Atumobile AtumVader vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Last Updated: September 26, 2026

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 price starts at Rs. 1.38 Lakh, which is Rs. 8,360 cheaper than the base variant of Atumobile AtumVader, priced at Rs. 1.46 Lakh. In terms of efficiency, the Hunter 350 returns a claimed 36.2 kmpl, while the AtumVader offers a claimed 100 km/charge. On the performance front, the AtumVader uses a 2.9Kwh battery producing 2.9 kW and the Hunter 350 a 349cc engine producing 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm. If you're deciding between the AtumVader and Hunter 350, the AtumVader is the better pick for a lighter kerb weight, while the Hunter 350 stands out for affordability.

...Read More

AtumVader vs Hunter 350 Comparison Summary

Specification Atumobile AtumVaderRoyal Enfield Hunter 350
Ex-showroom price (base) Rs. 1.46 LakhRs. 1.38 Lakh
Mileage / Range 100 km/charge36.2 kmpl
Engine / Battery 2.9 Kwh349 cc
Max power / Motor 2.9 kW20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Kerb weight 114 Kg177 Kg

AtumVader vs Hunter 350 Key Highlights

Basic Info Atumobile AtumVader SRoyal Enfield Hunter 350 Base
Rating
6 reviews
859 reviews
Brand Name Atumobile Royal Enfield
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.46 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 1.38 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type Not Available Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled
Max Power 2.9 kW 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Fuel Type Electric Petrol
Colors
Atumobile AtumVader Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
Braking Type Combi Brake System Anti-lock Braking System
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-17 Inch,Rear :-17 Inch
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Spoke Spoke
Range 100 km/charge Not Available
Charging Time 4 Hr Not Available
ABS Not Available Single Channel
Starting Push Button Start Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Analogue
Running Cost Rs. 0.19/km Rs. 2.76/km
EMI Not Available
Rs. 3,965 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 19,965 AtumVader Insurance Rs. 11,005 Hunter 350 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Spark Plugs
Not Available
1 Per Cylinder
Valves (per cylinder)
Not Available
2
Claimed Top Speed
65 km/Hr
114 kmph
Emission Norm Compliance
Not Available
bs6.2
Motor Torque
110 Nm
Not Available
Flex Fuel Blend
Not Available
E20
Engine Type
Not Available
Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled
Engine Displacement
Not Available
349 cc
Gear Box
Not Available
5 Speed
Max Power
2.9 kW
20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Max Torque
Not Available
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Bore
Not Available
72 mm
Stroke
Not Available
85.8 mm
Number Of Cylinders
Not Available
1
Drive Type
Not Available
Chain Drive
Fuel System
Not Available
Electronic Injection
Fuel Type
Electric
Petrol
Ignition
Not Available
Electronic Fuel Injection
Compression Ratio
Not Available
9.5 : 1

Front Brake
Drum
Disc
Rear Brake
Drum
Drum
Front Caliper
Not Available
2 Piston
Rear Caliper
Not Available
1 Piston
Braking Type
Combi Brake System
Anti-lock Braking System

Mileage (Overall)
Not Available
36.2 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
Not Available
16.40s
Braking 60-0 km/h
Not Available
18.13m
Braking 80-0 km/h
Not Available
32.08m
Braking 100-0 km/h
Not Available
52.68m
Estimated Mileage
Not Available
35-40 kmpl
Roll-ons 30-70 kmph (3rd Gear)
Not Available
6.47s
Roll-ons 40-80 kmph (4th Gear)
Not Available
8.87s
Fuel Gauge
Not Available
Digital

Rear Suspension Preload Adjustment
Not Available
Yes
Rear Suspension Travel / Wheel Travel
Not Available
100 mm
Suspension-Front
Telescopic, 31mm Conventional Fork
Telescopic, 41mm forks
Suspension-Rear
Telescopic, 31mm Conventional Fork
Twin shock absorbers with 6-step adjustable preload

Front Tyre Pressure (Rider)
30 psi
29 psi
Front Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
Not Available
29 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider)
33 psi
32 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
Not Available
33 psi
Brake Fluid Grade
Not Available
DOT4
Tyre Size
Front :-100/90-17 Rear :-100/90-17
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-17 Inch,Rear :-17 Inch
Tyre Make
Not Available
CEAT
Tyre Type
Tube
Tube
Radial Tyre
Not Available
Yes
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Spoke
Spoke

Seat height
800 mm
790 mm
Load carrying capacity
Not Available
179 kg
Fuel Tank Reserve Capacity
Not Available
2.6 L
Gross Weight
194 kg
360 kg
Engine Oil Capacity
Not Available
2.2 L
Engine Oil Grade
Not Available
SAE 15W 50 API SL grade JASO MA2 semi synthetic
Length*Width*Height
2068*781*1220 mm3
2055*810*1070 mm3
Wheelbase
1355 mm
1370 mm
Length
2068 mm
2055 mm
Ground Clearance
227 mm
160 mm
Height
1220 mm
1070 mm
Width
781 mm
810 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity
Not Available
13 L
Kerb Weight
114 Kg
177 Kg
Tail Light
LED
Bulb
Front Brake Size
130 mm
300 mm
Rear Brake Size
130 mm
153 mm

Battery Type
Li-ion
Lead Acid
Motor Type
BLDC
Not Available
Motor Power
1.5 kW
Not Available
Claimed range
100 km/charge
Not Available
Call/SMS Alerts
Yes
Not Available
Roadside assistance
Not Available
Optional
USB charging port
Not Available
Type C
Music control
Yes
Not Available
Conventional Charging Time
4 Hours
Not Available
Range (Mode 1)
100 km/charge
Not Available
Range
100 km/charge
Not Available
Headlight
LED with AHO
Halogen
Charging at Home
Yes
Not Available
Battery Capacity
2.9 Kwh
12V / 8AH
Charging Time
4 Hr
Not Available

Cruise Control
Yes
Not Available
Frame Type
Not Available
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
Digital Display Type
Not Available
LCD
Malfunction Indicator
Not Available
Yes
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Pillion Seat
Not Available
Yes
Pillion Grab Rail
Not Available
Yes
Calls and Messaging
Yes
Not Available
Navigation assist
Yes
Not Available
Riding Modes
Yes
Yes
Kill Switch
Yes
Yes
Low battery alert
Yes
Yes
No. of Tripmeters
Not Available
3
Rear Footpegs
Not Available
Yes
Multi-function Lock
Not Available
Yes
Additional Features/Information
Riding Mode - Eco | Drive | Sport | Reverse, Charger Cut Off Sensor, Combination Switch, Brake Lever Cut Off Switches, Battery Charging Percentage
Wet sump, forced lubrication, Paper element Air Cleaner
Gear Position Indicator
Not Available
Yes
ABS Type
Not Available
Single Channel
Distance To Empty
Yes
Not Available
Side Stand Warning
Yes
Yes
Physical Key
Not Available
Yes
Exhaust Heat Shield
Not Available
Yes
Front Footpegs
Not Available
Forward-set
Body
Not Available
Metal
Reverse Assist
Yes
Not Available
Instrument Cluster Control Switchcube
Not Available
Yes
ABS
Not Available
Single Channel
Body Type
Electric Bikes, Cafe Racer Bikes
Roadster Bikes
Instrument Console Type
Digital
Analogue and Digital
Starting
Push Button Start
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Single
Pass Beam Switch
Not Available
Yes
Speedometer
Digital
Analogue
Gradeability
7 Degree
Not Available
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Not Available
Yes
Clock
Yes
Yes
Low Battery Indicator
Yes
Yes
Low Oil Indicator
Not Available
Yes
Underseat storage
14 L
Not Available
Charger Output
15 Amp.
Not Available
Cooling System
Not Available
Air & Oil Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
Yes
Not Available
Service Due Indicator
Not Available
Yes
Saree Guard
Not Available
Yes
Shift Light
Not Available
Yes
Hazard Light Switch
Not Available
Yes

1st Service
Not Available
500kms/45 days
2nd Service
Not Available
5000kms/180 days
3rd Service
Not Available
10000kms/360 days
4th Service
Not Available
15000kms/540 days

Vehicle Warranty
Not Available
3 Years or 30,000 Km
Standard Warranty (Years)
Not Available
3
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
Not Available
30000

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • Offering easy accessibility
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well
  • Absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity

Is Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Better Than Atumobile AtumVader?

50% users have chosen Royal Enfield Hunter 350 over Atumobile AtumVader in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 1340 users have also rated Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Atumobile AtumVader on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 has out rated Atumobile AtumVader on all the rating factors.

Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor AtumVader Hunter 350
Mileage 3.9 3.7
Performance 4.4 3.3
Comfort 4.5 3.7
Maintenance 3.8 3.7
Features 4.4 3.0
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Ad

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.

Atumobile AtumVader Vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 FAQs

Which bike is best between Atumobile AtumVader vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 has out rated Atumobile AtumVader on all the rating factors.
Which bike is cheaper Atumobile AtumVader vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is cheaper than Atumobile AtumVader by ₹8,360.
Which bike offers better performance Atumobile AtumVader vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
As per the users experiences the Atumobile AtumVader has better performance.

Images of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Atumobile AtumVader

  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Atumobile AtumVader vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350
×