Ather Rizta vs Komaki TN-95

Last Updated: September 5, 2026

Ather Rizta price starts at Rs. 1.18 Lakh, which is Rs. 226 cheaper than the base variant of Komaki TN-95, priced at Rs. 1.19 Lakh. In terms of range, the Rizta offers a claimed 123 km/charge, while the TN-95 delivers 130-150 km/charge. On the performance front, the Rizta uses a 2.9 Kwh battery and the TN-95 a 3.26 Kwh battery. If you're deciding between the Rizta and TN-95, the TN-95 is the better pick for range and charging time, while the Rizta stands out for affordability.

...Read More

Rizta vs TN-95 Comparison Summary

Specification Ather RiztaKomaki TN-95
Ex-showroom price (base) Rs. 1.18 LakhRs. 1.19 Lakh
Range 123 km/charge130-150 km/charge
Battery capacity 2.9 Kwh3.26 Kwh
Charging time 5.45 Hr4-5 Hr
Kerb weight 125 KgNot Available

Rizta vs TN-95 Key Highlights

Basic Info Ather Rizta S (IDC 123 Km) MonoKomaki TN-95 Sport - Classic
Rating
42 reviews
8 reviews
Brand Name Ather Komaki
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.18 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 1.19 Lakh Check On Road Price
Fuel Type Electric Electric
Colors
Ather Energy Rizta Colors
Komaki TN-95 Colors
Braking Type Combi Brake System Not Available
Wheel Size Front :-304 mm,Rear :-304 mm Not Available
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
Range 123 km/charge 130-150 km/charge
Charging Time 5.45 Hr 4-5 Hr
Starting Push Button Start Remote Start,Push Button Start
Speedometer Digital Digital
Insurance Rs. 6,873 Rizta Insurance Rs. 4,354 TN-95 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Claimed Top Speed
80 km/Hr
85 km/Hr
Motor Torque
22 Nm
Not Available
Motor Waterproofing Rating
IP67
Not Available
Charger Warranty
3 Years
1 Year
No. Of Batteries
1
1
Drive Type
Belt Drive
Hub Motor
Battery Warranty
3 Years or 30,000 Km
3 Years or 30,000 Km
Motor Warranty
Not Available
3 Years Years
Fuel Type
Electric
Electric

Front Brake
Disc
Disc
Rear Brake
Drum
Disc
Braking Type
Combi Brake System
Not Available

0-40 Kmph (sec)
4.7s
Not Available
Acceleration 0-40 kmph (sec)
4.7s
Not Available
Scooter Speed
high
high

Suspension-Front
Telescopic
Not Available
Suspension-Rear
Monoshock
Not Available

Tyre Size
Front :-: 90/90-12, Rear :-100/80-12
Not Available
Wheel Size
Front :-304 mm,Rear :-304 mm
Not Available
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy

Seat height
780 mm
Not Available
Front Storage Compartment
Not Available
Yes
Length*Width*Height
1850*750*1140 mm3
Not Available
Wheelbase
1285 mm
Not Available
Length
1850 mm
2020 mm
Ground Clearance
150 mm
Not Available
Height
1140 mm
1215 mm
Width
750 mm
Not Available
Kerb Weight
125 Kg
Not Available
Tail Light
LED
LED
Front Brake Size
200 mm
Not Available
Rear Brake Size
130 mm
Not Available

Battery Type
Li-ion
Li-ion
Motor Type
PMSM
Not Available
Motor Power
4.3 kW
Not Available
Claimed range
123 km/charge
130-150 km/charge
Charging network / Battery swapping network
Yes
Not Available
Call/SMS Alerts
Yes
Yes
Roadside assistance
Yes
Not Available
Anti-theft alert
Yes
Not Available
USB charging port
Yes
Not Available
Music control
Yes
Not Available
Conventional Charging Time
5 Hours 45 Minutes
4 Hours - 5 Hours
Range
123 km/charge
130-150 km/charge
Headlight
LED
LED
Charging at Home
Yes
Yes
Battery Capacity
2.9 Kwh
3.26 Kwh
Charging Time
5.45 Hr
4-5 Hr
Charging Time(0-80%)
6 Hrs 30 Min
Not Available
Seat Opening Switch
Yes
Not Available

Digital Display Type
DeepView
TFT
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Vehicle Location Tracking
Yes
Not Available
Pillion Seat
Yes
Yes
Pillion Grab Rail
Yes
Yes
Calls and Messaging
Yes
Yes
Navigation assist
Yes
Yes
Riding Modes
Yes
Yes
Low battery alert
Yes
Yes
Brightness Control
Yes
Not Available
Rear Footpegs
Yes
Yes
OTA Updates
Yes
Not Available
Multi-function Lock
Yes
Not Available
Daytime Running Lamps
Yes
Yes
Additional Features/Information
Riding Modes - Default | Eco | SmartEco, Side Stand Motor Cut-Off, 400 mm Water Wading Limit, Auto Hold, Auto Indicator Cut-Off, Guide-Me-Home Lights, FallSafe, Emergency Stop Signal (Dashboard - 8GB Storage, 1 GB RAM, 4G LTE, GNSS with AGPS), (Ather Connect - Tow Notifications, Find My Scooter, Ride Stories, Push Navigation, Alexa Skills)
Riding Modes - Eco I Sport I Turbo, Parking Assist
Distance To Empty
Yes
Not Available
Side Stand Warning
Yes
Not Available
Reverse Assist
Yes
Yes
Telematics
Yes
Not Available
Body Type
Electric Scooters
Electric Scooters
Instrument Console Type
Digital
Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
Bluetooth
Bluetooth
Internet Connectivity
Yes
Not Available
Starting
Push Button Start
Remote Start,Push Button Start
Seat Type
Single
Single
Operating System
Real Time OS
Not Available
Pass Beam Switch
Yes
Yes
Processor
Cortex Series
Not Available
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Mobile Application
Yes
Not Available
Charging Station Locator
Yes
Not Available
Gradeability
15°
Not Available
Clock
Yes
Yes
Low Battery Indicator
Yes
Yes
Passenger Backrest
Yes
Yes
Carry hook
Yes
Not Available
Underseat storage
34 L
Yes
External Speakers
Not Available
Yes
Charger Output
350 W
Not Available
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
Yes
Yes
Service Due Indicator
Yes
Not Available
Keyless Ignition
Not Available
Yes
Hazard Light Switch
Yes
Not Available

Vehicle Warranty
3 Years or 30,000 Km
Not Available
Standard Warranty (Years)
3
Not Available
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
30000
Not Available

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Ather Rizta
  • 34-litres of underseat storage can easily hold a 15-inch laptop bag
  • Massive seat has enough space for even the largest riders and pillions
  • Gets lots of cool features such as Google Maps navigation
  • WhatsApp alerts
  • Skid Control and much more
Ather Rizta
  • Smart Eco mode feels a bit underpowered and struggles on inclines
  • Design can seem a bit boring to younger buyers
  • Ride quality could have been more plush

Is Komaki TN-95 Better Than Ather Rizta?

100% users have chosen Komaki TN-95 over Ather Rizta in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 83 users have also rated Komaki TN-95 and Ather Rizta on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Komaki TN-95 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for features in your bike. But Ather Rizta is better on the grounds of mileage, performance, comfort and maintenance.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Rizta TN-95
Mileage 3.6 4.2
Performance 3.7 4.2
Comfort 3.7 4.8
Maintenance 3.7 4.1
Features 4.0 3.9
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Videos of Ather Energy Rizta and Komaki TN-95

Review and Win Banner

Ather Rizta Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Ather Energy Rizta and Komaki TN-95

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which variant of TN-95 is best to buy?
  • Komaki TN-95 is offered in 1 variant - TN-95 STD which comes at a price tag of Rs. 98,000 (Ex-Showroom, Delhi).

Ather Energy Rizta Vs Komaki TN-95 FAQs

Which bike is best between Ather Energy Rizta vs Komaki TN-95?
As per the users experiences Ather Rizta is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage, performance, comfort and maintenance in your bike. But Komaki TN-95 is better on the grounds of features.
Which bike is cheaper Ather Energy Rizta vs Komaki TN-95?
The Ather Rizta is cheaper than Komaki TN-95 by ₹226.
Which bike offers better performance Ather Energy Rizta vs Komaki TN-95?
As per the users experiences the Ather Rizta has better performance.

Images of Ather Rizta and Komaki TN-95

Which one do you like more?
Rizta
Rizta
TN-95
TN-95
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Ather Rizta vs Komaki TN-95
×