Keeway K300 SF vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350
Last Updated: October 12, 2026
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 price starts at Rs. 1.38 Lakh, which is Rs. 19,360 cheaper than the base variant of Keeway K300 SF, priced at Rs. 1.57 Lakh. In terms of mileage, the K300 SF offers a claimed 40 kmpl, while the Hunter 350 delivers 36.2 kmpl. On the performance front, the K300 SF uses a 292.4cc engine producing 27.88 PS @ 8750 rpm and the Hunter 350 a 349cc engine producing 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm. If you're deciding between the K300 SF and Hunter 350, the K300 SF is the better pick for mileage and performance, while the Hunter 350 stands out for affordability.
...Read More
K300 SF vs Hunter 350 Comparison Summary
| Specification | Keeway K300 SF | Royal Enfield Hunter 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Ex-showroom price (base) | Rs. 1.57 Lakh | Rs. 1.38 Lakh |
| Mileage | 40 kmpl | 36.2 kmpl |
| Engine | 292.4 cc | 349 cc |
| Max power | 27.88 PS @ 8750 rpm | 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm |
| Kerb weight | 151 Kg | 177 Kg |
-
Keeway K300 SF
Rs. 1.57 Lakh EMI - Rs. 4,523 View October OffersRoyal Enfield Hunter 350
Rs. 1.38 Lakh EMI - Rs. 3,965 Get Navratri Offers
K300 SF vs Hunter 350 Key Highlights
| Basic Info | Keeway K300 SF STD | Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Base |
|---|---|---|
| Rating |
|
866 reviews
|
| Brand Name | Keeway | Royal Enfield |
| Ex-Showroom Price | Rs. 1.57 Lakh Check On Road Price | Rs. 1.38 Lakh Check On Road Price |
| Engine Type | Single-Cylinder, Liquid-Cooled, DOHC | Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled |
| Max Power | 27.88 PS @ 8750 rpm | 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Colors | ||
| Braking Type | Not Available | Anti-lock Braking System |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-17 Inch,Rear :-17 Inch |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Spoke |
| ABS | Dual Channel | Single Channel |
| Starting | Kick and Self Start | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Analogue |
| EMI |
Rs. 4,523
@
9.45% (36 months)
|
Rs. 3,965
@
9.45% (36 months)
|
| Insurance | Rs. 11,330 K300 SF Insurance | Rs. 11,005 Hunter 350 Insurance |
| Brochure | N/A |
Download
Brochure
|
Engine |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brakes |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Suspension |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tyres |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dimensions |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electricals |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Features |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service Cost |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warranty |
|
Pros and Cons
- Positives
- Negatives
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
- Most affordable Royal Enfield
- Lightest Royal Enfield
- Fun, sharp handling
- Torquey J-series engine
- Good real-world mileage
- Neo-retro design
- Wide colour choice
- Dual-channel ABS
- Low seat height
- 3-year warranty
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
- Firm rear suspension
- Weak top-end performance
- Basic features
- Base variant is bare
- Slightly sporty posture
- Lower ground clearance
- Spongy brake levers
Videos of Keeway K300 SF and Royal Enfield Hunter 350
- 5 Bike Launches In June 2022: Bajaj Pulsar N160, Royal Enfield Hunter 350, TVS Zeppelin, And More 1 Jun, 2022 10489 views 6:08
- 5 Bike Launches In July 2022: TVS Zeppelin, Ducati Streetfighter V4 SP, Suzuki Katana, RE Hunter 350 and more 2 Jul, 2022 59831 views 5:10
- Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Ronin Comparison Review | Distinct Yet Contrasting | Zigwheels.com 8 Sep, 2022 7873 views 15:22
- Kawasaki W175 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Retro Bikes Compared | Does The Kwacker Make Sense? 29 Jan, 2023 10163 views 6:05
Latest News on Keeway K300 SF and Royal Enfield Hunter 350
-
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Explained Through 10 Detailed14 Mar, 2026 | By Team ZigWheels -
BREAKING: 2025 Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Launched - A Comfier City Slicker26 Apr, 2025 | By Team ZigWheels
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
- HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
- Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
- The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.
Keeway K300 SF Vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 FAQs
Which bike is best between Keeway K300 SF vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
Keeway K300 SF has out rated Royal Enfield Hunter 350 on all the rating factors.
Which bike is cheaper Keeway K300 SF vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is cheaper than Keeway K300 SF by ₹19,360.
Which bike offers better performance Keeway K300 SF vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
For the STD version, 292.4 cc Petrol engine of K300 SF produces 27.88 PS @ 8750 rpm of power and 25 Nm @ 7000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Base version, 349 cc Petrol engine of Hunter 350 produces 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torqueAs per the users experiences the Keeway K300 SF has better performance.
Images of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Keeway K300 SF
Which one do you like more?
- Home ›
- New Bikes ›
- Compare Bikes ›
- Keeway K300 SF vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350
×

