Orxa Mantis vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650

Last Updated: August 9, 2026

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 price starts at Rs. 3.53 Lakh, which is Rs. 6,895 cheaper than the base variant of Orxa Mantis, priced at Rs. 3.60 Lakh. In terms of efficiency, the Continental GT 650 returns a claimed 27 kmpl, while the Mantis offers a claimed 221 km/charge. On the performance front, the Mantis uses a 8.9Kwh battery and the Continental GT 650 a 647.95cc engine producing 47.4 PS @ 7150 rpm. If you're deciding between the Mantis and Continental GT 650, the Mantis is the better pick for a lighter kerb weight, while the Continental GT 650 stands out for affordability.

...Read More

Mantis vs Continental GT 650 Comparison Summary

Specification Orxa MantisRoyal Enfield Continental GT 650
Ex-showroom price (base) Rs. 3.60 LakhRs. 3.53 Lakh
Mileage / Range 221 km/charge27 kmpl
Engine / Battery 8.9 Kwh647.95 cc
Max power / Motor Not Available47.4 PS @ 7150 rpm
Kerb weight 182 Kg214 Kg

Mantis vs Continental GT 650 Key Highlights

Basic Info Orxa Energies Mantis STDRoyal Enfield Continental GT 650 Standard
Rating
5 reviews
536 reviews
Brand Name Orxa Energies Royal Enfield
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 3.60 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 3.53 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type Not Available Inline Twin Cylinder, 4 Stroke, SOHC
Max Power Not Available 47.4 PS @ 7150 rpm
Fuel Type Electric Petrol
Colors
Orxa Energies Mantis Colors
Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 Colors
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-457.2 mm,Rear :-457.2 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Spoke
Range 221 km/charge Not Available
ABS Single Channel Dual Channel
Starting Push Button Start Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Analogue
Running Cost Rs. 0.26/km Rs. 3.70/km
EMI Not Available
Rs. 9,668 @ 6% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 23,084 Mantis Insurance Rs. 21,628 Continental GT 650 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Spark Plugs
Not Available
1 Per Cylinder
Valves (per cylinder)
Not Available
4
Claimed Top Speed
135 km/Hr
170 kmph
Emission Norm Compliance
Not Available
bs6.2
Wheel Torque
27.87 PS
Not Available
Motor Torque
93 Nm
Not Available
Flex Fuel Blend
Not Available
E20
Engine Type
Not Available
Inline Twin Cylinder, 4 Stroke, SOHC
Engine Displacement
Not Available
647.95 cc
Gear Box
Not Available
6 Speed
Max Power
Not Available
47.4 PS @ 7150 rpm
Max Torque
Not Available
52.3 Nm @ 5150 rpm
Bore
Not Available
78 mm
Stroke
Not Available
67.8 mm
Number Of Cylinders
Not Available
2
Drive Type
Belt Drive
Chain Drive
Battery Warranty
3 Years or 30,000 Km
Not Available
Motor Warranty
3 Years, 30000 km Years
Not Available
Fuel System
Not Available
Fuel Injection
Fuel Type
Electric
Petrol
Ignition
Not Available
Digital Spark Ignition
Compression Ratio
Not Available
9.5:1

Front Brake
Disc
Disc
Rear Brake
Disc
Disc
Front Caliper
Not Available
2 Piston
Rear Caliper
Not Available
1 Piston

Mileage (Overall)
Not Available
27 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
8.9s
Not Available
Estimated Mileage
Not Available
25-30 kmpl
Fuel Gauge
Not Available
Digital

Suspension-Front
41 mm telescopic forks
41 mm front fork, Travel - 110 mm
Suspension-Rear
Hydraulic mono-shock with adjustable preload
Coil-over shocks, Travel - 88 mm

Front Tyre Pressure (Rider)
Not Available
32 psi
Front Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
Not Available
32 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider)
Not Available
36 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
Not Available
39 psi
Tyre Size
Front :-110/70-R17, Rear :- 130/70-R17
Front :-100/90-18, Rear :-130/70-18
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-457.2 mm,Rear :-457.2 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tube
Radial Tyre
Not Available
Yes
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Spoke

Seat height
815 mm
804 mm
Fuel Tank Reserve Capacity
Not Available
1.5 L
Gross Weight
Not Available
400 kg
Length*Width*Height
Not Available
2119*780*1067 mm3
Wheelbase
1450 mm
1398 mm
Length
Not Available
2119 mm
Ground Clearance
180 mm
174 mm
Height
Not Available
1067 mm
Width
Not Available
780 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity
Not Available
12.5 L
Kerb Weight
182 Kg
214 Kg
Tail Light
LED
Bulb
Front Brake Size
320 mm
320 mm
Rear Brake Size
230 mm
240 mm

Battery Type
Li-ion
Not Available
Motor Type
BLDC
Not Available
Motor Power
20.5 kW
Not Available
Claimed range
221 km/charge
Not Available
Tested range
221 km/charge
Not Available
Call/SMS Alerts
Yes
Not Available
Roadside assistance
Not Available
Yes
Range (Mode 1)
150 Km/charge
Not Available
Range
221 km/charge
Not Available
Fast Charging
Yes
Not Available
Headlight
LED
LED
Fast Charging Time
2.5 Hours ( 0-80% )
Not Available
Battery Capacity
8.9 Kwh
12V / 12AH
Projector head light
Yes
Not Available
Charging Time(0-80%)
2.5
Not Available

Frame Type
All-aluminium aerospace-grade alloy frame and subframe
Steel Tubular, Double Cradle Frame
Malfunction Indicator
Not Available
Yes
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Calls and Messaging
Yes
Not Available
Navigation assist
Yes
Not Available
Kill Switch
Not Available
Yes
Low battery alert
Yes
Yes
No. of Tripmeters
Not Available
2
Rear Footpegs
Yes
Yes
OTA Updates
Yes
Not Available
Daytime Running Lamps
Yes
Not Available
Additional Features/Information
Proprietary Orxa Ride-By-Wire, Proprietary Orxa BMS, Linux-based Orxa operating system
Not Available
Gear Position Indicator
Not Available
Yes
ABS Type
Single Channel
Dual Channel
Side Stand Warning
Yes
Yes
Exhaust Heat Shield
Not Available
Yes
ABS
Single Channel
Dual Channel
Body Type
Sports Naked Bikes, Electric Bikes, Sports Bikes
Cafe Racer Bikes
Body Graphics
Not Available
Yes
Instrument Console Type
Digital
Analogue and Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
Bluetooth
Not Available
Internet Connectivity
Yes
Not Available
Starting
Push Button Start
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Split
Operating System
Linux based Orxa OS
Not Available
Pass Beam Switch
Not Available
Yes
Speedometer
Digital
Analogue
Mobile Application
Yes
Not Available
Tachometer
Not Available
Analogue
Gradeability
Not Available
24°
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Not Available
Yes
Clock
Digital
Not Available
Low Battery Indicator
Yes
Yes
Low Oil Indicator
Not Available
Yes
Charger Output
1300 W
Not Available
Cooling System
Liquid Cooled
Air Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
Yes
Not Available
Saree Guard
Not Available
Yes
Hazard Light Switch
Not Available
Yes

1st Service
Not Available
500 Kms/45 Days
2nd Service
Not Available
5000 Kms/180 Days
3rd Service
Not Available
10000 Kms/365 Days
4th Service
Not Available
15000 Kms/550 Days
Air Filter Service Cost
No
Not Available
Spark Plug Service Cost
No
Not Available

Vehicle Warranty
3 Years or 30,000 Km
3 Years or 40,000 Km
Standard Warranty (Years)
3
3
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
30000
40000

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Royal Enfield Continental GT 650
  • Classic retro styling appeals to many
  • Not-too-aggressive riding posture
  • Great handling & nice exhaust note
Royal Enfield Continental GT 650
  • Could have better brakes
  • Clutch is on slightly heavier side
  • Customization options are limited

Is Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 Better Than Orxa Energies Mantis?

50% users have chosen Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 over Orxa Energies Mantis in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 1176 users have also rated Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 and Orxa Energies Mantis on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
Orxa Energies Mantis has out rated Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 on all the rating factors.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Mantis Continental GT 650
Comfort 4.3 5.0
Features 4.2 5.0
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Review and Win Banner

Latest News on Orxa Energies Mantis and Royal Enfield Continental GT 650

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which bike is better, TVS Apache RR 310 or Royal Enfield Continental GT 650?
  • Selecting between the Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 and TVS Apache RR 310 would depend on certain factors such as your budget, preference of the segment, performance figures, features required, etc. The Continental GT 650 is a fun to ride cafe racer. The GT’s sporty riding position makes it much more suitable for twisty mountain roads and even high-speed straight-line blasts. To top things off, the twin-cylinder motor provides the performance and refinement that the 535 simply couldn’t. On the other hand, TVS has done an incredible job in ironing out the sore spots of the Apache RR 310 with the BS6 update. It is loaded with tech, making it the most technologically advanced motorcycle in its class. The new prices are quite close to its fiercest rival -- the KTM RC 390. While it may lack the outright performance of the RC 390, the Apache RR 310 BS6 makes up for it by being a well-rounded machine that can do daily duties as well as corner carving or even touring, for that matter. For a better understanding of compatibility and riding comfort, we would suggest you take a test ride. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership.
Q. Which one is better Himalayan or GT 650
  • Both Royal Enfield Himalayan and Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 are brilliant options, however, selecting one would depend on certain factors such as your budget, preference of the segment, usage of the bike, features requirement, etc. The Himalayan BS6 is a well-rounded package which is now just that little bit better than before. The Himalayan certainly isn’t flawless or entirely satisfactory in any singular aspect, but it makes up for these gaps by painting a picture of opportunity, inciting you to travel and explore on a whim. On the other hand, the GT’s sporty riding position makes it much more suitable for twisty mountain roads and even high-speed straight-line blasts. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride for a better understanding of performance and comfort. Click on the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
Q. Which is best to buy between continental gt 650 or royal enfield interceptor 650
  • Selecting between the Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 and Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 would depend on certain factors such as your budget, preference of the segment, performance figures, features required, etc. The Continental GT 650 is a fun to ride cafe racer. The GT’s sporty riding position makes it much more suitable for twisty mountain roads and even high-speed straight-line blasts. To top things off, the twin-cylinder motor provides the performance and refinement that the 535 simply couldn’t. On the other hand, if you are not on a limited budget, then you may definitely opt for the Interceptor 650. The bike offers a brilliant engine with loads of torque from the get-go and a nice soundtrack accompanying it. Quality and fit and finish levels are quite good and the motorcycle feels built to last. On top of that, the Interceptor 650 is the most affordable multi-cylinder bike in India. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership.
|Orxa Mantis Community

Orxa Energies Mantis Vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 FAQs

Which bike is best between Orxa Energies Mantis vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650?
Orxa Mantis has out rated Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 on all the rating factors.
Which bike is cheaper Orxa Energies Mantis vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650?
The Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 is cheaper than Orxa Mantis by ₹6,895.

Images of Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 and Orxa Mantis

Which one do you like more?
Mantis
Mantis
Continental GT 650
Continental GT 650
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Orxa Mantis vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650
×