Honda Hornet 2.0 mileage

Honda Hornet 2.0 Mileage

The mileage of Honda Hornet 2.0 is 55.77 kmpl. This is the claimed ARAI mileage for all the variants of Hornet 2.0. The claimed ARAI mileage of Hornet 2.0 Petrol Manual is 55.77 kmpl.

ARAI Claimed 55.77 kmpl

User Reported
This is the mileage given by maximum number of Hornet 2.0 owners
44 kmpl

Honda Hornet 2.0 2024 Brochure

Download brochure for detailed information of specifications, features & variants prices

Download Brochure

Honda Hornet 2.0

4.2 734 user reviews

Rs. 1.39 Lakh

View May Offers

Hornet 2.0 Running Cost

Monthly Fuel Cost	Rs. 2727 / 1500km
Daily Fuel Cost	Rs. 90 / 50km
Per KM Fuel Cost	Rs. 1.82

The Hornet 2.0 has a running cost of Rs. 1.82 per kilometer and a monthly fuel cost of Rs. 2727, assuming a daily run of 50 kilometers and Petrol at Rs. 100 per liter.

Calculate Fuel Cost For Your Hornet 2.0

Mileage

Fuel Cost(Rs.)

KM driven per day 50 km/day

20
30
40
50
80
100
other

Monthly Fuel Cost for Hornet 2.0

Rs. 0

Honda Hornet 2.0 Expert Reviews

2021 TVS Apache RTR 200 4V vs Bajaj Pulsar NS200 BS6 vs Honda Hornet 2.0: Battle Of The 200cc Nakeds
17 Mar, 2021 | By Team ZigWheels
Honda Hornet 2.0 Road Test Review
30 Nov, 2020 | By Team ZigWheels

Related Questions

Q. What does tool symbol mean which appear in meter console?

Dillip | 3 years ago

The spanner symbol starts blinking when the service of your vehicle becomes due. The icon is service reminder and tells you that your vehicle is due for service.

4 Reply

Q. WHICH IS BETTER YAMAHA MT15, HORNET OR GIXXER IN 155 TO 160 CC?

Dillip | 3 years ago

Among the lot, we would suggest you to opt for the Suzuki Gixxer as in the 150cc streetfighter segment, the Gixxer continues to provide one of the best all-round packages in this class, coming very close to the Apache RTR 160 4V. It features a muscular design and has brilliant handling characteristics. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT 15 looks sharp, is light, and can be a hoot to commute. A powerful 155cc engine combined with its lightweight and compact design makes it a great two-wheeler. However, the compact riding posture might be a bit too tight for large riders. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride for a better understanding of comfort and compatibility. You may click on the link and select your desired city for dealership details.

2 Reply

Q. Which is better among Yamaha MT 15 and Honda Hornet 2.0?

Dillip | 3 years ago

Selecting between the Yamaha MT 15 and Honda Hornet would depend on certain factors such as budget, preference of the segment, features required, preference of the performance and usage of the bike. If you are looking for a 180cc bike with linear power delivery, healthy mid-range torque, comfortable riding position and a refined engine, the Honda Hornet 2.0 would be a better option. On the other hand, if you are powerful 155cc bike with outright performance, compact design, great agility and brilliant looks then you may opt for the Yamaha MT 15. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride for a better understanding of comfort and compatibility. You may click on the link and select your desired city for dealership details.Read More: - Yamaha MT-15 Road Test Review - Do The Hornet 2.0’s Rivals Have What It Takes To Stir Its Nest?

5 Reply

Q. I am planning to buy a bike next month. I am confused between Apache rtr 160 4v, Hornet 2.0, Honda Unicorn and FZ/S-Fi V3,. Which one should I buy if my priorities are low maintenance cost, good mileage and good riding quality (comfort and handling). I will be commuting to office daily with frequent rides to native village which has bumpy/rural roads with this.

Kshitij | 3 years ago

@ Dillip | All these bikes are good enough and easy for pocket to maintain. The TVS Apache RTR 160 4V has been the benchmark when it comes to 160cc motorcycles. With the BS6-compliant iteration, TVS has made sure it is still as sprightly as ever despite the slight drop in power and torque figures. The overall package and reasonable pricing make it a truly value for money motorcycle in its segment. In nearly every aspect, except maybe ergonomics and braking, the Yamaha FZS-FI v3.0 fails to impress. While its motor offers better fuel efficiency compared to the previous-gen model, it lacks grunt. If you have around Rs 1 lakh to invest, you're better off with other options. if you are looking for better power performance, build quality, good features and a more stable bike, you may go for Hornet 2.0. It is comfortable enough and gets a refined and smooth engine too. If we talk about Honda Unicorn, it has always been the go-to bike if you were planning to buy a 150cc commuter. The BS6 update has given the bike a larger motor, while retaining the dynamics of the older bike. It still remains a well-rounded motorcycle, but the BS6 update has come with a hefty price hike.You may compare all these bikes accordingly. Do take a test ride in order to get better clarity. Check out authorised dealership details.

I have a similar requirement as yours (in the question), and have test-ridden hero Xtreme 160R, as well; along with the options mentioned above, this is what I noted. With the reviews and verdicts from almost every major auto channel, it was an obvious run. To my surprise, I couldn't find the 'sporty' (rear set foot-pegs) on the Apache RTR 160 4v as comfortable as other bikes - however, TVS's offering was the best in the segment, before the BS6 norms pushed in, due to lower kerb weight and the power figures. The ride quality and handling are superb, plus a decent fuel economy is a pro.Given that I found the ride a bit too tiring for my wrists, and a Honda showroom was next in line, I drove the Hornet 2.0. You hop on to its saddle, and you feel a certain correction in the posture - an upright, wide handlebar setting, with mildly rear-set footpegs, make you stay easy, even at higher speeds - the suspension setup is on the firm side though - the higher cost and the lower fuel economy are the only cons that I could measure at the moment.Next, Hero extreme 160R was a similar offering, just with a refined but slightly weaker engine than the Hornet 2.0 - you miss the pull from the engine to go up and rev it higher - the bike is nimble and a very capable handler of bad roads too. Fuel economy is quite similar to TVS's just the braking improves with the lower weight figures.For the final option, I went in to drive the FZ-S V3 - It was a DELIGHT - you sit even more so relaxed than on any of the previous bikes, and the ride quality is plush! Given that I was riding it right after the previous two, the motor felt far too refined for even the Hornet to match. Better economy and festive deals made it a better choice for me - given the quality, comfort being better than what I had tested and the cost was considerably lower than the other options.The only question that I have in mind is 'How long is the FZ going to continue in India?'; given that spare parts vanish out of Indian markets, as soon as the bike is discontinued.In my opinion, if you prefer an easy-riding style and economy and comfort are a priority, go with Yamaha's 'Lord of The Streets'. Hornet 2.0 also makes a better option if the budget allows, too.

12 Reply

Kshitij | 3 years ago

I have a similar requirement as yours (in the question), and have test-ridden hero Xtreme 160R, as well; along with the options mentioned above. With the reviews and verdicts from almost every major auto channel, it was an obvious run. To my surprise, I couldn't find the 'sporty' (rear set foot-pegs) on the Apache RTR 160 4v as comfortable as other bikes - however, TVS's offering was the best in the segment, before the BS6 norms pushed in, due to lower kerb weight and the power figures. The ride quality and handling are superb, plus a decent fuel economy is a pro. Given that I found the ride a bit too tiring for my wrists, and a Honda showroom was next in line, I drove the Hornet 2.0. You hop on to its saddle, and you feel a certain correction in the posture - an upright, wide handlebar setting, with mildly rear-set footpegs, make you stay easy, even at higher speeds - the suspension setup is on the firm side though - the higher cost and the lower fuel economy are the only cons that I could measure at the moment. Next, Hero extreme 160R was a similar offering, just with a refined but slightly weaker engine than the Hornet 2.0 - you miss the pull from the engine to go up and rev it higher - the bike is nimble and a very capable handler of bad roads too. Fuel economy is quite similar to TVS's just the braking improves with the lower weight figures.For the final option, I went in to drive the FZ-S V3 - It was a DELIGHT - you sit even more so relaxed than on any of the previous bikes, and the ride quality is plush! Given that I was riding it right after the previous two, the motor felt far too refined for even the Hornet to match. Better economy and festive deals made it a better choice for me - given the quality, comfort being better than what I had tested and the cost was considerably lower than the other options.The only question that I have in mind is 'How long is the FZ going to continue in India?'; given that spare parts vanish out of Indian markets, as soon as the bike is discontinued.In my opinion, if you prefer an easy-riding style and economy and comfort are a priority, go with Yamaha's 'Lord of The Streets'. Hornet 2.0 also makes a better option if the budget allows, too.

0 Reply

Have a Question about Honda Hornet 2.0?

300+ Answers from Experts & Owners

Search your question about Hornet 2.0 E.g - Which variant of Hornet 2.0 is best to buy?

Honda Hornet 2.0 User Reviews

4.2/5

Based on 315 reviews & 419 rating

Write & win ₹ 2000

All
Mileage (68)
Looks (52)
Engine (37)
Comfort (36)
Experience (35)
Performance (29)
Service (19)
Pickup (19)
Price (17)
Seat (17)
Power (16)

Power pehle

I own this bike hornet 2.0.Its such a power packed machine and you never get bored by riding on it.

0

Share
4.6

Bike in this segment is so

Bike in this segment is so powerful and pick up is excellent and the mileage is affordable by every middle class person.

0

Share
Good meilage

Good machine and good meilage very comfort but back mono suspension very hard.Seat comfort not good all overall not a good.

0

Share
Amazing Experience

Hornet 160 r is the best among its segment and still it gives a mileage of 46+ km in city in highway if we go within160 kmph it would give a mileage of 50+ and it's very sporty look and good all over but the gears are little1bit tight for shifting when the chain is dirty

0

Share
Mostly recommend this bike

Mostly recommend this bike for better ride best mileage and best feeling like riders

0

Share
Gsfaa aeweEW AEAWEae EEWDxzrrsr

Gsfaa aeweew aeaweae eewdxzrrsr ra arar arara rrra rsfzfes

0

Share
Service machanical wast of

Service machanical wast of chengalpattu honda showroom

0

Share
Good pick up and average

Good pick up and average and control' is very good

0

Share
Hornet 2.0 User Reviews

Hornet 2.0 User Reviews | Hornet 2.0 Community

Mileage of Hornet 2.0 Competitors

TVS Apache RTR 160 4V
Rs. 1.24 Lakh
Apache RTR 160 4V Mileage Hornet 2.0 vs Apache RTR 160 4V
TVS Apache RTR 160
Rs. 1.20 Lakh
Apache RTR 160 Mileage Hornet 2.0 vs Apache RTR 160
TVS Apache RTR 180
Rs. 1.33 Lakh
Apache RTR 180 Mileage Hornet 2.0 vs Apache RTR 180
Bajaj Pulsar NS200
Rs. 1.58 Lakh
Pulsar NS200 Mileage Hornet 2.0 vs Pulsar NS200
TVS Apache RTR 200 4V
Rs. 1.46 Lakh
Apache RTR 200 4V Mileage Hornet 2.0 vs Apache RTR 200 4V

Honda Hornet 2.0 Videos

Watch Honda Hornet 2.0 videos to know more about this. Subscribe to the ZigWheels YouTube channel for detailed reviews, comparisons, exterior and interior walkarounds, pros & cons, specs & features, and lots more.