KTM RC 200 Small User Reviews

It's been 2 years since i brought this bike.Let me get to it straight because i am not going to talk about specs.Good: 1.Bike quality is high enough for the price.(i had met with few accidents but still i am going to appreciate about the build quality, Only minor scratches.) 2.Rider comfort improved from previous gen model.3.The new aerodynamic design improved more stability during corning because of closed front design.Trust me i had driven old rc too, The sharp front improves the initial but can't hold stable while corners especially against counter winds.(you can test drive) 4.About service -good, People are friendly and cost is avg.Bad: 1.The mileage, Of course we shouldn't complain about it because of high compression ratio engine.My avg.Speed 60 - 80 on highways i get around 38 - 40 kmpl sometimes.But in city traffic only 30 - 35.But not always the same.It depends upon each one's driving style.2.I got problems with ecu and fuel- pump within 8 months, After one year i got problem with battery and rear abs got failure.At that time my total km was just 4200 approx.Yeah i don't drive long so small kms.This is my review from my side.The best thing of this bike is "the power it produce".If you ask me whether to buy or not then i would say it depends on your wish.In this segment, There are also good bikes like this one for example: 1.Yamaha r15 v4.2.Mt-15.3.Pulsar rs 200.4.Pulsar ns 200.5.Duke 200.(has same specs but minor changes)remember, Each bike has it's own pro's and con's.None of them is superior then others."choose from your heart, Not from others opinions"don't forget to wear proper riding gearsride safe!.

It's been 2 years since i brought this bike.Let me get to it straight because i am not going to talk about specs.Good: 1.Bike quality is high enough for the price.(i had met with few accidents but still i am going to appreciate about the build quality, Only minor scratches.) 2.Rider comfort improved from previous gen model.3.The new aerodynamic design improved more stability during corning because of closed front design.Trust me i had driven old rc too, The sharp front improves the initial but can't hold stable while corners especially against counter winds.(you can test drive) 4.About service -good, People are friendly and cost is avg.Bad: 1.The mileage, Of course we shouldn't complain about it because of high compression ratio engine.My avg.Speed 60 - 80 on highways i get around 38 - 40 kmpl sometimes.But in city traffic only 30 - 35.But not always the same.It depends upon each one's driving style.2.I got problems with ecu and fuel- pump within 8 months, After one year i got problem with battery and rear abs got failure.At that time my total km was just 4200 approx.Yeah i don't drive long so small kms.This is my review from my side.The best thing of this bike is "the power it produce".If you ask me whether to buy or not then i would say it depends on your wish.In this segment, There are also good bikes like this one for example: 1.Yamaha r15 v4.2.Mt-15.3.Pulsar rs 200.4.Pulsar ns 200.5.Duke 200.(has same specs but minor changes)remember, Each bike has it's own pro's and con's.None of them is superior then others."choose from your heart, Not from others opinions"don't forget to wear proper riding gearsride safe!.