Odysse Electric Evoqis vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Last Updated: October 9, 2026

Odysse Electric Evoqis price starts at Rs. 1.18 Lakh, which is Rs. 19,640 cheaper than the base variant of Royal Enfield Hunter 350, priced at Rs. 1.38 Lakh. In terms of efficiency, the Hunter 350 returns a claimed 36.2 kmpl, while the Evoqis offers a claimed 90 km/charge. On the performance front, the Evoqis uses a 2.4Kwh battery producing 4.3 kW and the Hunter 350 a 349cc engine producing 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm. If you're deciding between the Evoqis and Hunter 350, the Evoqis is the better pick for affordability.

Evoqis vs Hunter 350 Comparison Summary

Specification	Odysse Electric Evoqis	Royal Enfield Hunter 350
Ex-showroom price (base)	Rs. 1.18 Lakh	Rs. 1.38 Lakh
Mileage / Range	90 km/charge	36.2 kmpl
Engine / Battery	2.4 Kwh	349 cc
Max power / Motor	4.3 kW	20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Kerb weight	Not Available	177 Kg

Add Bike to Compare
Hide Common Features
Odysse Electric Evoqis
Lite

Rs. 1.18 Lakh View October Offers
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
Base

Rs. 1.38 Lakh EMI - Rs. 3,965 Get Navratri Offers

Evoqis vs Hunter 350 Key Highlights

Basic Info	Odysse Electric Evoqis Lite	Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Base
Rating	48 reviews	863 reviews
Brand Name	Odysse Electric	Royal Enfield
Ex-Showroom Price	Rs. 1.18 Lakh Check On Road Price	Rs. 1.38 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type	Not Available	Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled
Max Power	4.3 kW	20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Fuel Type	Electric	Petrol
Colors	Odysse Electric Evoqis Colors	Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
Braking Type	Not Available	Anti-lock Braking System
Wheel Size	Front :-431.8 mm, Rear :-431.8 mm	Front :-17 Inch,Rear :-17 Inch
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)	Alloy	Spoke
Range	90 km/charge	Not Available
Charging Time	6 Hr	Not Available
ABS	Not Available	Single Channel
Starting	Push Button Start	Self Start Only
Speedometer	Digital	Analogue
Running Cost	Rs. 0.17/km	Rs. 2.76/km
EMI	Not Available	Rs. 3,965 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance	Rs. 4,344 Evoqis Insurance	Rs. 11,005 Hunter 350 Insurance
Brochure	Download Brochure	Download Brochure

Engine/Motor

Spark Plugs	Not Available	1 Per Cylinder
Valves (per cylinder)	Not Available	2
Claimed Top Speed	75 km/Hr	114 kmph
Emission Norm Compliance	Not Available	bs6.2
Motor Torque	64 Nm	Not Available
Flex Fuel Blend	Not Available	E20
Engine Type	Not Available	Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled
Engine Displacement	Not Available	349 cc
Gear Box	Not Available	5 Speed
No. Of Batteries	1	Not Available
Max Power	4.3 kW	20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Max Torque	Not Available	27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Bore	Not Available	72 mm
Stroke	Not Available	85.8 mm
Number Of Cylinders	Not Available	1
Drive Type	Hub Motor	Chain Drive
Fuel System	Not Available	Electronic Injection
Fuel Type	Electric	Petrol
Ignition	Not Available	Electronic Fuel Injection
Compression Ratio	Not Available	9.5 : 1

Brakes

Front Brake	Disc	Disc
Rear Brake	Disc	Drum
Front Caliper	Not Available	2 Piston
Rear Caliper	Not Available	1 Piston
Braking Type	Not Available	Anti-lock Braking System

Performance

Mileage (Overall)	Not Available	36.2 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)	Not Available	16.40s
Braking 60-0 km/h	Not Available	18.13m
Braking 80-0 km/h	Not Available	32.08m
Braking 100-0 km/h	Not Available	52.68m
Estimated Mileage	Not Available	35-40 kmpl
Roll-ons 30-70 kmph (3rd Gear)	Not Available	6.47s
Roll-ons 40-80 kmph (4th Gear)	Not Available	8.87s
Fuel Gauge	Not Available	Digital

Suspension

Rear Suspension Preload Adjustment	Not Available	Yes
Rear Suspension Travel / Wheel Travel	Not Available	100 mm
Suspension-Front	Telescopic	Telescopic, 41mm forks
Suspension-Rear	Spring Suspension	Twin shock absorbers with 6-step adjustable preload

Tyres

Front Tyre Pressure (Rider)	Not Available	29 psi
Front Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)	Not Available	29 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider)	Not Available	32 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)	Not Available	33 psi
Brake Fluid Grade	Not Available	DOT4
Tyre Size	Front :-110/70-17, Rear :-140/70-17	Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Wheel Size	Front :-431.8 mm, Rear :-431.8 mm	Front :-17 Inch,Rear :-17 Inch
Tyre Make	Not Available	CEAT
Tyre Type	Tubeless	Tube
Radial Tyre	Not Available	Yes
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)	Alloy	Spoke

Dimensions

Seat height	750 mm	790 mm
Load carrying capacity	170 kg	179 kg
Fuel Tank Reserve Capacity	Not Available	2.6 L
Gross Weight	150 kg	360 kg
Engine Oil Capacity	Not Available	2.2 L
Engine Oil Grade	Not Available	SAE 15W 50 API SL grade JASO MA2 semi synthetic
LengthWidthHeight	20607401150 mm³	20558101070 mm³
Wheelbase	1410 mm	1370 mm
Length	2060 mm	2055 mm
Ground Clearance	170 mm	160 mm
Height	1150 mm	1070 mm
Width	740 mm	810 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity	Not Available	13 L
Kerb Weight	Not Available	177 Kg
Tail Light	LED	Bulb
Front Brake Size	Not Available	300 mm
Rear Brake Size	Not Available	153 mm

Electricals

Battery Type	Li-ion	Lead Acid
Motor Power	30 kW	Not Available
Claimed range	90 km/charge	Not Available
Roadside assistance	Not Available	Optional
Anti-theft alert	Yes	Not Available
USB charging port	Not Available	Type C
Conventional Charging Time	6 Hours	Not Available
Range	90 km/charge	Not Available
Headlight	LED	Halogen
Charging at Home	Yes	Not Available
Battery Capacity	2.4 Kwh	12V / 8AH
Charging Time	6 Hr	Not Available

Features

Frame Type	Not Available	Twin Downtube Spine Frame
Digital Display Type	Not Available	LCD
Malfunction Indicator	Not Available	Yes
Trip Meter	Digital	Digital
Pillion Seat	Not Available	Yes
Pillion Grab Rail	Not Available	Yes
Riding Modes	Yes	Yes
Kill Switch	Not Available	Yes
Low battery alert	Yes	Yes
No. of Tripmeters	Not Available	3
Rear Footpegs	Yes	Yes
Multi-function Lock	Not Available	Yes
Additional Features/Information	Motor Cut-Off Switch, Drive Modes - City \| Parking \| Sports \| Reverse	Wet sump, forced lubrication, Paper element Air Cleaner
Gear Position Indicator	Not Available	Yes
ABS Type	Not Available	Single Channel
Side Stand Warning	Not Available	Yes
Physical Key	Not Available	Yes
Exhaust Heat Shield	Not Available	Yes
Front Footpegs	Not Available	Forward-set
Body	Not Available	Metal
Reverse Assist	Yes	Not Available
Instrument Cluster Control Switchcube	Not Available	Yes
ABS	Not Available	Single Channel
Body Type	Electric Bikes, Sports Bikes	Roadster Bikes
Body Graphics	Yes	Not Available
Instrument Console Type	Digital	Analogue and Digital
Starting	Push Button Start	Self Start Only
Seat Type	Split	Single
Pass Beam Switch	Not Available	Yes
Speedometer	Digital	Analogue
Low Fuel Warning Lamp	Not Available	Yes
Clock	Yes	Yes
Low Battery Indicator	Yes	Yes
Low Oil Indicator	Not Available	Yes
Cooling System	Not Available	Air & Oil Cooled
Odometer	Digital	Digital
Service Due Indicator	Not Available	Yes
Keyless Ignition	Yes	Not Available
Saree Guard	Not Available	Yes
Shift Light	Not Available	Yes
Hazard Light Switch	Not Available	Yes

Service Cost

1st Service	Not Available	500kms/45 days
2nd Service	Not Available	5000kms/180 days
3rd Service	Not Available	10000kms/360 days
4th Service	Not Available	15000kms/540 days

Warranty

Vehicle Warranty	Not Available	3 Years or 30,000 Km
Standard Warranty (Years)	Not Available	3
Standard Warranty (kilometers)	Not Available	30000

Pros and Cons

Positives
Negatives

Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Most affordable Royal Enfield
Lightest Royal Enfield
Fun, sharp handling
Torquey J-series engine
Good real-world mileage
Neo-retro design
Wide colour choice
Dual-channel ABS
Low seat height
3-year warranty

Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Firm rear suspension
Weak top-end performance
Basic features
Base variant is bare
Slightly sporty posture
Lower ground clearance
Spongy brake levers

Is Odysse Electric Evoqis Better Than Royal Enfield Hunter 350?

66% users have chosen Odysse Electric Evoqis over Royal Enfield Hunter 350 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 1408 users have also rated Odysse Electric Evoqis and Royal Enfield Hunter 350 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Odysse Electric Evoqis is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage and maintenance in your bike. But Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is better on the grounds of performance, comfort and features.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor	Evoqis	Hunter 350
Mileage	4.2	3.9
Performance	4.0	4.4
Comfort	4.0	4.5
Maintenance	4.1	3.8
Features	4.3	4.4

Videos of Odysse Electric Evoqis and Royal Enfield Hunter 350

5 Bike Launches In June 2022: Bajaj Pulsar N160, Royal Enfield Hunter 350, TVS Zeppelin, And More 1 Jun, 2022 10483 views 6:08
5 Bike Launches In July 2022: TVS Zeppelin, Ducati Streetfighter V4 SP, Suzuki Katana, RE Hunter 350 and more 2 Jul, 2022 59823 views 5:10
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Ronin Comparison Review | Distinct Yet Contrasting | Zigwheels.com 8 Sep, 2022 7860 views 15:22
Kawasaki W175 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Retro Bikes Compared | Does The Kwacker Make Sense? 29 Jan, 2023 10151 views 6:05

Latest News on Odysse Electric Evoqis and Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Explained Through 10 Detailed
14 Mar, 2026 | By Team ZigWheels
BREAKING: 2025 Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Launched - A Comfier City Slicker
26 Apr, 2025 | By Team ZigWheels

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?

HUNTER 350

Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?

Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.

Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?

The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.

|Odysse Electric Evoqis Community