Stand Alarm
Low Battery Indicator Yes Yes
Stepup Seat
Low Oil Indicator Yes
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights
Passenger Backrest
Carry hook
Underseat storage
Cooling System Oil Cooled Oil Cooled
Console Analogue and Digital Digital
Anti Theft Alarm
Shutter Lock
Odometer Digital Digital
Central Locking
Navigation
Mobile Connectivity No
EBS
Service Due Indicator
Switchable ABS
DRLs
Keyless Ignition
Standard Warranty (Years) 2
Standard Warranty (kilometers) 30000

Similar Bike Comparisons

Compare Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which one is best for daily Ride Yamaha FZ 25, Pulsar 220F or Apache RTR 160?
  • 220 is good.but u should go for fz 25 why because it has dual channel ABS. pulsar 220 has only single channel ABS. so the breaking performance is better than pulsar 220.pulsar 220 has its own style. and maintenance wise pulsar is pocket friendly. but the main problem is it's poor ground clearance.
  • Ofcourse 220 1.both stylish and practical use as good riding position for rider and pillion.2.Low maintenance as all parts locally made and distributed and performance is unmatchable
  • Pulsar 220f
View All Answers
Q. Which bike is better to buy right now, I need mileage, look, performance Pulsar 220F, Pulsar 150, TVS Apache RTR 160 4V, Apache RTR 200 4V?
  • If you compromise with mileage, then Apache RTR 200 4V is best performance, Safety bike and for looks and performance Pulsar 220f is good.
  • Pulsar 150
  • 220
Q. Which is the best Apache 160 4v or pulsar ns 160?
  • The Pulsar NS 160 ticks all the right boxes when it comes to style, performance, ride and handling, save for refinement. The new NS 160 is a worthy contender and makes a strong case for itself in this highly competitive 160cc segment. On the other hand, if a bike has to survive in the cut-throat 160cc two-wheeler segment, it needs to be competitively priced and pack enough performance to keep riders happy. Thankfully, the Apache RTR 160 4V delivers well on both fronts with class leading features and a price tag that starts at Rs 81,490 (ex-showroom for carb, single-disc variant). However, it doesn’t feel as confident under hard braking as the Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 or the Honda Hornet. That said, the Apache RTR 160 4V is not only the most refined RTR we have ridden till date but also one of the most refined 160cc motorcycles to be ever produced in India. Do take a test ride in order to judge your riding comfort.
  • The Pulsar NS 160 ticks all the right boxes when it comes to style, performance, ride and handling, save for refinement. The new NS 160 is a worthy contender and makes a strong case for itself in this highly competitive 160cc segment. On the other hand, if a bike has to survive in the cut-throat 160cc two-wheeler segment, it needs to be competitively priced and pack enough performance to keep riders happy. Thankfully, the Apache RTR 160 4V delivers well on both fronts with class leading features and a price tag that starts at Rs 81,490 (ex-showroom for carb, single-disc variant). However, it doesn’t feel as confident under hard braking as the Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 or the Honda Hornet. That said, the Apache RTR 160 4V is not only the most refined RTR we have ridden till date but also one of the most refined 160cc motorcycles to be ever produced in India. Do take a test ride in order to judge your riding comfort.
  • The Pulsar NS 160 ticks all the right boxes when it comes to style, performance, ride and handling, save for refinement. The new NS 160 is a worthy contender and makes a strong case for itself in this highly competitive 160cc segment. On the other hnad, if a bike has to survive in the cut-throat 160cc two-wheeler segment, it needs to be competitively priced and pack enough performance to keep riders happy. Thankfully, the Apache RTR 160 4V delivers well on both fronts with class leading features. However, it doesn’t feel as confident under hard braking as the Bajaj Pulsar NS 160. That said, the Apache RTR 160 4V is not only the most refined RTR we have ridden till date but also one of the most refined 160cc motorcycles to be ever produced in India. We would suggest you to take a test ride in order to clear your all doubts. Click on the given link to get your nearest dealership details: https://www.zigwheels.com/bikes/dealers
View All Answers
View More Questions