TVS Apache 200 4V Race vs Yamaha MT 15 Comparison

TVS Apache 200 4V Race vs Yamaha MT 15

Yamaha MT 15 Price starts at Rs. 1.36 lakh which is Rs. 24,155 costlier than TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 priced at Rs. 1.12 lakh. The claimed mileage for the TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 is NA where as the claimed mileage for Yamaha MT 15 is 48.6 kmpl. In technical specifications, TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 is powered by 197.75 cc engine where as Yamaha MT 15 is powered by 155 cc engine. TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 is available in 8 different colours while Yamaha MT 15 comes with 1 colours. 51% users have chosen Yamaha MT-15 over TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 vs Yamaha MT 15 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.

Engine Type SI, 4-stroke, Oil-cooled Engine Liquid cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve
Engine Displacement (CC) 197.75 cc 155 cc
Power (PS@rpm) 20.5 PS @ 8500 rpm 19.3 PS @ 10000 rpm
Torque (Nm@rpm)
Bore 66 mm 58 mm
Stroke 57.8 mm 58.7 mm
No Of Cylinders 1 1
Drive Type Chain Drive Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder 4 4
Fuel System
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Ignition IDI - Multi curve digital Ignition Transistor controlled ignition
Compression Ratio 9.7:1 11.6:1
Engine Immobilizer
Transmission Type Manual Manual
No Of Gears 5 Speed 6-Speed
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Braking Type
0-60 kmph (sec) 3.95s 4.21s
Quarter Mile 17.99 s @ 113.74 kmpl
Braking (60-0 kmph) 21.40 m, 3.06 secm
20-80 kmph (kickdown)
30-70 kmph (3rd gear)
40-80 kmph (4th gear)
Braking (80-0 kmph) 38.25 m, 3.92 secm
Braking (100-0 kmph) 63.43 m, 4.92 secm
Mileage (City) 48.58 kmpl
Mileage (Highway) 52.02 kmph
Mileage (Overall) 45 kmpl
Mileage (ARAI) kmpl
0-100 kmph (sec) 12.08s
Top Speed (Km/h)
0-160 kmph
Braking 60-0 km/h 21.40 m, 3.06 secm
Chassis Type
Suspension-Front Telescopic with Hydraulic dampers Telescopic Fork
Chassis Double Cradle Split Synchro STIFF Delta Box
Suspension-Rear Mono shock suspension Swingarm
Tyre Size Front :-90/90-17 Rear :-130/70-17 Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/70-17
Wheel Size Front :-17 inch Rear :-17 inch Front :-17 inch Rear :-17 Inch
Tyre Make
Tyre Type Tubeless Tubeless
Radial Tyre Yes
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
Optimum Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
Dry Weight
Length*Width*Height 2018*790*1105 2020*800*1070
Wheelbase(mm) 1353 mm 1335 mm
Length 2018 mm 2020 mm
Ground Clearance (mm) 180 mm 155 mm
Height 1105 mm 1070 mm
Seat Height 800 mm 810 mm
Width 790 mm 800 mm
Fuel Capacity (Litres) 12 L 10 L
Kerb Weight
Total Weight
Tail Light LED LED
Front Brake Diameter 270 mm 282 mm
Rear Brake Diameter 240 mm 220 mm
Battery Type ETZ-5
Charging Time
Motor Type
Motor Power
Fast Charging
Head Lamp
Projector head light
Pilot Lamps
LED tail lights
Seat Opening Switch
Boot Light
Turn Signal Lamp LED Bulb
Power Modes
Cruise Control
ABS Dual Channel Single Channel
Body Type Sports Naked Bikes, Sports Bikes Sports Naked Bikes
Body Graphics
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Seat Type Split Single
Pass Switch Yes Yes
Speedometer Digital Digital
Handle Type
Trip Meter Digital Digital
Charging point
Average Fuel economy
Digital Fuel Indicator
Distance to Empty
Low Fuel Warning Lamp Yes Yes
External Fuel Filling
Stand Alarm
Low Battery Indicator
Stepup Seat
Low Oil Indicator Yes
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights
Passenger Backrest
Carry hook
Underseat storage
Cooling System Oil Cooled Liquid Cooled
Console Digital Digital
Anti Theft Alarm
Shutter Lock
Odometer Digital Digital
Central Locking
Navigation Yes
Mobile Connectivity No
Service Due Indicator
Switchable ABS
Keyless Ignition
Standard Warranty (Years)
Standard Warranty (kilometers)

Similar Bike Comparisons

Compare Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Whats is the seat height difference Duke 200 and MT-15?
  • Not much, the MT is just 5 mm more at 815mm over duke 200 with 810mm. I'm exactly 5'7' and my both legs plant completely while wearing a running shoe and slightly one in air while rocking any sneaker.
  • The seat is smaller on the MT-15 &same on Duke 200
Q. I am a guy weighing only 53kgs and 5'4 ft tall will MT-15 suit me. Comparatively the Pulsar NS160, Apache 160 4v and Duke 125 are heavier options?
  • I have the same physique as yours, I own an mt15.I have faced any issues till now..Ofcourse I don't have flat foot on both sides but the bike is so nimble and compact and thus you can easily move it in the parking...Also due to it's well designed centre of gravity you will have to use your foot in traffic very rarely....In my opinion take a test ride and if you feel comfortable go for it.👍
  • 5'4' height might trouble you in traffic as i won't recommend anyone below 5'6' to go for this bike unless you are rich with experience and handling capability and so as the case with the other options you mentioned.... visit the showroom as weight has nothing to do with the bike decision.... look for the new avenger
  • Weight is not much of a problem but the height could be a problem.usualy this bike is well suited for 5'6 to 5'9 people... whatever, if you have previous riding experience then there might be a chance for you to be able to handle the bike well.so take test ride and then decide
View All Answers
Q. I would like to know which is better option if not Apache RTR 200 4V XONNECT edition, I am confused with latest Apache RTR 200 4V with MT-15 and FZ25. Please suggest which is better option?
  • Rtr is a track oriented bike...others naked for streets..fz25 and mt does all chores in a city with linear acceleration...with good mileage. if you need start brake corner..repeat .. (not in roads please)performance rtr is the choice.
  • For all round purpose, rtr200 is best option and value for money bike
  • RTR 200 is the best option for the regular users
View All Answers
View More Questions View More Questions