Yamaha FZ 25 vs Yamaha R15 V3 BS6 Comparison

Yamaha FZ 25 vs Yamaha R15 V3 BS6

Yamaha YZF-R15 V3 BS6 Price starts at Rs. 1.46 lakh which is Rs. 11,220 costlier than Yamaha FZ 25 priced at Rs. 1.35 lakh. The claimed mileage for the Yamaha FZ 25 is 45.6 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for Yamaha YZF-R15 V3 BS6 is NA. In technical specifications, Yamaha FZ 25 is powered by 249 cc engine where as Yamaha YZF-R15 V3 BS6 is powered by 155 cc engine. Yamaha FZ 25 is available in 1 different colours while Yamaha YZF-R15 V3 BS6 comes with 1 colours. 100% users have chosen Yamaha YZF R15 V3 BS6 over Yamaha FZ 25 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Yamaha FZ 25 vs Yamaha YZF-R15 V3 BS6 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.

Engine Type Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, SOHC Engine Liquid cooled, 4-Stroke, 4-Valve, SOHC Engine
Engine Displacement (CC) 249 cc 155 cc
Power (PS@rpm) 20.9 PS @ 8000 rpm 18.6 PS @ 10000 rpm
Torque (Nm@rpm)
Bore 74 mm 58 mm
Stroke 58 mm 58.7 mm
No Of Cylinders 1 1
Drive Type Chain Drive Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder 2 4
Fuel System
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Ignition TCI (Transistor controlled ignition)
Compression Ratio 9.8:1 11.6:1
Engine Immobilizer
Transmission Type Manual Manual
No Of Gears 5-speed 6-Speed
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Braking Type
0-60 kmph (sec) 3.77s
Quarter Mile 17.32s@117.22 kmph
Braking (60-0 kmph) 2.89s, 15.85mm
20-80 kmph (kickdown)
30-70 kmph (3rd gear)
40-80 kmph (4th gear)
Braking (80-0 kmph) 3.61s, 30.02mm
Braking (100-0 kmph)
Mileage (City) 45.6 kmpl
Mileage (Highway) 31.17 kmpl
Mileage (Overall) 35 kmpl
Mileage (ARAI) kmpl
0-100 kmph (sec) 10.33s
Top Speed (Km/h)
0-160 kmph
Braking 60-0 km/h 2.89s, 15.85mm
Chassis Type
Suspension-Front Telescopic Fork Telescopic Fork
Chassis Daimond Delta Box
Suspension-Rear Swingarm (Monocross) Monocross (link suspension)
Tyre Size Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-140/70-17 Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/70-17
Wheel Size Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch Front :-17 inch Rear :-17 Inch
Tyre Make
Tyre Type Tubeless Tubeless
Radial Tyre Yes
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) 25 psi
Optimum Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
Dry Weight
Length*Width*Height 2015*770*1075 1990*725*1135
Wheelbase(mm) 1360 mm 1325 mm
Length 2015 mm 1990 mm
Ground Clearance (mm) 160 mm 170 mm
Height 1075 mm 1135 mm
Seat Height 795 mm 815 mm
Width 770 mm 725 mm
Fuel Capacity (Litres) 14 L 11 L
Kerb Weight
Total Weight
Tail Light LED LED
Front Brake Diameter 282 mm 282 mm
Rear Brake Diameter 220 mm 220 mm
Battery Type ETZ
Charging Time
Motor Type
Motor Power
Fast Charging
Head Lamp
Projector head light
Pilot Lamps
LED tail lights
Seat Opening Switch
Boot Light
Turn Signal Lamp Bulb Bulb
Power Modes
Cruise Control
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel
Body Type Sports Naked Bikes Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Seat Type Split Split
Pass Switch Yes Yes
Speedometer Digital Digital
Handle Type
Trip Meter Digital Digital
Charging point
Average Fuel economy
Digital Fuel Indicator
Distance to Empty
Low Fuel Warning Lamp Yes
External Fuel Filling
Clock Digital
Stand Alarm
Low Battery Indicator
Stepup Seat
Low Oil Indicator Yes Yes
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights
Passenger Backrest
Carry hook
Underseat storage
Cooling System Air Cooled Liquid Cooled
Console Digital Digital
Anti Theft Alarm
Shutter Lock
Odometer Digital Digital
Central Locking
Mobile Connectivity No
Service Due Indicator
Switchable ABS
Keyless Ignition
Standard Warranty (Years)
Standard Warranty (kilometers)

Similar Bike Comparisons

Compare Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Is this bike worth to buy? Please help me to know any pros. and cons. about this bike or any other bike in this segment. - FZ 25?
  • Bro. I've owned this bike for around 2 years now. The bike is great and everything. Its good a good and peppy engine. Great milage considering the power it has. Extremely comfortable seats. The main downside i came across was the weak headlight unit. You could very well get an aftermarket LED fitted on it or go for fog lamps. 6th gear is a problem only when the bike is pushed hard. In normal city driving and highway runs you won't need a 6th gear. The service and maintenance cost of the bike is very less as with all Yamaha bikes. Also it is ultra reliable and won't need too many services
  • Hello. The 2019 model gets dual channel Abs.
  • Pros- Good pickup, Nice accelerating, Good for both city and highway driving. mileage in best with 250 cc segment and it's almost low budget bike in 250 cc also. service center available everywhere cons- Air cooled Bike, little problem in engine hitting specially on long drive and on summer season. Old and 1st model don't have ABS that's a badluck. silencer got rusted with more heat power from engine and even after repeated paint by the showroom still its again looks like iron parts. but still overall it's amazing bike
View All Answers
Q. Pulsar NS 200 or Yamaha FZ 25, which one is better?
  • Both have their pros and cons. I faced the same confusion. I booked ns 200 then canceled it and bought Fz25. The main reason was the look. When you sit on it, it feels very premium. And also because it is made by yamaha. No one can beat yamaha in terms of engine refinement and durability of a bike. Speaking of NS 200, it has a liquid cooled engine and abs option as well. Which FZ25 Misses out. So i suggest have a test drive and then decide.I personally choose FZ25 and have really enjoyed the experience & the power of this bike.
  • FZ25 Buddy... Anytimeit is more practical, better torque, better fuel efficiency, better handling, better built quality, more reliable, less vibration, more refined enginewhat else do you needtop speed - 135fuel economy - 38-44
  • If you need better build quality the. go for fz25. if you need normal build quality the. go for ns200 but ns200 is best bike owner of a fz25 saying ns200 is best close your eyes and go for it
View All Answers
Q. Which bike is better, Apache RTR 200 4V or FZ 25?
  • The TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is a comfortable city bike with plenty of grunt and agility for a quick race off the traffic lights and to tackle some twisties as well. But the engine feels too strained out on the highway. Also, ergonomically, with the high-set footpegs, it’s a tight spot for someone taller than 5 feet 10 inches. Even the brakes fail to inspire confidence under hard braking. Luckily though, TVS does offer ABS as an option. While, the Yamaha FZ25 is a good option for someone looking for a daily commuter. It’s a lot more welcoming for tall riders as well, when compared to the TVS Apache RTR 200 4V. Being a Yamaha, the FZ25 will prove to be reliable in the long run, looks smart and is a lot more frugal in the city. But the engine feels stressed at high speeds. Moreover, both the brakes and tyres don’t inspire confidence under hard braking either. If your daily riding consists more of city commutes, the Yamaha FZ25 or the TVS Apache RTR 200 4V both are good to go. But if you are looking to ride your bike out on the highway as well, the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is a more potent tool to opt for.We would suggest you to take a test ride in order to clear your all doubts. Click on the given link to get your nearest dealership details: https://www.zigwheels.com/bikes/dealers
  • Well both the bikes have come from a promising brand, so differentiating them on the build quality won't be wise. The only thing i can say is that the fz25 is much more comfortable than the apache in the city as well as on the highway. And as we go onto the specs the fz offers a better torque and a lot better pickup and braking as compared to the apache. So i would recommend the fz25 over the apache 200 4v
  • Both bikes performance is quiet equal on paper. TVS Apache 4v is quiet cheaper in terms of money and thats because the built quality is quiet cheap. While FZ 25 built quality quiet better.
View All Answers
View More Questions